Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
97 percent claim = hoax
Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims
Comment Now
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Global warming alarmists and their allies in the liberal media have been caught doctoring the results of a widely cited paper asserting there is a 97-percent scientific consensus regarding human-caused global warming.
After taking a closer look at the paper, investigative journalists report the authors’ claims of a 97-pecent consensus relied on the authors misclassifying the papers of some of the world’s most prominent global warming skeptics.
At the same time, the authors deliberately presented a meaningless survey question so they could twist the responses to fit their own preconceived global warming alarmism.
Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring 97-Percent Consensus Claims - Forbes
I love rdean threads!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is there a scientific consensus on global warming
Subsequent research has confirmed this result. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate changeresponded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.
-------------------------------------------------------
I was watching a montage of Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, John Beohner and Ted Cruz all saying, "I'm not a scientist, but....."
Only God can control the climate.
Evolution is a lie.
Climate change a conspiracy,
Science a faith.
Vaccines cause autism.
Where do Republicans get their scientific knowledge from?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Things You May Not Know About the Dust Bowl History in the Headlines
While “black blizzards” constantly menaced Plains states in the 1930s, a massive dust storm 2 miles high traveled 2,000 miles before hitting the East Coast on May 11, 1934. For five hours, a fog of prairie dirt enshrouded landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the U.S. Capitol, inside which lawmakers were debating a soil conservation bill.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Is there a scientific consensus on global warming
Subsequent research has confirmed this result. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate changeresponded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.
-------------------------------------------------------
I was watching a montage of Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, John Beohner and Ted Cruz all saying, "I'm not a scientist, but....."
Only God can control the climate.
Evolution is a lie.
Climate change a conspiracy,
Science a faith.
Vaccines cause autism.
Where do Republicans get their scientific knowledge from?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Things You May Not Know About the Dust Bowl History in the Headlines
While “black blizzards” constantly menaced Plains states in the 1930s, a massive dust storm 2 miles high traveled 2,000 miles before hitting the East Coast on May 11, 1934. For five hours, a fog of prairie dirt enshrouded landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the U.S. Capitol, inside which lawmakers were debating a soil conservation bill.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Wow....now there's a surprise. Liberal scientist making a living off the government.
Is there a scientific consensus on global warming
Subsequent research has confirmed this result. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate changeresponded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.
-------------------------------------------------------
I was watching a montage of Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, John Beohner and Ted Cruz all saying, "I'm not a scientist, but....."
Only God can control the climate.
Evolution is a lie.
Climate change a conspiracy,
Science a faith.
Vaccines cause autism.
Where do Republicans get their scientific knowledge from?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Things You May Not Know About the Dust Bowl History in the Headlines
While “black blizzards” constantly menaced Plains states in the 1930s, a massive dust storm 2 miles high traveled 2,000 miles before hitting the East Coast on May 11, 1934. For five hours, a fog of prairie dirt enshrouded landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the U.S. Capitol, inside which lawmakers were debating a soil conservation bill.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Wow....now there's a surprise. Liberal scientist making a living off the government.
Yea, like defense and NASA and the Centers for Disease Control. Oh those liberal scientists. Who needs 'em?
Is there a scientific consensus on global warming
Subsequent research has confirmed this result. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate changeresponded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.
-------------------------------------------------------
I was watching a montage of Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, John Beohner and Ted Cruz all saying, "I'm not a scientist, but....."
Only God can control the climate.
Evolution is a lie.
Climate change a conspiracy,
Science a faith.
Vaccines cause autism.
Where do Republicans get their scientific knowledge from?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Things You May Not Know About the Dust Bowl History in the Headlines
While “black blizzards” constantly menaced Plains states in the 1930s, a massive dust storm 2 miles high traveled 2,000 miles before hitting the East Coast on May 11, 1934. For five hours, a fog of prairie dirt enshrouded landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the U.S. Capitol, inside which lawmakers were debating a soil conservation bill.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Wow....now there's a surprise. Liberal scientist making a living off the government.
Yea, like defense and NASA and the Centers for Disease Control. Oh those liberal scientists. Who needs 'em?
Hmmmm....liberal scientist building weapons of war. Sounds hypocritical....
Is there a scientific consensus on global warming
Subsequent research has confirmed this result. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate changeresponded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.
-------------------------------------------------------
I was watching a montage of Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, John Beohner and Ted Cruz all saying, "I'm not a scientist, but....."
Only God can control the climate.
Evolution is a lie.
Climate change a conspiracy,
Science a faith.
Vaccines cause autism.
Where do Republicans get their scientific knowledge from?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Things You May Not Know About the Dust Bowl History in the Headlines
While “black blizzards” constantly menaced Plains states in the 1930s, a massive dust storm 2 miles high traveled 2,000 miles before hitting the East Coast on May 11, 1934. For five hours, a fog of prairie dirt enshrouded landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the U.S. Capitol, inside which lawmakers were debating a soil conservation bill.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Wow....now there's a surprise. Liberal scientist making a living off the government.
Yea, like defense and NASA and the Centers for Disease Control. Oh those liberal scientists. Who needs 'em?
Hmmmm....liberal scientist building weapons of war. Sounds hypocritical....
And yet it happens. Look at Red States. What could you trust a Republican to design or build? They believe science is a "faith".
Is there a scientific consensus on global warming
Subsequent research has confirmed this result. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate changeresponded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.
-------------------------------------------------------
I was watching a montage of Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, John Beohner and Ted Cruz all saying, "I'm not a scientist, but....."
Only God can control the climate.
Evolution is a lie.
Climate change a conspiracy,
Science a faith.
Vaccines cause autism.
Where do Republicans get their scientific knowledge from?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Things You May Not Know About the Dust Bowl History in the Headlines
While “black blizzards” constantly menaced Plains states in the 1930s, a massive dust storm 2 miles high traveled 2,000 miles before hitting the East Coast on May 11, 1934. For five hours, a fog of prairie dirt enshrouded landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the U.S. Capitol, inside which lawmakers were debating a soil conservation bill.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Wow....now there's a surprise. Liberal scientist making a living off the government.
Yea, like defense and NASA and the Centers for Disease Control. Oh those liberal scientists. Who needs 'em?
Hmmmm....liberal scientist building weapons of war. Sounds hypocritical....
And yet it happens. Look at Red States. What could you trust a Republican to design or build? They believe science is a "faith".
Slidell, Louisiana is red.
Textron Marine Land Systems - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
So since winter still exists, this is your "proof" that global climate change is a hoax?In this cold snap, place a six pack outside and will be a cool, crisp 33 degrees in about five minutes.
When will you morons give up this retarded talking point? Where did it come from in the first place?No warming for 18 years.
CO2 up every year.
Get lost dick wad.
When will you morons give up this retarded talking point? Where did it come from in the first place?No warming for 18 years.
CO2 up every year.
Get lost dick wad.
I'll walk you through it. Go to this web site:
Climate at a Glance National Climatic Data Center NCDC
Pick a start year of 1996 and an end year of 2014. Pick any month you like. Use land, ocean or land and ocean. Check the 'Display Trend' button then hit 'plot'.
Whaddya know, it's going up.
So since winter still exists, this is your "proof" that global climate change is a hoax?In this cold snap, place a six pack outside and will be a cool, crisp 33 degrees in about five minutes.
im not a scientist but.....you sure are obsessed with Republicans.....Is there a scientific consensus on global warming
Subsequent research has confirmed this result. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate changeresponded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.
-------------------------------------------------------
I was watching a montage of Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, John Beohner and Ted Cruz all saying, "I'm not a scientist, but....."
Only God can control the climate.
Evolution is a lie.
Climate change a conspiracy,
Science a faith.
Vaccines cause autism.
Where do Republicans get their scientific knowledge from?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Things You May Not Know About the Dust Bowl History in the Headlines
While “black blizzards” constantly menaced Plains states in the 1930s, a massive dust storm 2 miles high traveled 2,000 miles before hitting the East Coast on May 11, 1934. For five hours, a fog of prairie dirt enshrouded landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the U.S. Capitol, inside which lawmakers were debating a soil conservation bill.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Who the hell is Climate Depot? Sounds like a right wing denier site. I think I'll stick with NOAA thanks.When will you morons give up this retarded talking point? Where did it come from in the first place?No warming for 18 years.
CO2 up every year.
Get lost dick wad.
I'll walk you through it. Go to this web site:
Climate at a Glance National Climatic Data Center NCDC
Pick a start year of 1996 and an end year of 2014. Pick any month you like. Use land, ocean or land and ocean. Check the 'Display Trend' button then hit 'plot'.
Whaddya know, it's going up.
"
Global Temperature Update: No global warming at all for 17 years 9 months
Global Temperature Update No global warming at all for 17 years 9 months Climate Depot
Dueling sources YEAH!!!!!
