TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
What? None of those women are in favor of women being able to choose. Now you're just flat out lying.I can do you better.
There are Republican women. Palin, Rice, Bachmann, Mia Love, Deneen Borelli and company.
And once the woman has the child, you suddenly "don't give a damn" and incentivize them by putting them on Welfare. Welfare isn't a boon, it is a ball and chain. Should your party resume caring, you'll make the parents find ways to support their children instead of keeping them on the government dole. Hey, you're pro-choice until the child is born, and pro entitlement afterwards.
We don't put anyone on welfare. If the people aren't able to work or can't make enough money, they put themselves on welfare. Quit lying.
Oh, and how can we not "give a damn" when Democrats haven't even extended unemployment benefits yet? I though they "cared"? Nobody has a choice when they're under the thumb of government.
If your party gave a damn they would not have suggested such huge cuts to Food Stamps, Welfare and other programs that help the poor. But your claim that Democrats have not extended unemployment benefits is either ignorance on your part or willful dishonest. Republicans are the ones that are keeping the unemployment benefits bill from passing.
The White House said it was disappointed in the development, blaming Republicans. President Barack Obama and Democrats have been pressing for an extension of the recession-era program that expired in December.
"We will continue to work with both sides to find a solution because the cost of inaction is simply too high," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.
Proponents argue that leaving long-term jobless Americans without a safety net was unacceptable and would also harm the economy since there would be less money for them to spend on goods and services.
According to a Quinnipiac University survey released last week, voters supported by a 58%-37% margin extending unemployment benefits for three months.
There was a partisan divide: Support was 83%-13% among Democrats and 54%-41% among Independent voters, with Republicans opposed 54%-42%.
Extending unemployment benefits stumbles in Senate ? CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Democrats slam Republicans for not extending Emergency Unemployment Compensation Fund - NY Daily News
And don't bother to respond if you're going to be posting lies.
One big problem, Mert, the Senate is controlled by the Democrats, 53 D, 45 R. Your polls be damned, milady. Instead of working on a compromise, Democrats sat there and played the blame game. They didn't work in good faith to strike a deal, and in my mind, didn't want to. Had they given a damn, miss, they would have had this wrapped up and put under the tree for the holidays.
The women I named, are women. Being Republicans don't make them any less of a woman. I'm not lying. I'm disproving the notion that your party has a monopoly on the female species. Women's rights as you define them aren't strictly confined to abortifacients, or abortions.
Some people can work, and should be working, but they are begging for more welfare and food stamps. If your party ever gave a flying rat's hide, they'd put able bodied people to work, not feed their self-pity and lack of self worth with welfare checks and food stamps. Come on now. Jay Carney is a paid liar. He lies for money. Quoting him is like citing citing Obama's "if you like it you can keep it" line. He's a liar. Since when has Obama ever worked with the other side?
And what good does swapping money do? When you give them money, they spend the money, you tax the money, and you wind up GETTING LESS OF IT BACK. So, how does this stimulate anything? How are you making any of them rich by subsidizing them?