Worst day EVER in this forum for AGW devotee's

The above comes from an expert on stupid...

He's been stupid his whole life....
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.

A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.


While your analogy makes no sense,

It’s consistent with all your other retorts….
Lol, I think someone needs to look up the definition of "analogy".


That would be you Dip Shit.....
Doubling down on stupid is still stupid, stupid.

You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
 
Consistent reducto absurdum .....someone digs up some entity that questions the metric used to calculate AGW, and then the deniers all stampede in to declare the entire sceintific community a hoax

try harder....

~S~


Just like your libtarded FAKE NEWS....

You lefties get caught FAKING data all the time...……

You are a SUCKER.....

You forgot FAKE VIEWS Deno>


denier-caucus-2016-tp-brandedv2-01.jpg

1*1vm8RW5sGpO5hI4fwAebaQ.jpeg


Views....News...

It's all fake with libtards……..
 
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.

A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.


While your analogy makes no sense,

It’s consistent with all your other retorts….
Lol, I think someone needs to look up the definition of "analogy".


That would be you Dip Shit.....
Doubling down on stupid is still stupid, stupid.

You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
Riiiight.
 
While your analogy makes no sense,

It’s consistent with all your other retorts….
Lol, I think someone needs to look up the definition of "analogy".


That would be you Dip Shit.....
Doubling down on stupid is still stupid, stupid.

You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
Riiiight.




I said-------The above comes from an expert on stupid...
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.

A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.


Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
 
Last edited:
Lol, I think someone needs to look up the definition of "analogy".


That would be you Dip Shit.....
Doubling down on stupid is still stupid, stupid.

You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
Riiiight.




I said-------
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.


A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.


Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
You have confused yourself.
 
That would be you Dip Shit.....
Doubling down on stupid is still stupid, stupid.

You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
Riiiight.




I said-------
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.


A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.


Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
You have confused yourself.


That was funny I have to admit...

Arguing with too many libtards at once…

Go back and read it now….
 
The water temperature in the arctic is always zero degrees C,
Ffs. It is not. Anyway

My guess is that the number of buoys in the Arctic Ocean that provide near-real-time temperature observations for e.g. numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are around 50.
How to Measure Temperature in the Arctic — the Lesser of Two Evils

Data from satellites is the primary source of information because the Arctic suffers from poor coverage in terms of the conventional observational network, which consists of drifting buoys and a number of land-based stations.
Sea Ice Temperature: Polar Portal
 
The water temperature in the arctic is always zero degrees C,
Ffs. It is not. Anyway

My guess is that the number of buoys in the Arctic Ocean that provide near-real-time temperature observations for e.g. numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are around 50.
How to Measure Temperature in the Arctic — the Lesser of Two Evils

Data from satellites is the primary source of information because the Arctic suffers from poor coverage in terms of the conventional observational network, which consists of drifting buoys and a number of land-based stations.
Sea Ice Temperature: Polar Portal
The buoys measure temperature, which is always the same, so of what use are they?

Aside from that, you said pretty much what I just posted. Satellite data shows that the Earth hasn't warmed in the last 10 years.
 
Consistent reducto absurdum .....someone digs up some entity that questions the metric used to calculate AGW, and then the deniers all stampede in to declare the entire sceintific community a hoax

try harder....

~S~


Just like your libtarded FAKE NEWS....

You lefties get caught FAKING data all the time...……

You are a SUCKER.....

You forgot FAKE VIEWS Deno>


denier-caucus-2016-tp-brandedv2-01.jpg

1*1vm8RW5sGpO5hI4fwAebaQ.jpeg
/——/ You’re an idiot.
 
Lol, I think someone needs to look up the definition of "analogy".


That would be you Dip Shit.....
Doubling down on stupid is still stupid, stupid.

You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
Riiiight.




I said-------The above comes from an expert on stupid...
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.
A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.



Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

I use analogies all the time in here to try and connect dots for the hopelessly duped in here.....sports team analogies.....boob augmentation analogies....

No dice....these folks just have zero ability to think on the margin.
Thomas Sowell, in his writings, was masterful at being able to bullseye the fuckedupedness in the thinking.
 
Again.....the fascinating thing here and total disconnect in the AGW community is this constant drum roll about "the decided science" being a given like it is some giant snowball rolling downhill that cant be stopped.....like skeptics are a horde of lepors on the landscape!!!

But if that were so, why has there been MASSIVE levels of apathy in the public about climate change action?

Well doy.....clearly "the science", while being acknowledged by the public, is not taken seriously. Sure folks may care about it......but not that much. Why? Because they've watched the scientists be wrong a billion times and have determined them to be a bit hysterical.

Climate crusaders dont understand that dynamic.....at all.:113:

Politically, people also know climate crusaders are progressives and know most grossly overstate EVERYTHING.....for them, they get hysterical about everything. Accordingly, non-hysterical people smell a rat. On climate change, if progressives tended to convey less head explosions on every issue, climate change action would be well under way. Instead.....stuck in the mud for 20 years.

DONT BE SO FUCKING HYSTERICAL!!!:hhello::hhello::hhello:
 
Last edited:
That would be you Dip Shit.....
Doubling down on stupid is still stupid, stupid.

You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
Riiiight.




I said-------The above comes from an expert on stupid...
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.
A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.



Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

I use analogies all the time in here to try and connect dots for the hopelessly duped in here.....sports team analogies.....boob augmentation analogies....

No dice....these folks just have zero ability to think on the margin.
Thomas Sowell, in his writings, was masterful at being able to bullseye the fuckedupedness in the thinking.
Maybe you do, but dino doesn't understand them.
 
This has been explained to you children over and over and over.

Stop practicing being stupid, you got it nailed.

Explained? Really? How about some observed, measured evidence to go along with those "explanations". How about a single piece of observed measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability....or a single piece of observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent link between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere....or better yet, how about a single published paper in which the hypothesized warming due to mankind's burning of hydrocarbon fuels, which is the foundation of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis has been empirically measured, quantified, and then attributed to so called green house gasses.

got any of those? Got an "explanation" for why not?
You are the among the worst of the folk I was talking about.

Still nothing but mewling logical fallacies... How does it feel to be holding a position that you can't even begin to defend..

That is how it goes when you have no informed opinion of your own. It doesn't pay to let someone with a political agenda give you one....I suppose it feels great till someone asks you to defend it...then there you are with nothing but logical fallacies...how sad.
You use a lotta big words that I doubt you really understand.

And you talk a lot of shit..but don't seem to be able to support your position at all...impotent name calling and one logical fallacy after another...got anything in defense of your position beyond the article which has no explanation for the observed evidence which contradicts it and NOAA's own statement that it is doubtful if the hypothesis holds water?
 
This has been explained to you children over and over and over.

Stop practicing being stupid, you got it nailed.

Explained? Really? How about some observed, measured evidence to go along with those "explanations". How about a single piece of observed measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability....or a single piece of observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent link between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere....or better yet, how about a single published paper in which the hypothesized warming due to mankind's burning of hydrocarbon fuels, which is the foundation of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis has been empirically measured, quantified, and then attributed to so called green house gasses.

got any of those? Got an "explanation" for why not?
You are the among the worst of the folk I was talking about.

Still nothing but mewling logical fallacies... How does it feel to be holding a position that you can't even begin to defend..

That is how it goes when you have no informed opinion of your own. It doesn't pay to let someone with a political agenda give you one....I suppose it feels great till someone asks you to defend it...then there you are with nothing but logical fallacies...how sad.
You use a lotta big words that I doubt you really understand.

And you talk a lot of shit..but don't seem to be able to support your position at all...impotent name calling and one logical fallacy after another...got anything in defense of your position beyond the article which has no explanation for the observed evidence which contradicts it and NOAA's own statement that it is doubtful if the hypothesis holds water?
Lol, almost every climate scientist, government, and University supports my statement. Who's backing you up, Alex Jones and some Russian hackers?
 
Doubling down on stupid is still stupid, stupid.

You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
Riiiight.




I said-------The above comes from an expert on stupid...
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.
A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.



Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

I use analogies all the time in here to try and connect dots for the hopelessly duped in here.....sports team analogies.....boob augmentation analogies....

No dice....these folks just have zero ability to think on the margin.
Thomas Sowell, in his writings, was masterful at being able to bullseye the fuckedupedness in the thinking.
Maybe you do, but dino doesn't understand them.


You are a lost ball in high weeds.....
 
You would think you would learn.....

The stupid is all yours Dip Shit......
Riiiight.




I said-------The above comes from an expert on stupid...
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.
A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.



Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

I use analogies all the time in here to try and connect dots for the hopelessly duped in here.....sports team analogies.....boob augmentation analogies....

No dice....these folks just have zero ability to think on the margin.
Thomas Sowell, in his writings, was masterful at being able to bullseye the fuckedupedness in the thinking.
Maybe you do, but dino doesn't understand them.


You are a lost ball in high weeds.....
That's nice kid, you shootin' for the Confucius thing now?

I don't think you can pull it off.
 
Riiiight.




I said-------The above comes from an expert on stupid...
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.
A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.



Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

I use analogies all the time in here to try and connect dots for the hopelessly duped in here.....sports team analogies.....boob augmentation analogies....

No dice....these folks just have zero ability to think on the margin.
Thomas Sowell, in his writings, was masterful at being able to bullseye the fuckedupedness in the thinking.
Maybe you do, but dino doesn't understand them.


You are a lost ball in high weeds.....
That's nice kid, you shootin' for the Confucius thing now?

I don't think you can pull it off.


You are pulling yourself off stupid…
 

I said-------The above comes from an expert on stupid...
He's been stupid his whole life....




You said-------
Lol, the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.
A classic, true, but mostly for gradeschoolers.



Hey stupid, you made a comparison, lame as it was…


a·nal·o·gy

[əˈnaləjē]

NOUN

1. a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

I use analogies all the time in here to try and connect dots for the hopelessly duped in here.....sports team analogies.....boob augmentation analogies....

No dice....these folks just have zero ability to think on the margin.
Thomas Sowell, in his writings, was masterful at being able to bullseye the fuckedupedness in the thinking.
Maybe you do, but dino doesn't understand them.


You are a lost ball in high weeds.....
That's nice kid, you shootin' for the Confucius thing now?

I don't think you can pull it off.


You are pulling yourself off stupid…
If you understood punctuation that actually wouldn't have been a bad come-back.

As it is, it's pretty much meaningless.
 

Forum List

Back
Top