Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Defense spending benefits everyone in this country.you guys want to give more money to politicians who are irresponsible with everyone else's money...and you think that is a smart thing to do.....
There are always TWO issues in this debate: TAX REVENUE...and Gov. SPENDING.
Since by "you guys" you may mean left leaning posters on here, the premise you state is all wrong since we are not the rich and huge donors to a corrupt congress....Many of us have advocated for increasing taxes on those that have ridiculously of skewed the income inequalities and on those corporations that pay virtually NO taxes.........
Secondly, I for one agree that spending is out of control and waste is unconscionable.
However, right wingers want to cut the spending (social issues and entitlements) that benefit MILLIONS of Americans, while increasing "defense" (an euphemism since we are not really talking defense but Offense) spending which benefits mostly the same corporate donors who repeatedly and openly bribe congress.
Social spending doesnt benefit anyone except politicians.
You bunch of dumb asses are hilarious, you naïve sheep flail about trying to punish the rich but its not possible. What are you going to do raise their income taxes? They don't have much income, that's not where their money comes from. If you raise the capital gains tax they just sit on their investments, you don't pay the tax until you sell and realize the gain. Raising the capital gains tax does slam middle to upper middle class who can't afford to sit on their investments, bravo. Tax their businesses? Fine they just lay off the US workers and send the jobs off-shore and raise prices to cover the tax increase and delay making capital improvements and investments resulting in fewer jobs for you
Higher taxes = less transactions = Less revenues
Lower taxes = more transactions = More revenues
Demonstrating why narco-libertarians never get elected.Defense spending benefits everyone in this country.you guys want to give more money to politicians who are irresponsible with everyone else's money...and you think that is a smart thing to do.....
There are always TWO issues in this debate: TAX REVENUE...and Gov. SPENDING.
Since by "you guys" you may mean left leaning posters on here, the premise you state is all wrong since we are not the rich and huge donors to a corrupt congress....Many of us have advocated for increasing taxes on those that have ridiculously of skewed the income inequalities and on those corporations that pay virtually NO taxes.........
Secondly, I for one agree that spending is out of control and waste is unconscionable.
However, right wingers want to cut the spending (social issues and entitlements) that benefit MILLIONS of Americans, while increasing "defense" (an euphemism since we are not really talking defense but Offense) spending which benefits mostly the same corporate donors who repeatedly and openly bribe congress.
Social spending doesnt benefit anyone except politicians.
I disagree. Defense spending is a welfare system at this point. Like all welfare systems if you even try and talk about the problems of it and offer we cut even some of it you are destroyed.
There is no reason "defense" spending should be 600 billion + a year.
Fact is we have "Offense" spending. And that's not constitutional.
Idiot. The lower and middle classes dont pay income tax. In fact they get more from income tax than they pay in. How do you plan to cut taxes for people who dont pay any to begin with?Higher taxes = less transactions = Less revenues
Lower taxes = more transactions = More revenues
Written by a brain dead right winger......When was the last time you saw Trump using his "lower taxes" to buy a battery at Pep Boys?
Your scenario ONLY works if those lower taxes are for the lower and middle class.....
BUT, these latter people (including your sorry ass) do not BRIBE congress to lower their taxes......the real "lower taxes" benefits go to those who BOUGHT the congressional seat.
Can you explain your theory on that? It defies logic.Deficit spending produces tax revenue. You can't credit tax cuts with increases in revenue that are actually being caused by deficit spending.
When the government spends money jobs get created, profits get created, and taxes are generated from the same.
No...government doesn't create wealth because it takes money from actual productive activity.
When you spend more for a hammer than what it is actually worth, as government does...that money is unproductive and wasted. In the private sector that activity gets punished by a business going out of business...in government....they raise taxes and the people who wasted the money go on to waste even more money...so no...government doesn't generate more revenue with the tax money it takes from productive people.
Defense spending benefits everyone in this country.you guys want to give more money to politicians who are irresponsible with everyone else's money...and you think that is a smart thing to do.....
There are always TWO issues in this debate: TAX REVENUE...and Gov. SPENDING.
Since by "you guys" you may mean left leaning posters on here, the premise you state is all wrong since we are not the rich and huge donors to a corrupt congress....Many of us have advocated for increasing taxes on those that have ridiculously of skewed the income inequalities and on those corporations that pay virtually NO taxes.........
Secondly, I for one agree that spending is out of control and waste is unconscionable.
However, right wingers want to cut the spending (social issues and entitlements) that benefit MILLIONS of Americans, while increasing "defense" (an euphemism since we are not really talking defense but Offense) spending which benefits mostly the same corporate donors who repeatedly and openly bribe congress.
Social spending doesnt benefit anyone except politicians.
Sigh. I pwn you on this kind of stuff every single day here.Gee Barack Obama thinks it works that way. Are you saying he is a brain dead right winger?
If the above "premise" did not come out of your ass, then YES, I'd call him a brain dead right winger......
I disagree. Defense spending is a welfare system at this point. Like all welfare systems if you even try and talk about the problems of it and offer we cut even some of it you are destroyed.
There is no reason "defense" spending should be 600 billion + a year.
Fact is we have "Offense" spending. And that's not constitutional.
Do you have North Korean nukes raining down on your head? No.Defense spending benefits everyone in this country.you guys want to give more money to politicians who are irresponsible with everyone else's money...and you think that is a smart thing to do.....
There are always TWO issues in this debate: TAX REVENUE...and Gov. SPENDING.
Since by "you guys" you may mean left leaning posters on here, the premise you state is all wrong since we are not the rich and huge donors to a corrupt congress....Many of us have advocated for increasing taxes on those that have ridiculously of skewed the income inequalities and on those corporations that pay virtually NO taxes.........
Secondly, I for one agree that spending is out of control and waste is unconscionable.
However, right wingers want to cut the spending (social issues and entitlements) that benefit MILLIONS of Americans, while increasing "defense" (an euphemism since we are not really talking defense but Offense) spending which benefits mostly the same corporate donors who repeatedly and openly bribe congress.
Social spending doesnt benefit anyone except politicians.
What benefit did I get from the Iraq War?
What benefit am I getting from the US military presence in Korea and Japan?
Idiot. The lower and middle classes dont pay income tax. In fact they get more from income tax than they pay in. How do you plan to cut taxes for people who dont pay any to begin with?
Do you have North Korean nukes raining down on your head? No.Defense spending benefits everyone in this country.you guys want to give more money to politicians who are irresponsible with everyone else's money...and you think that is a smart thing to do.....
There are always TWO issues in this debate: TAX REVENUE...and Gov. SPENDING.
Since by "you guys" you may mean left leaning posters on here, the premise you state is all wrong since we are not the rich and huge donors to a corrupt congress....Many of us have advocated for increasing taxes on those that have ridiculously of skewed the income inequalities and on those corporations that pay virtually NO taxes.........
Secondly, I for one agree that spending is out of control and waste is unconscionable.
However, right wingers want to cut the spending (social issues and entitlements) that benefit MILLIONS of Americans, while increasing "defense" (an euphemism since we are not really talking defense but Offense) spending which benefits mostly the same corporate donors who repeatedly and openly bribe congress.
Social spending doesnt benefit anyone except politicians.
What benefit did I get from the Iraq War?
What benefit am I getting from the US military presence in Korea and Japan?
Are you able to buy lower cost products made with transistors from Korea? Yes.
There ya go.
Brain fart.
Bottom 47% of wage earners pay no income tax. I cant help it if you suck at life.Idiot. The lower and middle classes dont pay income tax. In fact they get more from income tax than they pay in. How do you plan to cut taxes for people who dont pay any to begin with?
Gee, if the above were true, then for 40 years of middle class status I did NOT pay any income taxes????
(Is this idiot for real???)
Bottom 47% of wage earners pay no income tax. I cant help it if you suck at life.Idiot. The lower and middle classes dont pay income tax. In fact they get more from income tax than they pay in. How do you plan to cut taxes for people who dont pay any to begin with?
Gee, if the above were true, then for 40 years of middle class status I did NOT pay any income taxes????
(Is this idiot for real???)
But you are avoiding answering my challenge on Obama. SO what is it?
OK your surrender on this topic, as will all topics you try to debate me, is noted and accepted.But you are avoiding answering my challenge on Obama. SO what is it?
Challenge??? From you????
As I've often stated, wrestling with pigs in a pig sty is not much fun....if you're not the pigs.
Do you have North Korean nukes raining down on your head? No.Defense spending benefits everyone in this country.you guys want to give more money to politicians who are irresponsible with everyone else's money...and you think that is a smart thing to do.....
There are always TWO issues in this debate: TAX REVENUE...and Gov. SPENDING.
Since by "you guys" you may mean left leaning posters on here, the premise you state is all wrong since we are not the rich and huge donors to a corrupt congress....Many of us have advocated for increasing taxes on those that have ridiculously of skewed the income inequalities and on those corporations that pay virtually NO taxes.........
Secondly, I for one agree that spending is out of control and waste is unconscionable.
However, right wingers want to cut the spending (social issues and entitlements) that benefit MILLIONS of Americans, while increasing "defense" (an euphemism since we are not really talking defense but Offense) spending which benefits mostly the same corporate donors who repeatedly and openly bribe congress.
Social spending doesnt benefit anyone except politicians.
What benefit did I get from the Iraq War?
What benefit am I getting from the US military presence in Korea and Japan?
Are you able to buy lower cost products made with transistors from Korea? Yes.
There ya go.
Brain fart.
You really just arent getting this, are you?Do you have North Korean nukes raining down on your head? No.Defense spending benefits everyone in this country.you guys want to give more money to politicians who are irresponsible with everyone else's money...and you think that is a smart thing to do.....
There are always TWO issues in this debate: TAX REVENUE...and Gov. SPENDING.
Since by "you guys" you may mean left leaning posters on here, the premise you state is all wrong since we are not the rich and huge donors to a corrupt congress....Many of us have advocated for increasing taxes on those that have ridiculously of skewed the income inequalities and on those corporations that pay virtually NO taxes.........
Secondly, I for one agree that spending is out of control and waste is unconscionable.
However, right wingers want to cut the spending (social issues and entitlements) that benefit MILLIONS of Americans, while increasing "defense" (an euphemism since we are not really talking defense but Offense) spending which benefits mostly the same corporate donors who repeatedly and openly bribe congress.
Social spending doesnt benefit anyone except politicians.
What benefit did I get from the Iraq War?
What benefit am I getting from the US military presence in Korea and Japan?
Are you able to buy lower cost products made with transistors from Korea? Yes.
There ya go.
Brain fart.
Are the nations who don't have troops in Korea barred from buying Korean products? lol
Rabbi is promoting putting US troops all over the world to protect the jobs we lost to foreign countries.
Brilliant.
