wow elijah cummings talk about caterwauling LOL

[Little-Acorn]

It is against the rules to keep a committee member from speaking in an investigation.


see how the right see rules?

they are only for the other party and the republicans can do ANYTHING

The Chair had already adjourned the hearing. ONLY THEN did the simian want to run his fat lying mouth. Too late.
The simian is only at the hearings to say anything he can to deflect any responsibility from Bobo. Everyone knows this.

The chair improperly attempted to close the hearing. Any and all members of the committee had the right and duty to challange the chair. In addition, it does does not go unnoticed that supporters of Issa are from a particularly low class segment of racist.

And now the leftist losers are making up new "rules" once they find they have to obey the same ones everyone else always has.

I haven't seen this kind of squalling and whining since the neighbor's baby got his bottom cleaned during a diaper change.

 

[mudwhistle]

Your party fucking cheats at EVERYTHING

You hate cheating, and that's the Dems favorite tactic, to cheat. They go around the rules, find excuses for their criminal behavior by claiming it has been done before. You're just too prejudiced to see the the truth.

bla bla bla go away troll the adults are talking

Blow me!@#$#@&@$##%&%%$32

 

[Truthmatters]

your mind has already blown a gasket.


you hate facts.

Its why I hate you

 

[Truthmatters]

The Chair had already adjourned the hearing. ONLY THEN did the simian want to run his fat lying mouth. Too late.
The simian is only at the hearings to say anything he can to deflect any responsibility from Bobo. Everyone knows this.

The chair improperly attempted to close the hearing. Any and all members of the committee had the right and duty to challange the chair. In addition, it does does not go unnoticed that supporters of Issa are from a particularly low class segment of racist.

And now the leftist losers are making up new "rules" once they find they have to obey the same ones everyone else always has.

I haven't seen this kind of squalling and whining since the neighbor's baby got his bottom cleaned during a diaper change.

PROVE your claim with documentation

 

[Wry Catcher]

Democrats are in full cover up mode. Lois Lerner should be arrested for contempt of congress.

Arrested for exercising her Rights under the Fifth Amendment? Are you daft?

 

[Wry Catcher]

It is against the rules to keep a committee member from speaking in an investigation.


see how the right see rules?

they are only for the other party and the republicans can do ANYTHING

The Chair had already adjourned the hearing. ONLY THEN did the simian want to run his fat lying mouth. Too late.
The simian is only at the hearings to say anything he can to deflect any responsibility from Bobo. Everyone knows this.

The chair improperly attempted to close the hearing. Any and all members of the committee had the right and duty to challange the chair. In addition, it does does not go unnoticed that supporters of Issa are from a particularly low class segment of racist.

SPOT ON! That "particularly low class segment of racist" is known as the ruck.

 

[mudwhistle]

Democrats are in full cover up mode. Lois Lerner should be arrested for contempt of congress.

Arrested for exercising her Rights under the Fifth Amendment? Are you daft?

They arrested Ollie North eventually.

They will arrest Lois Lerner.

 

[mudwhistle]

your mind has already blown a gasket.


you hate facts.

Its why I hate you

You don't even know me. Talk like a child, expect to be treated like one.

You wouldn't be able to spot a fact on a dare.

You're too biased.

 

[Iceweasel]

And now the leftist losers are making up new "rules" once they find they have to obey the same ones everyone else always has.

I haven't seen this kind of squalling and whining since the neighbor's baby got his bottom cleaned during a diaper change.

PROVE your claim with documentation

You want a photo of the baby's bottom?

 

[bedowin62]

It is against the rules to keep a committee member from speaking in an investigation.


see how the right see rules?

they are only for the other party and the republicans can do ANYTHING

The Chair had already adjourned the hearing. ONLY THEN did the simian want to run his fat lying mouth. Too late.
The simian is only at the hearings to say anything he can to deflect any responsibility from Bobo. Everyone knows this.

The chair improperly attempted to close the hearing. Any and all members of the committee had the right and duty to challange the chair. In addition, it does does not go unnoticed that supporters of Issa are from a particularly low class segment of racist.

oh; another left-wing loser using his lame race card


YAWN

 

[bedowin62]

INNOCENT people dont take the 5th; BECAUSE they have nothing to hide


idiots and hypocrites

 

[Little-Acorn]

your mind has already blown a gasket.


you hate facts.

Its why I hate you

The freedom to make remarks like this is one of the attractions of being a liberal.

Liberalism is a philosophy that feels that everyone else is incompetent and unable to survive without massive "help"... from liberals, inevitably. It couples that with a belief that their opponents are not just wrong, but unutterably evil. And to top it off, most Americans find their agenda unappealing, understandably. So the liberals have gotten into the habit of lying about their agenda, lying about their opponents, and twisting the truth wherever they can, since telling the truth would only get them voted out of power. Lying becomes a normal, ingrained habit with them.

So it tends to attract people who are slavering to denigrate and assassinate the character of conservatives, or even Republicans - ANYONE who opposes them, regardless of their actual characteristics. And saying "you hate facts" as little truthmutters frantically does here, is all in a day's work - just another part of what they must do to be successful liberals.

In a nutshell, liberalism attracts the worst among us. Some people who genuinely want to help others, don't last long in the liberal camp as they discover the platitudes of "helping the poor" etc. were fibs, and discover the true nature of the ones who have remained and risen through the ranks. The ones who remain, are the ones whom the agenda and tactics fit to a "T": Those seething with hate, people happy to lie and distort their way through life, etc.

Why else do they constantly spend their time spewing lies about conservatives such as "poisoning the air", "stealing from children", "dispossessing seniors", "throwing granny off the cliff", and now "your mind has blown a gasket"?

It's not a disturbing exception. Among liberals, it's the rule. It's the only way they can advance their agenda... and in most cases, the only way they want to.

And the dregs of humanity - warped individuals seething with hate, desiring to hurt and destroy others - find an accommodating home among their fellow travelers in the Democrat and other extreme-left big-government parties that regard the majority as needing help, unable to function well without "guidance", and generally inferior to the leftists. Not just now, but throughout history - England's "Labor" party, South Africa's white minority, Germany in the 1930s, etc.

 

[mudwhistle]

Here's hoping conservatives stop electing real live Criminals.

Oh yeah..that's not hyperbole either.

Issa's got a record.

Yeah, Obama has admitted to felonies, has no leadership capabilities or experience (OJT), and he's admittedly a bold-faced liar.

I prefer the guy with the record over the guy who has and continues to commit crimes but just hasn't faced justice as of yet.

Obama hasn't got a record.

Issa has.

Bush has.

And Obama didn't lie about anything.

The only President more honest than Barrack Obama was Jimmy Carter.

So you're saying Obama didn't say "if you like your doctor you can keep him"?

 

[mudwhistle]

tell us this video is lying.

the right has NO integrity left

Claiming you want to ask a question, and then reading a prepared statement is lying.

Do you follow?

Of course not. You consider the source, not the truth, when deciding who's lying.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Chair had already adjourned the hearing. ONLY THEN did the simian want to run his fat lying mouth. Too late.
The simian is only at the hearings to say anything he can to deflect any responsibility from Bobo. Everyone knows this.

The chair improperly attempted to close the hearing. Any and all members of the committee had the right and duty to challange the chair. In addition, it does does not go unnoticed that supporters of Issa are from a particularly low class segment of racist.

oh; another left-wing loser using his lame race card


YAWN

The chair controls the meeting, not the members.

Issa closed the meeting and Cummings wanted to ask a procedural question after adjournment. He was out of order if he wanted to read a prepared statement disparaging the committee.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The Chair had already adjourned the hearing. ONLY THEN did the simian want to run his fat lying mouth. Too late.
The simian is only at the hearings to say anything he can to deflect any responsibility from Bobo. Everyone knows this.

The chair improperly attempted to close the hearing. Any and all members of the committee had the right and duty to challange the chair. In addition, it does does not go unnoticed that supporters of Issa are from a particularly low class segment of racist.

oh; another left-wing loser using his lame race card


YAWN

On some level you must know you're stupid. Sad, I pity you.

 

[bedowin62]

The chair improperly attempted to close the hearing. Any and all members of the committee had the right and duty to challange the chair. In addition, it does does not go unnoticed that supporters of Issa are from a particularly low class segment of racist.

oh; another left-wing loser using his lame race card


YAWN

On some level you must know you're stupid. Sad, I pity you.

On some level you must know i couldnt care less what you think of me. i pity you.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The chair improperly attempted to close the hearing. Any and all members of the committee had the right and duty to challange the chair. In addition, it does does not go unnoticed that supporters of Issa are from a particularly low class segment of racist.

oh; another left-wing loser using his lame race card


YAWN

The chair controls the meeting, not the members.

Issa closed the meeting and Cummings wanted to ask a procedural question after adjournment. He was out of order if he wanted to read a prepared statement disparaging the committee.

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest" ^^^ notwithstanding evidence to the contrary.

Parliamentary procedure - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For Fair and Orderly Meetings & Conventions

Provides common rules and procedures for deliberation and debate in order to place the whole membership on the same footing and speaking the same language. The conduct of ALL business is controlled by the general will of the whole membership - the right of the deliberate majority to decide. Complementary is the right of at least a strong minority to require the majority to be deliberate - to act according to its considered judgment AFTER a full and fair "working through" of the issues involved. Robert's Rules provides for constructive and democratic meetings, to help, not hinder, the business of the assembly. Under no circumstances should "undue strictness" be allowed to intimidate members or limit full participation.

Robert's Rules Of Order | Quick Reference

 

[bedowin62]

oh; another left-wing loser using his lame race card


YAWN

The chair controls the meeting, not the members.

Issa closed the meeting and Cummings wanted to ask a procedural question after adjournment. He was out of order if he wanted to read a prepared statement disparaging the committee.

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest" ^^^ notwithstanding evidence to the contrary.

Parliamentary procedure - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For Fair and Orderly Meetings & Conventions

Provides common rules and procedures for deliberation and debate in order to place the whole membership on the same footing and speaking the same language. The conduct of ALL business is controlled by the general will of the whole membership - the right of the deliberate majority to decide. Complementary is the right of at least a strong minority to require the majority to be deliberate - to act according to its considered judgment AFTER a full and fair "working through" of the issues involved. Robert's Rules provides for constructive and democratic meetings, to help, not hinder, the business of the assembly. Under no circumstances should "undue strictness" be allowed to intimidate members or limit full participation.

Robert's Rules Of Order | Quick Reference

the citation above makes the case for the other side. i think the one hearing (or reading) what he wants to believe is you.

lol

 

[Wry Catcher]

The chair controls the meeting, not the members.

Issa closed the meeting and Cummings wanted to ask a procedural question after adjournment. He was out of order if he wanted to read a prepared statement disparaging the committee.

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest" ^^^ notwithstanding evidence to the contrary.

Parliamentary procedure - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For Fair and Orderly Meetings & Conventions

Provides common rules and procedures for deliberation and debate in order to place the whole membership on the same footing and speaking the same language. The conduct of ALL business is controlled by the general will of the whole membership - the right of the deliberate majority to decide. Complementary is the right of at least a strong minority to require the majority to be deliberate - to act according to its considered judgment AFTER a full and fair "working through" of the issues involved. Robert's Rules provides for constructive and democratic meetings, to help, not hinder, the business of the assembly. Under no circumstances should "undue strictness" be allowed to intimidate members or limit full participation.

Robert's Rules Of Order | Quick Reference

the citation above makes the case for the other side. i think the one hearing (or reading) what he wants to believe is you.

lol

Now you don't, you can't - think that is. You've proved that in the short time you've posted and in this post again.