CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,184
- 69,158
- 2,330
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
most definitely. If the dems wanna slaughter the gop, Liz warren is the ticket.Elizabeth Warren's name is being reported to be on Hillary's very short list for VP. I have mixed feelings about having two women at the top for the first time in U.S. history - until I ask myself the following question: Why not?
Elizabeth Warren is on Hillary Clinton's VP shortlist. Here are the pros and cons of that.
Were you a sexist when you voted Bush/Cheney?sexistNo. It's a stupid idea.
You have no credibility talking about liars, with your nominee.So you admit Warren is a filth mouth LIAR unworthy of being VP?
Of course, you haven't the first clue as to why you're supposed to hate Saul Alinsky. You were just told to, by your sheep-herders.
I believe Warren has the potential of becoming a great leader, maybe even president someday but this election is about winning the White House in November, not just picking great leaders. As long as Clinton has a comfortable margin in major polls and Trump remains unable to unify his party, there is no reason for Hillary to gamble. However, if Trump closes the gap between now and the democratic convention and pulls his party together, then Warren would make more sense because she would energize the more progress elements of the party.Yes she should pick Warren,no question.Elizabeth Warren's name is being reported to be on Hillary's very short list for VP. I have mixed feelings about having two women at the top for the first time in U.S. history - until I ask myself the following question: Why not?
Elizabeth Warren is on Hillary Clinton's VP shortlist. Here are the pros and cons of that.
I believe Warren has the potential of becoming a great leader, maybe even president someday but this election is about winning the White House in November, not just picking great leaders. As long as long as Clinton has a comfortable margin in major polls and Trump remains unable to unify his party, there is no reason for Hillary to gamble. However, if Trump closes the gap between now and democratic convention and pulls his party together, then Warren would make more sense because she would energize the more progress elements of the party.Yes she should pick Warren,no question.Elizabeth Warren's name is being reported to be on Hillary's very short list for VP. I have mixed feelings about having two women at the top for the first time in U.S. history - until I ask myself the following question: Why not?
Elizabeth Warren is on Hillary Clinton's VP shortlist. Here are the pros and cons of that.
Hillary could have stalin or mao as a running mate and still win.
leftist don't care about the country, they just want what they demand and they want it Constitution be damned.
hillary will never be made to answer real questions, the media will make useless topics the headlines and hillary will walk in, fuck shit up even more, be cheered for it and get re-elected.
They'll protest rich white privilege oligarchy....and then vote for the richest whites most establishment candidate in US historyNo...Warren being VP won't guarantee it.
What DOES guarantee it....is that a solid 40-50% of the general population are full blown retards who will vote Democrat no matter what. They'll protest rich white privilege oligarchy....and then vote for the richest whites most establishment candidate in US history.
That's insane. That's what the GOP does. Democrats are a coalition. Try to figure out why.
Standard leftist reply to anyone that doesn't immediately bow and support something a leftist woman says is to call the free thinker a sexist.Were you a sexist when you voted Bush/Cheney?sexistNo. It's a stupid idea.
hillary will win b/c she's a leftist twunt and the media will support her strictly based on her political party.Hillary could have stalin or mao as a running mate and still win.
leftist don't care about the country, they just want what they demand and they want it Constitution be damned.
hillary will never be made to answer real questions, the media will make useless topics the headlines and hillary will walk in, fuck shit up even more, be cheered for it and get re-elected.
Hillary will win because more Americans believe she is right for the country. Trump will lose because more Americans believe he is wrong for the country.
25 years of rightwing conspiracy theorieshillary will win b/c she's a leftist twunt and the media will support her strictly based on her political party.Hillary could have stalin or mao as a running mate and still win.
leftist don't care about the country, they just want what they demand and they want it Constitution be damned.
hillary will never be made to answer real questions, the media will make useless topics the headlines and hillary will walk in, fuck shit up even more, be cheered for it and get re-elected.
Hillary will win because more Americans believe she is right for the country. Trump will lose because more Americans believe he is wrong for the country.
she a complete failure at everything
fired for ethics
controversies follow her
lawsuits
deaths and murders
not even she can make a list of accomplishments.
If HIllary was smart he'd choose a hispanic male. Warren wouldn't get her anymore of the female vote and lose her a percent or two of the male vote. A sure loser.
Best of all she should choose Bernie = huge win.
Julian Castro is about as attractive a presidential candidate as Speedy Gonzales.
Bernie would not accept. Half his followers would bolt at the announcement. They don't like Hillary anymore than he does.
Will liar Warren guarantee the native American vote?
bernie?.....he would then become a big fucking hypocrite.....and a person with very little integrity...If HIllary was smart he'd choose a hispanic male. Warren wouldn't get her anymore of the female vote and lose her a percent or two of the male vote. A sure loser.
Best of all she should choose Bernie = huge win.