Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Insurance is not free. I don't have viagra covered on My insurance, nor do I want it.He says that because he can't read. None of them can.
I don't care if a woman needs birth control, or just wants birth control. However, SHE can PAY for her own birth control. No one else.
Free with insurance.
The men need to stop having Viagra covered by insurance.
I pay for medications out of pocket, I never use My insurance for it.
One last time. If you want or need birth control, pay for it yourself. I don't care how you pay for it, as long as I AM NOT paying for it.
So if birth control is a die hard guarantee that women won't have unexpected babies...why are there more unexpected babies now than there were in the days before birth control was available?
In other words, your argument sucks.
Insurance is not free. I don't have viagra covered on My insurance, nor do I want it.Free with insurance.
The men need to stop having Viagra covered by insurance.
I pay for medications out of pocket, I never use My insurance for it.
One last time. If you want or need birth control, pay for it yourself. I don't care how you pay for it, as long as I AM NOT paying for it.
Are you saying your insurance covers your medications, but you don't use your insurance to pay for it?
What is it with Republicans and birth control?
It has been 50 years and they still can't figure it out?
Birth control is not about women not being able to control their libido. It is not about women being sluts
It is about responsible parenthood. Something republicans should be in favor of
Then they should be responsible and pay for it themselves. Nearly everyone knows that it's not that expensive.
But progressives are nothing, if not for being the cheapest of cheapskates.
Why?
We are talking about insurance. Why shouldnt insurance pay for birth control?
It is cheaper than unwanted pregnancy. cheaper than paying for additional children
Why are Republucans so afraid of responsible parenthood?
Birth control is cheaper for insurance than paying for a pregnancy.
it is cheaper than paying for a delivery
Yeah, you already said that.For the same reason that auto insurance shouldn't pay for oil changes.Why?
We are talking about insurance. Why shouldnt insurance pay for birth control?
It is cheaper than unwanted pregnancy. cheaper than paying for additional children
Why are Republucans so afraid of responsible parenthood?
That oil changes are cheaper than a new engine is self-evident. If you're too much of a cheapskate to get oil changes, it's not the fault of those who do that you roach out your engine.
Quit being such a tightwad.
Birth control is cheaper for insurance than paying for a pregnancy.
it is cheaper than paying for a delivery
And guess what conservatIves? If a woman uses birth control.......She doesn't need an abortion
but go on.....women who use birth control,are sex maniacs and dare I say it?
Sluts
So if birth control is a die hard guarantee that women won't have unexpected babies...why are there more unexpected babies now than there were in the days before birth control was available?
In other words, your argument sucks.
I swear to the risen christ we no longer want to win elections.
And you have gutlessness issues.Then they should be responsible and pay for it themselves. Nearly everyone knows that it's not that expensive.
But progressives are nothing, if not for being the cheapest of cheapskates.
Why?
We are talking about insurance. Why shouldnt insurance pay for birth control?
It is cheaper than unwanted pregnancy. cheaper than paying for additional children
Why are Republucans so afraid of responsible parenthood?
They have control issues, methinks.
Only to flaming tightwads.Birth control is cheaper for insurance than paying for a pregnancy.
it is cheaper than paying for a delivery
And market forces ought to be determining whether it's worth it for insurance companies to include BC coverage.
Gracious but that's a ridiculous idea.
Then they should be responsible and pay for it themselves. Nearly everyone knows that it's not that expensive.
But progressives are nothing, if not for being the cheapest of cheapskates.
Why?
We are talking about insurance. Why shouldnt insurance pay for birth control?
It is cheaper than unwanted pregnancy. cheaper than paying for additional children
Why are Republucans so afraid of responsible parenthood?
They have control issues, methinks.
Birth control is cheaper for insurance than paying for a pregnancy.
it is cheaper than paying for a delivery
And market forces ought to be determining whether it's worth it for insurance companies to include BC coverage.
Gracious but that's a ridiculous idea.
So what?Insurance is not free. I don't have viagra covered on My insurance, nor do I want it.
I pay for medications out of pocket, I never use My insurance for it.
One last time. If you want or need birth control, pay for it yourself. I don't care how you pay for it, as long as I AM NOT paying for it.
Apples and oranges.
One causes an erection and nothing else (as far as I know). Contraceptives are hormones and have dual effects; contraceptive and therapeutic; not therapeutic alone.
Pay for both by yourselves, you cheapskates!
1) Because she's a cheapskate.And market forces ought to be determining whether it's worth it for insurance companies to include BC coverage.
Gracious but that's a ridiculous idea.
Why?
Crap.So what?Apples and oranges.
One causes an erection and nothing else (as far as I know). Contraceptives are hormones and have dual effects; contraceptive and therapeutic; not therapeutic alone.
Pay for both by yourselves, you cheapskates!
You pay for your drug plan through your insurance premiums.
The reason viagra isn't on the list of meds covered is that there isn't a therapeutic use for it that is widely recognized. The reason contraceptives (some) should be on is because there is a therapeutic use.
I, personally, believe that happiness that men gain through erections (use your imagination) is therapeutic and should be on drug plans myself.
Crap.So what?
Pay for both by yourselves, you cheapskates!
You pay for your drug plan through your insurance premiums.
The reason viagra isn't on the list of meds covered is that there isn't a therapeutic use for it that is widely recognized. The reason contraceptives (some) should be on is because there is a therapeutic use.
I, personally, believe that happiness that men gain through erections (use your imagination) is therapeutic and should be on drug plans myself.
Pay for your own medications and the prices will come down.
The best recent example of that is Cliratin: When it was prescription and covered by insurance plans, it was expensive. When it went OTC, the price plummeted.
Object lesson. Wake the hell up.
Insurance doesn't pay for OTC.Crap.You pay for your drug plan through your insurance premiums.
The reason viagra isn't on the list of meds covered is that there isn't a therapeutic use for it that is widely recognized. The reason contraceptives (some) should be on is because there is a therapeutic use.
I, personally, believe that happiness that men gain through erections (use your imagination) is therapeutic and should be on drug plans myself.
Pay for your own medications and the prices will come down.
The best recent example of that is Cliratin: When it was prescription and covered by insurance plans, it was expensive. When it went OTC, the price plummeted.
Object lesson. Wake the hell up.
And you think paying for your own medications is going to cause them to be switched to OTC?