asterism
Congress != Progress
The topic of this thread is a poll. The topic of this thread depends on the value of polling to make an argument. The consensus on the Right at USMB is that the 90+% in the polls for universal background checks was of NO value as an argument.
All I'm asking is, why is this different? ...why is this different other than the obvious reason that it's different because it's a poll you people like?
Show the consensus. Plenty of people on the right did not argue with the basis of the other polls.
Since this thread is about this poll, do you think it's meaningless?
Ok, just to shut you up, I have said about a thousand times on this forum that I consider polls, especially averages of multiple polls, to be reasonably accurate snapshots of public opinion at that time,
assuming the poll does not have some demonstrable flaw in methodology.
You know, Eric Holder would appoint the special prosecutor. What do you think then happens if that appointment does not cause enough high-up Democratic heads to roll?
...the rightwing propaganda machine that is in full cry for that appointment would then write him or her off as just some handpicked lackey of the administration who was in on the whole scheme,
and away we'd go again.
You don't think this is a scandal do you?