hipeter924
Not a zombie yet
- May 5, 2009
- 6,092
- 621
Well, once Iraq was destabilized the US couldn't leave. The Iraqi failure to defend Mosul, and the cut and run proved how weak and ineffective they really were against determined terrorist groups. Ultimately though, if the argument was 'we shouldn't be there', then we should have left in 2009.Obama increased the debt over 10 trillion dollars!! Iraq was won and over. We should have kept a residual force there and an airbase. Obama picked up and pulled out for no good reason, but to satisfy his leftist base. Now we have isis and Iran taking over what an idiot he isNever said that. But it should would help to knock out debt, and boost funding to NATO. Neither of which America is able to do now, as according to the deficit forecasts the deficit will increase significantly in 2016.Yeah i think we should just eliminate the defense budget all together. Give the money to NATO and pay off college loansYep. We spent trillions in Iraq and Afghanistan.That is money that could have been spent on:You wait for your enemies to get stronger you spend moreAnd all of it, 100%, is America's fault right? How many dead troops, how many trillions of dollars spent, would satisfy you over our involvement in the middle east clusterfuck? It hearkens back to Vietnam. There were politicians then who would have us at war with Vietnam to this day. And yet the world didn't end.
1) Education (could pay off all student debt with a few trillion)
2) Healthcare (we could fix multiple holes with a few trillion)
3) Paying off debt (a few trillion less debt wouldn't hurt)
4) NATO (having money to support Ukraine now would have been nice)
5) Funding anti-terror efforts globally (rather than just in two countries)
The goal of Al Qaeda and other terror groups was to wear down America, as they did the Soviet Union.
Have to say unfortunately that they succeeded, thanks to a bit of naivety and American arrogance.
So much for learning from history.![]()