Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Again, find me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that rejects the reality of AGW in their policy statements.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why yes, it is. And so is a knowledge of history. For there was a time in this nation when our cities and rivers were very polluted. Not just CO2 and CH4, but smog so thick that it was a hazard for breathing. And a river so polluted that it burned as it flowed through a city.Reading comprehension is essential.Again, 'Alternative Facts' smell just like where they came from.The idiot of the year award goes to.......SNOWFLAKE SCIENTISTS LIED IN ORDER TO GET FUNDING.
It's not very complex.
When the left doesn't have the proper stats, they just lie.
YES, those damn scientists even faked these photos.......damn them...LOL
Do you realize that polar bears can swim? That the picture of the polar bear proves nothing? More fake information from you.
The other picture depicts smog. Smog is NOx (: a fog made heavier and darker by smoke and chemical fumes; also : a photochemical haze caused by the action of solar ultraviolet radiation on atmosphere polluted with hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen especially from automobile exhaust) not carbon dioxide.
It also provides the very foundational part of the argument about climate change. Until you get China and India and other nations who are thousands of times larger polluters than the United States, any government involvement on our part is for the benefit of the rich, not the world.
Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions | US EPA
Now you in the GOP wish to go back to that time. Oh yes, eliminate the EPA, and we can enjoy those good times again. What fucked up idiots you are.
why, they don't represent the scientists. post one with a scientist name on it.Again, find me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that rejects the reality of AGW in their policy statements.
ANY criticism of right wingers' rejection of science will, henceforth, be called "fake news".......Please adhere to that new policy.
So, expecting evidence and actual testing is "rejection of science" where your acceptance of dogma on faith is what you think science is, gnat?
[
No. no....don't get me wrong, I DO want for you to roast your nuts as the ozone layer is pierced.....
Great. So you think fake data that defrauds the public and dupes them into giving money to the greedy priests of your church will achieve your goal?
[
No. We reject your denier fake data.
How about the lie in the below quote from the OP. Is that fake enough for you?How do you know it's fake news? Maybe NOAA actually did rush the report?
Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”
Are you saying the buoys have did show a warming trend? If so, can you prove it / prove Curry wrong?How about the lie in the below quote from the OP. Is that fake enough for you?
Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”
Which is, of course a LIE!!!!!NOA DID fake the data...again.
Can't you read the chart?????Are you saying the buoys have did show a warming trend? If so, can you prove it / prove Curry wrong?How about the lie in the below quote from the OP. Is that fake enough for you?
Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”
And don't forget the whistleblower and author of the British article fabricated a fake graph as proof!!!!!It is ALWAYS interesting when a "whistle blower" goes to a BRITISH newspaper to blow the whistle, and the story is picked up by a right wing rag like Daily Caller to have right wing idiots SWEAR that the entire global warming is a myth......LOL
Fake graph from your fake news article.World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online
Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data
- The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming
- It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
- America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
- The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data
and they deny reality.[
No. We reject your denier fake data.
Yes, data is from denier infidels, You of the faithful must be guarded against data and facts. The dogma of your cult is the only thing tha you can read.
The devil is trying to trick you with all of those facts, statics and actual experiments. You are the faithful, you serve Gaia and ensure that only what the cult tells you ever reaches your brain.
Blind faith is what you have, never question, never test. You are an AGW cultist, you follow the truthiness of the faith. (filth?)
Notice the deniers do not even deny that the graph is a fake!!!!!!!Fake graph from your fake news article.World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online
Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data
- The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming
- It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
- America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
- The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data
And don't forget the whistleblower and author of the British article fabricated a fake graph as proof!!!!!
If GW was a myth why do deniers NEED to make FAKE graphs??????
Reading these threads is almost as much fun as going through 1940's Life Magazines and reading cigarette company ads in which 9 out of 10 doctors who smoke recommend Camels for their patients who smoke, because they are milder, and smoother and less irritating to the throat..
and the cigarettes still sell today at about the same if not greater rate than when those commercials were pulled. hmmmmm why is that?