WSJ: Special Counsel Mueller impanels Grand Jury in Russia Investigation.

Yes, Mueller has done. I am not making too much of it. Grand juries are as often as not used to subpoena information as anything else. I will make something of the grand jury handing down an indictment, or several of them.
But you cannot even form a GRAND JURY without THE INDICTING STATEMENT, CITATION OF US CODE SUPPORTING IT, and NAMING THE CRIME(S).

The GRAND JURY THEN FINDS THE INDICTMENT TRUE or NOT TRUE


The mode of accusation is by a written statement in solemn form (indictment) describing the offense with proper accompaniments of time and circumstances, and certainty of act and person or by a mode less formal, which is usually the spontaneous act of the grand jury, called presentment. [5] No indictment or presentment can be made except by concurrence of at least twelve of the jurors. The grand jury may accuse upon their own knowledge, but it is generally done upon the testimony of witnesses under oath and other evidence heard before them. The proceedings of grand jury are, in the first instance, at the instigation of the government or other prosecutor, and ex parte and in secret deliberation. The accused has no knowledge nor right to interfere with their proceedings. [6]

If they find the accusation true, which is usually drawn up in form by the prosecutor or an officer of the court, they write upon the indictment the words "a true bill" which is signed by the foreman of the grand jury and presented to the court publicly in the presence of all the jurors. If the indictment is not proven to the satisfaction of the grand jury, the word "ignoramus" or "not a true bill" is written upon it by the grand jury, or by their foreman and then said to be ignored, and the accusation is dismissed as unfounded. If the grand jury returns an indictment as a true bill ("billa vera"), the indictment is said to be founded and party stand indicted, and required to be put upon trial. [7]
Grand jury - Wikipedia
^ This idiot here thinks there has already been an indictment.

:lol:
And here's a clue-by-four: I'm pretty damn sure Mueller knows what potential crimes have been committed, and the US Codes associated with it.
 
We're indicting Jr for meeting a lawyer in the first degree, er, or something. Uninformed sources told CNN, it could be true this time.

No, really

It could be!
 
Among the crimes are bribery, subornation of perjury, criminal obstruction of justice, money laundering, tax evasion, witness tampering, and violations of election laws including campaign finance laws. Other crimes that occurred in the Russia affair are violations of the foreign agent registration laws and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, perjury itself (including lying to federal investigators), plus espionage and even treason. Also emoluments violations.
 
Whats the FBI Hotline for meeting lawyers?
1-800-breathless?
better-call-saul-saul-goodman-esq-800x600.jpg
 
Among the crimes are bribery, subornation of perjury, criminal obstruction of justice, money laundering, tax evasion, witness tampering, and violations of election laws including campaign finance laws. Other crimes that occurred in the Russia affair are violations of the foreign agent registration laws and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, perjury itself (including lying to federal investigators), plus espionage and even treason. Also emoluments violations.
:lol:
 
Crusader Rabbit actually thinks that Trump jr, Kushner and Manafort met with Russians to talk about adoption.
Since when does anyone in the trump administration care about children?

Example: let Obamacare implode !!!!!
Leaving millions without the treatment people need for their families.

Adoption ! lol
Crusader Rabbit is a trump whore like no other.
 
Crusader Rabbit actually thinks that Trump jr, Kushner and Manafort met with Russians to talk about adoption.
Since when does anyone in the trump administration care about children?

Example: let Obamacare implode !!!!!
Leaving millions without the treatment people need for their families.

Adoption ! lol
Crusader Rabbit is a trump whore like no other.
Irrespective of what was discussed...even if they talked about Hildebeast's emails screwing others... what do you think the crime was in Trump Jr. meeting with the Russian?
 
LOL what a JOKE MUELLER and his group of NAZI thugs are.

He cannot even LEGALLY IMPANEL a GRAND JURY without citing The Potential Crime committed, and US CODE VIOLATED.


"The mode of accusation is by a written statement in solemn form (indictment) describing the offense with proper accompaniments of time and circumstances, and certainty of act and person or by a mode less formal, which is usually the spontaneous act of the grand jury, called presentment. [5] No indictment or presentment can be made except by concurrence of at least twelve of the jurors. The grand jury may accuse upon their own knowledge, but it is generally done upon the testimony of witnesses under oath and other evidence heard before them. The proceedings of grand jury are, in the first instance, at the instigation of the government or other prosecutor, and ex parte and in secret deliberation. The accused has no knowledge nor right to interfere with their proceedings. [6]"

Grand jury - Wikipedia

Where is THE INDICTMENT, and the US CODE citation to justify the impaneling of a GRAND JURY?

Really? Whatever do you mean? He's got his approval to go ahead.



btw....

Grand Jury Proceedings

Grand jury proceedings are much more relaxed than normal court room proceedings. There is no judge present and frequently there are no lawyers except for the prosecutor. The prosecutor will explain the law to the jury and work with them to gather evidence and hear testimony. Under normal courtroom rules of evidence, exhibits and other testimony must adhere to strict rules before admission. However, a grand jury has broad power to see and hear almost anything they would like.

However, unlike the vast majority of trials, grand jury proceedings are kept in strict confidence. This serves two purposes:

  1. It encourages witnesses to speak freely and without fear of retaliation.
  2. It protects the potential defendant's reputation in case the jury does not decide to indict.
And

  1. Federal Rules of Criminal ProcedureTITLE III. THE GRAND JURY, THE INDICTMENT, AND THE INFORMATION › Rule 6. The Grand Jury
Rule 6. The Grand Jury
(a) Summoning a Grand Jury.

(1) In General. When the public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be summoned. A grand jury must have 16 to 23 members, and the court must order that enough legally qualified persons be summoned to meet this requirement.

(2) Alternate Jurors. When a grand jury is selected, the court may also select alternate jurors. Alternate jurors must have the same qualifications and be selected in the same manner as any other juror. Alternate jurors replace jurors in the same sequence in which the alternates were selected. An alternate juror who replaces a juror is subject to the same challenges, takes the same oath, and has the same authority as the other jurors
Rule 6. The Grand Jury

:disbelief:What were you saying?
 
Yes, Mueller has done. I am not making too much of it. Grand juries are as often as not used to subpoena information as anything else. I will make something of the grand jury handing down an indictment, or several of them.
But you cannot even form a GRAND JURY without THE INDICTING STATEMENT, CITATION OF US CODE SUPPORTING IT, and NAMING THE CRIME(S).

The GRAND JURY THEN FINDS THE INDICTMENT TRUE or NOT TRUE


The mode of accusation is by a written statement in solemn form (indictment) describing the offense with proper accompaniments of time and circumstances, and certainty of act and person or by a mode less formal, which is usually the spontaneous act of the grand jury, called presentment. [5] No indictment or presentment can be made except by concurrence of at least twelve of the jurors. The grand jury may accuse upon their own knowledge, but it is generally done upon the testimony of witnesses under oath and other evidence heard before them. The proceedings of grand jury are, in the first instance, at the instigation of the government or other prosecutor, and ex parte and in secret deliberation. The accused has no knowledge nor right to interfere with their proceedings. [6]

If they find the accusation true, which is usually drawn up in form by the prosecutor or an officer of the court, they write upon the indictment the words "a true bill" which is signed by the foreman of the grand jury and presented to the court publicly in the presence of all the jurors. If the indictment is not proven to the satisfaction of the grand jury, the word "ignoramus" or "not a true bill" is written upon it by the grand jury, or by their foreman and then said to be ignored, and the accusation is dismissed as unfounded. If the grand jury returns an indictment as a true bill ("billa vera"), the indictment is said to be founded and party stand indicted, and required to be put upon trial. [7]
Grand jury - Wikipedia
^ This idiot here thinks there has already been an indictment.

:lol:
And here's a clue-by-four: I'm pretty damn sure Mueller knows what potential crimes have been committed, and the US Codes associated with it.

I DID NOT SAY INDICTMENT DICK BREATH.

MUELLER HAS TO PUBLISH THE "INDICTING STATEMENT" CITING US CODE(S) POTENTIALLY VIOLATED, THE CRIME(S) NAMED, THE ACCUSED NAMED, AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ALLEGED CRIME(S), TIME(S) PLACE(S) ETC.

IT BECOMES AN INDICTMENT AFTER THE GRAND JURY DECLARES IT TRUE OR NOT TRUE WHICH MEANS IT NEVER BECOMES AN INDICTMENT IF DECLARED INVALID.
BTW declaring an potential INDICTMENT "invalid" is where we get the word IGNORAMUS from.

BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON WERE NEVER INDICTED, BUT THEY WERE ACCUSED OF CRIMES WHICH IS WHY THEY HAD TO FACE A GRAND JURY. THERE WAS US CODE CITED, CRIMES NAMED ETC.

ARE YOU FUCKING LEFTIST SO STUPID AND SO USED TO BEING LIED TO THAT YOU DON'T KNOW HOW A GRAND JURY WORKS?

THE GRAND JURY'S JOB ISN'T TO UNCOVER CRIMES AND LIST THEM!

THEIR JOB IS TO AGREE OR DISAGREE WHETHER OR NOT THE CRIMES LISTED BY THE PROSECUTOR ARE VALID TO GO FORWARD WITH AN INDICTMENT OR INVALID AND DISMISSED.

THE CRIMES AND US CODE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS ARE "PRESENTED" TO THE GRAND JURY AND ARE USED BEFORE THE GRAND JURY IS FORMED TO JUSTIFY CALLING TO IMPANEL A GRAND JURY.

WITHOUT MUELLER PRESENTED HIS LIST OF CRIME(S) ALLEGEDLY COMMITTED, US CODE(S) VIOLATED, AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDED THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS, HE CANNOT EVEN CALL FOR A GRAND JURY TO BE IMPANELED.

YOU DON'T IMPANEL A GRAND JURY AND THEN GO ON A FISHING EXPEDITION LOOKING FOR A CRIME, THE CRIME HAS TO BE NAMED, WITH SUPPORTING US CODE VIOLATION ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN VIOLATED.

AGAIN, WHAT WAS THE CRIME MUELLER IS STATING IN HIS INDICTING STATEMENT TO JUSTIFY THE FORMATION OF A GRAND JURY?

CITE SUPPORTING US CODE TO JUSTIFY IT.
 
Last edited:
He has been dirty all his life... from his early days of being under federal investigation for legal fraud, to screwing the little guy and walking away after his terms with millions , to defrauding many with his bogus Senate term.....
so you really really think he's changed his ways?

We'll see who has the last laugh..

Yes, Obama was bad news.......we all agree.

Right! They all heard you.

But really. They're all watching/monitoring the Orange Douche.

giphy.gif
 
Ouchie ouchie pie pie.

Reuters Top News‏Verified account @Reuters
BREAKING: Grand jury subpoenas have been issued related to June 2016 meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Russian lawyers and others
What do you think the crime was in Trump Jr. meeting with Russian lawyers and others?

I really want to know what everyone thinks the crime was. Not for lack of asking several times, let''s see if you will answer.
 
It will be nice when we can move on, my bet, it will turn out that Russia did meddle with our election, and maybe Trump had some shady dealings but no intent to harm America. or the grand jury will decide that nothing at all needs to come out.
 
AGAIN PEOPLE....you have to NAME THE CRIME and CITE US CODE TO JUSTIFY IMPANELING A GRAND JURY.

MUELLER CANNOT CALL A GRAND JURY!

IT'S ILLEGAL IF HE CANNOT "PRESENT " THE CRIME TO A GRAND JURY TO EVEN JUSTIFY IMPANELING ONE!

Just like what was done in White Water.....and People went to Prison for That.

Convictions[edit]
The Clintons were never charged with any crime. Fifteen other persons were convicted of more than 40 crimes, including Jim Guy Tucker, who was removed from office.[44]

  • Jim Guy Tucker: Governor of Arkansas at the time, removed from office (fraud, 3 counts)
  • William J. Marks, Sr.: Jim Guy Tucker's business partner (conspiracy)
  • Jim McDougal: banker, Clinton political supporter: (18 felonies, varied)
  • David Hale: banker, self-proclaimed Clinton political supporter: (conspiracy, fraud)
  • Neal Ainley: Perry County Bank president (embezzled bank funds for Clinton campaign)
  • Larry Kuca: Madison real estate agent (multiple loan fraud)
  • Charles Matthews: Whitewater defendant (bribery)
 
Yes, Mueller has done. I am not making too much of it. Grand juries are as often as not used to subpoena information as anything else. I will make something of the grand jury handing down an indictment, or several of them.
But you cannot even form a GRAND JURY without THE INDICTING STATEMENT, CITATION OF US CODE SUPPORTING IT, and NAMING THE CRIME(S).

The GRAND JURY THEN FINDS THE INDICTMENT TRUE or NOT TRUE


The mode of accusation is by a written statement in solemn form (indictment) describing the offense with proper accompaniments of time and circumstances, and certainty of act and person or by a mode less formal, which is usually the spontaneous act of the grand jury, called presentment. [5] No indictment or presentment can be made except by concurrence of at least twelve of the jurors. The grand jury may accuse upon their own knowledge, but it is generally done upon the testimony of witnesses under oath and other evidence heard before them. The proceedings of grand jury are, in the first instance, at the instigation of the government or other prosecutor, and ex parte and in secret deliberation. The accused has no knowledge nor right to interfere with their proceedings. [6]

If they find the accusation true, which is usually drawn up in form by the prosecutor or an officer of the court, they write upon the indictment the words "a true bill" which is signed by the foreman of the grand jury and presented to the court publicly in the presence of all the jurors. If the indictment is not proven to the satisfaction of the grand jury, the word "ignoramus" or "not a true bill" is written upon it by the grand jury, or by their foreman and then said to be ignored, and the accusation is dismissed as unfounded. If the grand jury returns an indictment as a true bill ("billa vera"), the indictment is said to be founded and party stand indicted, and required to be put upon trial. [7]
Grand jury - Wikipedia
^ This idiot here thinks there has already been an indictment.

:lol:
And here's a clue-by-four: I'm pretty damn sure Mueller knows what potential crimes have been committed, and the US Codes associated with it.

I DID NOT SAY INDICTMENT DICK BREATH.

MUELLER HAS TO PUBLISH THE INDICTING STATEMENT CITING US CODE(S) POTENTIALLY VIOLATED, THE CRIME NAMED, THE ACCUSED NAMED, AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ALLEGED CRIME, TIME PLACE ETC.

IT BECOMES AN INDICTMENT AFTER THE GRAND JURY DECLARES IT TRUE OR NOT TRUE WHICH MEANS IT NEVER BECOMES AN INDICTMENT IF DECLARED INVALID.

BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON WERE NEVER INDICTED, BUT THEY WERE ACCUSED OF CRIMES WHICH IS WHY THEY HAD TO FACE A GRAND JURY. THERE WAS US CODE CITED, CRIMES NAMED ETC.

ARE YOU FUCKING LEFTIST SO STUPID AND SO USED TO BEING LIED TO THAT YOU DON'T KNOW HOW A GRAND JURY WORKS?

THEIR JOB ISN'T TO UNCOVER CRIMES AND LIST THEM. THEIR JOB IS TO AGREE OR DISAGREE WHETHER OR NOT THE CRIMES LISTED BY THE PROSECUTOR ARE VALID TO GO FORWARD WITH AN INDICTMENT OR INVALID AND DISMISSED.

THE CRIMES AND US CODE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS ARE PRESENTED TO THE GRAND JURY AND ARE USED BEFORE THE GRAND JURY IS FORMED TO JUSTIFY CALLING FOR THE IMPALEMENT OF THE GRAND JURY.

WITHOUT MUELLER PRESENTED HIS LIST OF CRIME(S) ALLEGEDLY COMMITTED, US CODE(S) VIOLATED, AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDED THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS, HE CANNOT EVEN CALL FOR A GRAND JURY TO BE IMPANELED.

YOU DON'T IMPANEL A GRAND JURY AND THEN GO ON A FISHING EXPEDITION LOOKING FOR A CRIME, THE CRIME HAS TO BE NAMED, WITH SUPPORTING US CODE VIOLATION ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN VIOLATED.

AGAIN, WHAT WAS THE CRIME MUELLER IS STATING IN HIS INDICTING STATEMENT TO JUSTIFY THE FORMATION OF A GRAND JURY?

CITE SUPPORTING US CODE TO JUSTIFY IT.
Hooly shit. You are in severe need of a straight jacket. Off.
the.
fucking.
rails.
 

Forum List

Back
Top