Nic_Driver
Active Member
- Mar 25, 2011
- 868
- 76
- 28
JRK has a fail in this OP, period.
Yes he has.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
JRK has a fail in this OP, period.
JRK has a fail in this OP, period.
Yes he has.
"Prior to 2002, the Security Council had passed 16 resolutions on Iraq.Produce the text of any UNSC Resolution authorizing the use of force against Iraq.The lefties are just recycling through the talking points now. No matter how often they are proven wrong, they think that if they just read through their list often enough they will convince someone.
It is a fact that the U.N. did not authorize any action; it was quite a little issue for the Bush administration while they were trying to drum up support for the war.
Pray for Perry.When did Iraq launch an armed attack against the US?I am starting to see the "arrest GWB" for war crimes crowd showing up
If you believe that there is some law in this world that prevents this country to take action to either defend them selves and or to remove a regime that this country feels is in its best interest to do so, then your badly mistaken
when this event took place in congress
Senate approves Iraq war resolution - CNN
It began the path to make it legal
when this event took place in congress in 2006, it finished the path to be a legal war
Defense.gov News Article: Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says
It is so simple I cannot believe that people would for one second think this war was anything but in our best interest
When did it threaten such an attack?
What UN Security Council Resolution specifically authorized the use of force against Iraq?
Bush and Cheney are war whores who didn't even have the integrity to risk their own lives in Vietnam.
They should be dropped through trap doors at the end of short ropes.
1993 was the first attack against the US by Iraq
These questions have an obvious bearing not only on past events but on possible future ones as well. [2] It is important to know who Ramzi Yousef is and who his "friends" are, because if he is not just a bomber-for-hire, or an Islamic militant loosely connected to other Muslim fundamentalists, Yousef's "friends" could still prove very dangerous to the United States. It is of considerable interest, therefore, that a very persuasive case can be made that Ramzi Yousef is an Iraqi intelligence agent, and that his bombing conspiracies were meant as Saddam Hussein's revenge for the Gulf War. If so, and if, as U.S. officials strongly suspect, Baghdad still secretly possesses biological warfare agents, then we may still not have heard the last from Saddam Hussein.
Few Americans are aware of the true scale of the destructive ambition behind that bomb, this despite the fact that two years later, the key figure responsible for building it--a man who had entered the United Stares on an Iraqi passport under the name of Ramzi Yousef--was involved in another stupendous bombing conspiracy. In January 1995, Yousef and his associates plotted to blow up eleven U.S. commercial aircraft in one spectacular day of terrorist rage. The bombs were to be made of a liquid explosive designed to pass through airport metal detectors. But while mixing his chemical brew in a Manila apartment, Yousef started a fire. He was forced to flee, leaving behind a computer that contained the information that led to his arrest a month later in Pakistan. Among the items found in his possession was a letter threatening Filipino interests if a comrade held in custody were not released. It claimed the "ability to make and use chemicals and poisonous gas... for use against vital institutions and residential populations and the sources of drinking water." [1] Quickly extradited, he is now in U.S. custody awaiting trial this spring.
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMB: Who is Ramzi Yousef? And Why It Matters - The National Interest, Winter, 1995/96
And as far as your feelings for GWB and D.C goes
your a very sick human being, I will pray for you
You didn't read my post, did you?
Yes, I did. There are even more eloquent neo cons than you making all kinds of excuses about the disaster of going into Iraq! Be proud of the war YOU REPUBS started!![]()
I dont know how old you are
the vote in congress had 29 Dems voted for it out of 50
besides
Saddam does the right thing from 1991 thru 2003
there is not war
The liberal will never understand the concept of root cause
Yes, I did. There are even more eloquent neo cons than you making all kinds of excuses about the disaster of going into Iraq! Be proud of the war YOU REPUBS started!![]()
I dont know how old you are
the vote in congress had 29 Dems voted for it out of 50
besides
Saddam does the right thing from 1991 thru 2003
there is not war
The liberal will never understand the concept of root cause
funny, I dont know old you are either. But then again, I dont care too much anyway.
root cause? ha ha. take credit for the war you guys started. you can name dems all day that voted for it. You seem to think I am a democrat or something. But I do know who dragged this country in iraq. And I HAVE been against it from the beginning! and you know what that makes me? RIGHT!
Being a DAD, I always taught my kids to be honest and stop with the excuse making. The way you neo cons characterize the WAR YOU STARTED shows me a desperate group of people running away from something they started and blaming everyone else! excuses abound! Deflections! Unfortunately for you, I DO REMEMBER Bush staring America in the eye at his State of the Union Adress and LYING to me and the rest of America! OWN UP TO IT, MAN!![]()
"Prior to 2002, the Security Council had passed 16 resolutions on Iraq.Produce the text of any UNSC Resolution authorizing the use of force against Iraq.
It is a fact that the U.N. did not authorize any action; it was quite a little issue for the Bush administration while they were trying to drum up support for the war.
"In 2002, the Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1441.
"In 2003, the governments of the US, Britain, and Spain proposed another resolution on Iraq, which they called the 'eighteenth resolution' and others called the 'second resolution.'
"This proposed resolution was subsequently withdrawn when it became clear that several permanent members of the Council would cast no votes on any new resolution, thereby vetoing it.
"Had that occurred, it would have become even more difficult for those wishing to invade Iraq to argue that the Council had authorized the subsequent invasion.
"Regardless of the threatened or likely vetoes, it seems that the coalition at no time was assured any more than four affirmative votes in the Councilthe US, Britain, Spain, and Bulgariawell short of the requirement for nine affirmative votes."
United Nations Security Council and the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Since Iraq has never directly attacked the US there was neither a legitimate excuse for invasion based upon individual or collective self-defense nor any Security Council resolution specifically authorizing an attack on Iraq.
War is a racket and Cheney, Bush, Rummy and Condi, et al, have all resumed reaping profits from wars they lied into existence. They should all draw their last breath in supermax.
No you didn't dumb ass.kaz said:You didn't read my post, did you?
Yes, I did. There are even more eloquent neo cons than you making all kinds of excuses about the disaster of going into Iraq! Be proud of the war YOU REPUBS started!![]()
No you didn't dumb ass.kaz said:You didn't read my post, did you?
Yes, I did. There are even more eloquent neo cons than you making all kinds of excuses about the disaster of going into Iraq! Be proud of the war YOU REPUBS started!![]()
Neocon? I'm not a Republican, I'm against the wars and I'm against government spending. On the other hand you are a clueless moron.
I dont know how old you are
the vote in congress had 29 Dems voted for it out of 50
besides
Saddam does the right thing from 1991 thru 2003
there is not war
The liberal will never understand the concept of root cause
funny, I dont know old you are either. But then again, I dont care too much anyway.
root cause? ha ha. take credit for the war you guys started. you can name dems all day that voted for it. You seem to think I am a democrat or something. But I do know who dragged this country in iraq. And I HAVE been against it from the beginning! and you know what that makes me? RIGHT!
Being a DAD, I always taught my kids to be honest and stop with the excuse making. The way you neo cons characterize the WAR YOU STARTED shows me a desperate group of people running away from something they started and blaming everyone else! excuses abound! Deflections! Unfortunately for you, I DO REMEMBER Bush staring America in the eye at his State of the Union Adress and LYING to me and the rest of America! OWN UP TO IT, MAN!![]()
Own up to what?
excuses?
kids?
I have presented of factual history of the events that led up to the invasion of Iraq. At no time have I stated that people who are against the war are bad people or there wrong. The purpose of this thread iwas simple, and it was so simple that its scary
Your opinion on those evens are yours to keep. To protray those events in a in-accurate way and to do harm to the sacrifices those kids made to make this event a success is not
1) Saddam and his his weapons are gone
2) from that a republic in the middle east is born
Lies? what lies?
chill out
No you didn't dumb ass.kaz said:You didn't read my post, did you?
Neocon? I'm not a Republican, I'm against the wars and I'm against government spending. On the other hand you are a clueless moron.
Hey! this a fun forum where we can call each other names like clueless morons!
What would happen if I called you a clueless moron FIRST, before you got that amazingly mature insult in? Would I win the debate then?![]()
No you didn't dumb ass.kaz said:You didn't read my post, did you?
Yes, I did. There are even more eloquent neo cons than you making all kinds of excuses about the disaster of going into Iraq! Be proud of the war YOU REPUBS started!![]()
Neocon? I'm not a Republican, I'm against the wars and I'm against government spending. On the other hand you are a clueless moron.
No you didn't dumb ass.
Neocon? I'm not a Republican, I'm against the wars and I'm against government spending. On the other hand you are a clueless moron.
Hey! this a fun forum where we can call each other names like clueless morons!
What would happen if I called you a clueless moron FIRST, before you got that amazingly mature insult in? Would I win the debate then?![]()
You called me a Repub and a neocon and blamed me for the war for a post I wrote saying I was against the war, and you're complaining about the level of discourse? You're an idiotic ass hole who doesn't read posts before you respond to them. There was already no level of discourse so I decided to have fun. You're not that either.
No you didn't dumb ass.kaz said:You didn't read my post, did you?
Neocon? I'm not a Republican, I'm against the wars and I'm against government spending. On the other hand you are a clueless moron.
To start with to the both of you, the war in Iraq is over, we won
I am against foolish spending also.
from this voctory we have saved billions that makes no headlines
for one
BBC NEWS | Middle East | US pulls out of Saudi Arabia
in addition the failed job stimulus cost as much as the war in Iraq
we got a return on the war
CBO: Eight Years Of Iraq War Cost Less Than Stimulus Act | FoxNews.com
funny, I dont know old you are either. But then again, I dont care too much anyway.
root cause? ha ha. take credit for the war you guys started. you can name dems all day that voted for it. You seem to think I am a democrat or something. But I do know who dragged this country in iraq. And I HAVE been against it from the beginning! and you know what that makes me? RIGHT!
Being a DAD, I always taught my kids to be honest and stop with the excuse making. The way you neo cons characterize the WAR YOU STARTED shows me a desperate group of people running away from something they started and blaming everyone else! excuses abound! Deflections! Unfortunately for you, I DO REMEMBER Bush staring America in the eye at his State of the Union Adress and LYING to me and the rest of America! OWN UP TO IT, MAN!![]()
Own up to what?
excuses?
kids?
I have presented of factual history of the events that led up to the invasion of Iraq. At no time have I stated that people who are against the war are bad people or there wrong. The purpose of this thread iwas simple, and it was so simple that its scary
Your opinion on those evens are yours to keep. To protray those events in a in-accurate way and to do harm to the sacrifices those kids made to make this event a success is not
1) Saddam and his his weapons are gone
2) from that a republic in the middle east is born
Lies? what lies?
chill out
Well, since your opinon is so factual I wave my white flag!!!! ha ha hee hee!![]()
And destroy what evidence of wrongdoing was done our friends, relatives, and loved ones in NYC on 9/11/2001, plus risk a reattack if we are perceived as weak? I hope you rethink your position, unless you are a conscientious objector and cannot.No you didn't dumb ass.
Neocon? I'm not a Republican, I'm against the wars and I'm against government spending. On the other hand you are a clueless moron.
To start with to the both of you, the war in Iraq is over, we won
I am against foolish spending also.
from this voctory we have saved billions that makes no headlines
for one
BBC NEWS | Middle East | US pulls out of Saudi Arabia
in addition the failed job stimulus cost as much as the war in Iraq
we got a return on the war
CBO: Eight Years Of Iraq War Cost Less Than Stimulus Act | FoxNews.com
Since I am an isolationist all I know is we need to get out of the Middle East, Period.
And destroy what evidence of wrongdoing was done our friends, relatives, and loved ones in NYC on 9/11/2001, plus risk a reattack if we are perceived as weak? I hope you rethink your position, unless you are a conscientious objector and cannot.To start with to the both of you, the war in Iraq is over, we won
I am against foolish spending also.
from this voctory we have saved billions that makes no headlines
for one
BBC NEWS | Middle East | US pulls out of Saudi Arabia
in addition the failed job stimulus cost as much as the war in Iraq
we got a return on the war
CBO: Eight Years Of Iraq War Cost Less Than Stimulus Act | FoxNews.com
Since I am an isolationist all I know is we need to get out of the Middle East, Period.
Own up to what?
excuses?
kids?
I have presented of factual history of the events that led up to the invasion of Iraq. At no time have I stated that people who are against the war are bad people or there wrong. The purpose of this thread iwas simple, and it was so simple that its scary
Your opinion on those evens are yours to keep. To protray those events in a in-accurate way and to do harm to the sacrifices those kids made to make this event a success is not
1) Saddam and his his weapons are gone
2) from that a republic in the middle east is born
Lies? what lies?
chill out
Well, since your opinon is so factual I wave my white flag!!!! ha ha hee hee!![]()
you have not kept up with this thread, thats obvious
The US senate voting in favor of removing Saddam from power with force in 2002 is not an opinion
Blix speech 1-27-2003 is not an opinion
The DOD providing proof that there was WMDs that remained in Iraq in 2006 is not an opion
flying 30+ loads of "yeloow cake" out of Iraq in 2008 is not an opinion
Saddams own people hanging him is not an opinion
62% of the Iraqi people voting in the election in the year of our lord 2010 is not an opinion
still thik this is funny?