Will The Democrats Finally Admit They Are a Socialist Party?

I was thinking not of poster's definitions but of a more scholarly type, perhaps how most economists define socialism.
 
Hate to go through all those posts, but did anyone define socialism, or even try? Did anyone list the nations that do not have any type of socialism?


I have defined the Democrat Party version of Socialism. No one on the left here at USMB will touch it. Too scared. :lol:


funny-scared-face.jpg

Your idea of capitalism is selling out American businesses to south Asia and making shit for pennies. People like you wish to sweep the success of the 1940s through 70s under a rug as it shows the success of social-democracy in making a powerful nation that also makes a large percentage of its people wealthy enough to have a good life.

The same can be said about many western European nation....

Offshoring is good for the economy, Holmes, economic efficiency always is. Your trust in government is just staggeringly naive
 
I was thinking not of poster's definitions but of a more scholarly type, perhaps how most economists define socialism.

Then why did you ask posters instead of looking it up yourself? Laziness?
 
It's kind of hard to get offended by the label anymore when you've got thousands of enthusiastic Democrats lining up to hear Bernie Sanders' populist Scandinavian style welfare state plan for our nation. The man is, after all, the only self admitted Socialist elected to the U.S. Senate and he is edging closer and closer to toppling Hillary each day.

They are socialist capitalists...


Which means you control the means of production behind the scenes through very heavy Government regulation as well as picking winners and losers in the same manner.

Pure socialism that tries to hide the fact it is socialist.

Being socialist capitalists means they are socialists who think they are capitalists


Did the Romans collect taxes for construction of roads, walls and their military? You see social-democracy is the norm in civilization. Name a nation that has over 20,000 dollar per capita income for its people that isn't a social-democracy??? If you can't then explain to me why we should have a unregulated economy, where the same corporations that screw up the environment of china and india are allowed to run wild.
 
Hate to go through all those posts, but did anyone define socialism, or even try? Did anyone list the nations that do not have any type of socialism?


I have defined the Democrat Party version of Socialism. No one on the left here at USMB will touch it. Too scared. :lol:


funny-scared-face.jpg

Exactly. OMG, I can't make my own decisions, I might make the wrong one! I need someone I can trust! Politicians, HELP!!!!
 
It's kind of hard to get offended by the label anymore when you've got thousands of enthusiastic Democrats lining up to hear Bernie Sanders' populist Scandinavian style welfare state plan for our nation. The man is, after all, the only self admitted Socialist elected to the U.S. Senate and he is edging closer and closer to toppling Hillary each day.

They are socialist capitalists...


Which means you control the means of production behind the scenes through very heavy Government regulation as well as picking winners and losers in the same manner.

Pure socialism that tries to hide the fact it is socialist.

Being socialist capitalists means they are socialists who think they are capitalists


Did the Romans collect taxes for construction of roads, walls and their military? You see social-democracy is the norm in civilization. Name a nation that has over 20,000 dollar per capita income for its people that isn't a social-democracy??? If you can't then explain to me why we should have a unregulated economy where the same corporations that screw up the environment of china and india are allowed to run wild.

You forgot the rim shot after you said if we don't want Marxism we get anarchy
 
Maxine Waters (D) Slip of the Tongue Reveals True Intentions (Socialism for America)




I'm sure most of you remember this moment, lol.



Well, there are people in the democratic party that would love a more command economy. As of this moment in history a good ass beating for some of the treasonous corporations wouldn't be a bad idea,,,,but this just adds more support to the reality that there isn't two flavors of economics.
 
It's kind of hard to get offended by the label anymore when you've got thousands of enthusiastic Democrats lining up to hear Bernie Sanders' populist Scandinavian style welfare state plan for our nation. The man is, after all, the only self admitted Socialist elected to the U.S. Senate and he is edging closer and closer to toppling Hillary each day.

They are socialist capitalists...


Which means you control the means of production behind the scenes through very heavy Government regulation as well as picking winners and losers in the same manner.

Pure socialism that tries to hide the fact it is socialist.

Being socialist capitalists means they are socialists who think they are capitalists


Did the Romans collect taxes for construction of roads, walls and their military? You see social-democracy is the norm in civilization. Name a nation that has over 20,000 dollar per capita income for its people that isn't a social-democracy??? If you can't then explain to me why we should have a unregulated economy where the same corporations that screw up the environment of china and india are allowed to run wild.

You forgot the rim shot after you said if we don't want Marxism we get anarchy

Here you go again seeing things in black and white. Is there a private sector in Germany, Briton, Sweden, Italy, south Korea, Japan, and most of the rest of the modern first world??? IF so then your idea of two shades falls apart and your belief system is a joke.

People like you that want no regulations want a form of economic anarchy.
 
Tell me why shouldn't the people of the society that enjoy driving on the roads not pay taxes??? Answer me that...I am sure mr.liberterian also likes doing so....
 
Will the republicans ever admit they are a Fascist party?

how embarrassing, a political junkie but still too stupid to know Republicans are for tiny govt and so the opposite of fascists.

Does the liberal even know that being stupid is not a good thing. Would you want a stupid doctor??
 
Your reality sucks. I thank god for our safety net,

100% stupid as always a safety net catches you when you fall and then you get off. Crippling inter generational welfare is a comfortable house not a safety net.

Do you have the IQ to understand?
 
regulations against what corporations would like to do. You're a nut case.

Google for example would like to invent the driverless car and thus save 100,000 lives a year. Corporations are the source of the inventions that got us from the stone age to here.

You are a brain washed Marxist puppet and far too stupid to see what they have done to you.
 
It's kind of hard to get offended by the label anymore when you've got thousands of enthusiastic Democrats lining up to hear Bernie Sanders' populist Scandinavian style welfare state plan for our nation. The man is, after all, the only self admitted Socialist elected to the U.S. Senate and he is edging closer and closer to toppling Hillary each day.

Define the standard for determining if a political party should be rightly described as socialist, and then everyone can decide whether or not the Democratic Party fits that definition.


You said last week you'd define it but you pussied out. :lol: The Dim Party is now socialist. Case closed.

You won't define it because you know you'll end up having to identify current programs as socialist that even the vast majority of conservatives don't want to end,

starting with public education.
 
Your reality sucks. I thank god for our safety net,

100% stupid as always a safety net catches you when you fall and then you get off. Crippling inter generational welfare is a comfortable house not a safety net.

Do you have the IQ to understand?

So what would you replace Medicaid with?

The street is what he'd replace it with. This asshole wants work or die to be the reality again.

What sucks even more about that is the workers get fucked and work for hardly enough to survive.
 
starting with public education.

100% stupid of course since conservatives want vouchers to begin to privatize the public education system that produces about the dumbest kids in the civilized world.
Libturds want the status quo since they cant admit failure even when it causes their kids to fail.
 
starting with public education.

100% stupid of course since conservatives want vouchers to begin to privatize the public education system that produces about the dumbest kids in the civilized world.
Libturds want the status quo since they cant admit failure even when it causes their kids to fail.

Name the conservatives who want to abolish public education.
 
starting with public education.

100% stupid of course since conservatives want vouchers to begin to privatize the public education system that produces about the dumbest kids in the civilized world.
Libturds want the status quo since they cant admit failure even when it causes their kids to fail.

You want a huge new taxpayer funded program consisting of billions of dollars worth of vouchers for education and that's your non-socialist alternative?

lol, that is priceless indeed.
 
Your reality sucks. I thank god for our safety net,

100% stupid as always a safety net catches you when you fall and then you get off. Crippling inter generational welfare is a comfortable house not a safety net.

Do you have the IQ to understand?

So what would you replace Medicaid with?

workfare of course. When Clinton eliminated welfare as we know it by making it work fare fully half decided they no longer needed it.
Do you understand?
 

Forum List

Back
Top