Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 37,606
- 22,469
- 2,945
Don't do the crimes if you can't pay the fines.
Uh, this was a civil case.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't do the crimes if you can't pay the fines.
Well golly gee is Mister WizardExcept the fine was against a corporation, not an individual.
Besides, Trump's a billionaire, he can afford it.
Maybe the word "fines" escapes you? UHUh, this was a civil case.
ME.Clearly he is being excessively punished. Who objectively would say otherwise?
What ad hom? You are wrong on this. The court may well increase them.When your argument is reduced to ad hominem, yup, I win.
This court was objective.An objective court of law? Put your hand on the bible and make that statement with all the conviction you can muster.
1. What big crimes? Saying your property is worth what the asking price is is done every day. You do NOT have to sell your property at the price the government says. Is MAL worth $18m? Judge Engeron is not a licensed appraiser.The fines are based on the level of fraud committed and the defendants' refusal to admit culpability. It's based on the legal principle
Do big crime
Get big fines
Trump can' of course, appeal if he can come up with $450M to pay the fines or buy the bond.
Not at all. In case you missed, it you are making the case for Trump by acknowledging the $350M is a fine.Maybe the word "fines" escapes you? UH
THAT is a lie.Especially given that there were no damages.
Read the findings, bow your head and cry.1. What big crimes? Saying your property is worth what the asking price is is done every day. You do NOT have to sell your property at the price the government says. Is MAL worth $18m? Judge Engeron is not a licensed appraiser.
2. I hope Elon loans the $500m to him out of his petty cash drawer.
What ad hom?
You are wrong on this. The court may well increase them.
When you step back and look at this logically, it sounds a lot like,
"You're accused of electioneering less than 500 feet from a polling place".
"Your honor, this elderly lady passed out while waiting in line and I gave her some water. When I did, a TRUMP! sticker fell out of my pocket".
"Yes, your honor, he made sure I was okay, and my family and I are very grateful for that. I didn't even see the sticker, and even if I had seen it, I had already decided how to vote".
"I find you guilty of electioneering, and because this lady might have been influenced by your TRUMP! sticker, I hereby fine you $500,000. Please pay the clerk on your way out. Case closed".
It's quite ridiculous when you look at it logically, away from the shrieking baboons hysterical that they might get to see blood they've been waiting years to see.
Have you gone door to door in NY validating this fantasy?Implying that the vast majority know what is going on. Whether they have the basic principles to public admit it or not is another issue altogether.
The world is rampant with cowardice. I am trying to be a Mensch at a time the world lost a Russian man who few knew but whose sacrifices will be known for a long time. I'm nostalgic that way, such men inspire me.
Thus I continue to refuse to be dishonest in such matters. I never wanted Trump to be the GOP nominee in 2016 but clearly he touched a nerve and confronted issues that politicians had ignored for decades. Without him there would be little discussion of China, your border, or unfair trading practices.
Don't blame him for his necessity, blame his predecessors.
Cwaiming vikory cause um's fee fees got hurt.When your argument is reduced to ad hominem, yup, I win.
FOOL!James is giving the $350M to the banks? Do tell.
Yeah, SCOTUS reads USMB on a daily basisNot at all. In case you missed, it you are making the case for Trump by acknowledging the $350M is a fine.
Nah, just mocking those with arguments rivaling those of a toddler (cough, cough)Cwaiming vikory cause um's fee fees got hurt.
AWWWWWWWWWW
Wow ... just ... wow.