Will The Democrats Finally Admit They Are a Socialist Party?

Name the conservatives who want to abolish public education.

all who want vouchers because our liberal public education turns out the dumbest kids in the civilized world.

Are you too stupid as a typical liberal to understand the being dumbest kids in civilized world is negative not positive??
 
Last edited:
You want a huge new taxpayer funded program consisting of billions of dollars worth of vouchers for education and that's your non-socialist alternative?

lol, that is priceless indeed.

100% stupid and illiterate as always. No new program is needed, you just give the money that is now used for schools to the parents as a voucher.

Its been in all the papers for 30 years and the perfect idiot liberal never understood it
See why we are positive that a liberal will be 100% stupid?
 
Your reality sucks. I thank god for our safety net,

100% stupid as always a safety net catches you when you fall and then you get off. Crippling inter generational welfare is a comfortable house not a safety net.

Do you have the IQ to understand?

So what would you replace Medicaid with?

workfare of course. When Clinton eliminated welfare as we know it by making it work fare fully half decided they no longer needed it.
Do you understand?

You want children, the disabled, and the elderly, who comprise the vast majority of Medicaid recipients, to have to work in order to get healthcare?

lol, that's funnier yet.
 
starting with public education.

100% stupid of course since conservatives want vouchers to begin to privatize the public education system that produces about the dumbest kids in the civilized world.
Libturds want the status quo since they cant admit failure even when it causes their kids to fail.

Name the conservatives who want to abolish public education.

all who want vouchers because our liberal public education turns out the dumbest kids in the civilized world.

Are you too stupid as a typical liberal to understand the being dumbest kids in civilized is negative not positive??


It's our way of doing things at the heart of why we produce idiots...Not because of government...Western Europe and Eastern Asia produce the top 10 best educated children and they're all government ran systems. ;) Can you understand? Many European countries give free college to their best.
 
Last edited:
You want children, the disabled, and the elderly, who comprise the vast majority of Medicaid recipients, to have to work in order to get healthcare?

lol, that's funnier yet.

if I said that i'll pay you $10,000. Bet or admit to being a stupid liberal liar.
 
Your reality sucks. I thank god for our safety net,

100% stupid as always a safety net catches you when you fall and then you get off. Crippling inter generational welfare is a comfortable house not a safety net.

Do you have the IQ to understand?

So what would you replace Medicaid with?

workfare of course. When Clinton eliminated welfare as we know it by making it work fare fully half decided they no longer needed it.
Do you understand?

You want children, the disabled, and the elderly, who comprise the vast majority of Medicaid recipients, to have to work in order to get healthcare?

lol, that's funnier yet.


He wants a unregulated corporate ran healthcare system that jacks up prices for only the rich and the lucky to have health insurance. The problem with his form of corporationism is competition without some regulations is wiped out as one or two businesses take over the industry. History proves this for the oil, phone, train and iron sectors...
 
It is our way of doing things at the heart of why we produce idiots...

so then we should do things differently so as not to produce idiots. did you know that 1+1=2

See why we are positive that a liberal will be stupid? What other conclusion is possible?
 
They are socialist capitalists...


Which means you control the means of production behind the scenes through very heavy Government regulation as well as picking winners and losers in the same manner.

Pure socialism that tries to hide the fact it is socialist.

Being socialist capitalists means they are socialists who think they are capitalists


Did the Romans collect taxes for construction of roads, walls and their military? You see social-democracy is the norm in civilization. Name a nation that has over 20,000 dollar per capita income for its people that isn't a social-democracy??? If you can't then explain to me why we should have a unregulated economy where the same corporations that screw up the environment of china and india are allowed to run wild.

You forgot the rim shot after you said if we don't want Marxism we get anarchy

Here you go again seeing things in black and white. Is there a private sector in Germany, Briton, Sweden, Italy, south Korea, Japan, and most of the rest of the modern first world??? IF so then your idea of two shades falls apart and your belief system is a joke.

People like you that want no regulations want a form of economic anarchy.

You are an idiot, Marxists usually are
 
Insolvency, yes, but due to baby boomer greed? Really? I guess you don't think those that have paid into for years sure receive their benefits? Or do you mean the stealing from the fund? If so, that started before the baby boomers. )LBJ and his democratically controlled congress came up with that scheme. And it was dear Carter that decided immigrants could receive ss at age 65, even though never paying a dime into it.
Sure. Social Security and fire departments are pure socialism. You against those too?

Many fire departments, particularly in the northeast where I am originally from, are volunteer forces. As for Social Security, yes, I do oppose it because it is heading towards insolvency due to Baby Boomer greed and I will never be able to withdraw a dime that I have put into it.
 
Which means you control the means of production behind the scenes through very heavy Government regulation as well as picking winners and losers in the same manner.

Pure socialism that tries to hide the fact it is socialist.

Being socialist capitalists means they are socialists who think they are capitalists


Did the Romans collect taxes for construction of roads, walls and their military? You see social-democracy is the norm in civilization. Name a nation that has over 20,000 dollar per capita income for its people that isn't a social-democracy??? If you can't then explain to me why we should have a unregulated economy where the same corporations that screw up the environment of china and india are allowed to run wild.

You forgot the rim shot after you said if we don't want Marxism we get anarchy

Here you go again seeing things in black and white. Is there a private sector in Germany, Briton, Sweden, Italy, south Korea, Japan, and most of the rest of the modern first world??? IF so then your idea of two shades falls apart and your belief system is a joke.

People like you that want no regulations want a form of economic anarchy.

You are an idiot, Marxists usually are


Lol, that is all you can say as you suck on corporate cock. hahaha I have no problem with regulated corporations but you really take it to the next level.
 
Oh, btw, in reality, the biggest socialist institution in the US is the military.

100% stupid of course since the military is not thought of as an industry. socialism is when the liberal govt owns and manages an industries. Do you understand?

Defense is one of our largest industries


Very much a government/private sector agreement!!! A good one...I like it. But it proves that some social democracy is part of reality.
 
Being socialist capitalists means they are socialists who think they are capitalists


Did the Romans collect taxes for construction of roads, walls and their military? You see social-democracy is the norm in civilization. Name a nation that has over 20,000 dollar per capita income for its people that isn't a social-democracy??? If you can't then explain to me why we should have a unregulated economy where the same corporations that screw up the environment of china and india are allowed to run wild.

You forgot the rim shot after you said if we don't want Marxism we get anarchy

Here you go again seeing things in black and white. Is there a private sector in Germany, Briton, Sweden, Italy, south Korea, Japan, and most of the rest of the modern first world??? IF so then your idea of two shades falls apart and your belief system is a joke.

People like you that want no regulations want a form of economic anarchy.

You are an idiot, Marxists usually are


Lol, that is all you can say as you suck on corporate cock. hahaha I have no problem with regulated corporations but you really take it to the next level.

You're just babbling Marxist bilch. If you can come up with something coherent I'd be glad to address it. BTW, I am corporate, I'll pass on the blow job, but thanks for the offer
 
it's comical to me; they get so butthurt when you call them socialists, and start crying that you don't know what Socialism is; but they wont just come out and say they are Socialists, own it

You've been invited to tell us what you think is Socialism.

Name the socialist programs currently in place in the US.
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, all Welfare programs, Obamacare, just about everything government does, really
Obamacare uses private insurance companies. Single payer would be Socialized Medicine.
 
it's comical to me; they get so butthurt when you call them socialists, and start crying that you don't know what Socialism is; but they wont just come out and say they are Socialists, own it

You've been invited to tell us what you think is Socialism.

Name the socialist programs currently in place in the US.
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, all Welfare programs, Obamacare, just about everything government does, really
Obamacare uses private insurance companies. Single payer would be Socialized Medicine.
Obamacare is the government dictating to insurance companies whom they must cover and under what terms. That is dead-cold socialism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top