Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Read what I wrote. I did NOT ask you why you think she SHOULD be fired. I pointed out that you changed your reasons why she should be fired.
At first you thought she should be fired because she would be in the locker room/showers and her orientation would make that unacceptable.
When you found out that that was not true and that she was only seen kissing her partner in a car, THAT became the reason you thought she should be fired.
Yes on the first reason and yes on the second. I do not believe that anyone "openly gay" (openly displaying deviant sex behaviors) should be an adult role model at a school. And there is no provision in the US Constitution protecting deviant sex addicts from that enforcement. That's what Hively v Ivy tech said, in essence.