You are unemployed and want a new job, under a Democratic president you have a better chance of getting one!

[Luckyone]

Well, at least you admitted you are biased.

I admit I am biased against immorality, lack of ethics, lack of principles, and inhumanity.

Guilty as charged.

 

[Lastamender]

???? You are now going off the deep end

First of all, I don't have a political bias. I am against Trump because he (as a person) has no morals, ethics, principles, or humanity, and I am against Trumpers because they support HIM. It is not about Republicans or their ideals. It is about knowing that such a person will do much more damage than anything good for anyone, not even his own followers.

As far as you statement about past performance. Humans by nature, tend to do the same thing over and over again in their lives (few ever change) and therefore "past performance" shows what the probabilities are of how they will act in the future. Since there are no certainties in life (other than death), going with the probabilities makes common sense.

You said peers. Want to change that?

 

[Lastamender]

I admit I am biased against immorality, lack of ethics, lack of principles, and inhumanity.

Guilty as charged.

If you are a Democrat you live for those things.

 

[Luckyone]

You said peers. Want to change that

The first thing you should do is research the definition of peers, when it comes to the legal system (the courts)

Here is definition (just in case you are too lazy to go to Google).

Generally, a jury of one's peers is a random selection of other citizens from a similar geographic location. These individuals do not necessarily share traits similar to a defendant's.

If peers meant other rich people, there is no way that any of them would have found him guilty, given that they all probably would do the same criminality themselves.

 

[Concerned American]

The first thing you should do is research the definition of peers, when it comes to the legal system (the courts)

Here is definition (just in case you are too lazy to go to Google).

Generally, a jury of one's peers is a random selection of other citizens from a similar geographic location. These individuals do not necessarily share traits similar to a defendant's.

If peers meant other rich people, there is no way that any of them would have found him guilty, given that they all probably would do the same criminality themselves.

How about returning to the topic, moron. You seem to have a limited attention span and an even shorter memory when it comes to what you post. LOL

 

[Luckyone]

If you are a Democrat you live for those things.

You are now being biased. You are judging people for their beliefs and not by who they are as people. That is the same things as Christians hating Jews, heterosexuals hating homosexuals, Whites hating Blacks, simply because of their religion, their sexual preferences and their color.

You are now showing who you are.

 

[Concerned American]

You are now being biased. You are judging people for their beliefs and not by who they are as people. That is the same things as Christians hating Jews, heterosexuals hating homosexuals, Whites hating Blacks, simply because of their religion, their sexual preferences and their color.

You are now showing who you are.

You are projecting and making insinuations that are based on your own lies. Might I remind you that the KKK is a democrat organization. Hmmm. What does that say about you.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

The OP is not about Clinton. It is about employment being better under Democrats than under Republicans for the past 44 years. Clinton is not anything being discussed here. He is simply the messenger of the information that is statistical.

You should change your handle to Lyingone. Post 21 points out why, and every word of it checks out. Yet you still haven't quit with your BS.

You're intellectually dishonest for starts. Oh boy, Biden took over after COVID, opened the gates despite more COVID cases and deaths, what a fucking champion. Govt. don't create jobs short those to build govt. operations. Private is far more competent, less dangerous too, the govt. has stepped up their game cornering resources and control of you beginning with Obama. We're supposed to ignore the GDP increased 33% Trump's last qtr., before he was replaced by Xiden. And unemployment was reduced to 6.7% December 2020. You know, the year Democrats demanded the country be shut down?

And oh boy, Obama delivered us from the housing crash. Never mind the Demonicrats controlled congress by a LOT when the housing crashed, and the depths were reached under Obama and democracked control of both legislatures. Obama's overhaul of healthcare interfered with private recovery, while they dumped an astounding budget toward creating govt. That's one reason the recovery took so long.

And don't look now, but the unemployment rate is higher today than Trump's before covid hit, which you dishonestly blame Trump for. Matter of fact, California leads the pack in unemployment, which is the Democrack's pride and joy State. So joyous they turned the place to shit, leading to an exodus, and the replacements are foreigners. Yet still, negative population growth, the place sucks, theft a way of life, for instance. That's Kamala's legacy, and if you like California, please do support Kamala, that way California holds the govts. biggest arm, and it's bigly.

 

[Lastamender]

The first thing you should do is research the definition of peers, when it comes to the legal system (the courts)

Here is definition (just in case you are too lazy to go to Google).

Generally, a jury of one's peers is a random selection of other citizens from a similar geographic location. These individuals do not necessarily share traits similar to a defendant's.

If peers meant other rich people, there is no way that any of them would have found him guilty, given that they all probably would do the same criminality themselves.

I would love to see the bump in their bank accounts after the guilty verdict. How about you shill?

 

[Lastamender]

You are now being biased. You are judging people for their beliefs and not by who they are as people. That is the same things as Christians hating Jews, heterosexuals hating homosexuals, Whites hating Blacks, simply because of their religion, their sexual preferences and their color.

You are now showing who you are.

A lot of those things have to do with sin. You people conveniently forget that. You are the biased ones.

 

[j-mac]

Bill Clinton stated this evening that since 1989, 51 million new jobs have been created and under the Democrats, of those 51, 49 million were created under Democratic presidents and only 2 million were created under Republican presidents.

Clinton said he had to check it 3 times but that it was confirmed.

Here is a link to one of the articles that confirms that information:

“Since 1989 and a new age of globalization began, 51 million jobs have been created in America. 49 million, 96%, have been created under Democratic presidents.”

This means that more Americans were working under Democratic rule than under Republican presidents. More people working means a better economy, better lives, and better life for all.

This is also something that is true and that has been confirmed 100%

View attachment 999299

Two threads, two utter fails … Good job hack…

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Luckyone]

Two threads, two utter fails … Good job hack…

Thanks for chiming in with your opinion

 

[Luckyone]

A lot of those things have to do with sin. You people conveniently forget that. You are the biased ones.

Make your point about sin! Is being Black a sin? is being a Jew a sin? Is being homosexual a sin?

 

[Luckyone]

I would love to see the bump in their bank accounts after the guilty verdict. How about you shill?

Prove it. Speculation is BS.

By the way, 6 of the peers were chosen by the defense and if anyone has a reputation for trying to buy votes, it is Trump. With just one juror not agreeing with the guilty verdict, Trump would not be a convicted felon. You mean to say that Trump would not try to do that, if he could?

 

[Lastamender]

Make your point about sin! Is being Black a sin? is being a Jew a sin? Is being homosexual a sin?

Being a homosexual is a sin in every religion that I know of. Your other crap is a joke.

 

[Lastamender]

Prove it. Speculation is BS.

By the way, 6 of the peers were chosen by the defense and if anyone has a reputation for trying to buy votes, it is Trump. With just one juror not agreeing with the guilty verdict, Trump would not be a convicted felon. You mean to say that Trump would not try to do that, if he could?

Oh I see Trump cancelled the student loans. You are really full of shit.

 

[Concerned American]

Make your point about sin! Is being Black a sin? is being a Jew a sin? Is being homosexual a sin?

No, moron, being a racist democrat that projects their own beliefs on others is though. Democrats founded the KKK.

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Luckyone]

You should change your handle to Lyingone. Post 21 points out why, and every word of it checks out. Yet you still haven't quit with your BS.

You're intellectually dishonest for starts. Oh boy, Biden took over after COVID, opened the gates despite more COVID cases and deaths, what a fucking champion. Govt. don't create jobs short those to build govt. operations. Private is far more competent, less dangerous too, the govt. has stepped up their game cornering resources and control of you beginning with Obama. We're supposed to ignore the GDP increased 33% Trump's last qtr., before he was replaced by Xiden. And unemployment was reduced to 6.7% December 2020. You know, the year Democrats demanded the country be shut down?

And oh boy, Obama delivered us from the housing crash. Never mind the Demonicrats controlled congress by a LOT when the housing crashed, and the depths were reached under Obama and democracked control of both legislatures. Obama's overhaul of healthcare interfered with private recovery, while they dumped an astounding budget toward creating govt. That's one reason the recovery took so long.

And don't look now, but the unemployment rate is higher today than Trump's before covid hit, which you dishonestly blame Trump for. Matter of fact, California leads the pack in unemployment, which is the Democrack's pride and joy State. So joyous they turned the place to shit, leading to an exodus, and the replacements are foreigners. Yet still, negative population growth, the place sucks, theft a way of life, for instance. That's Kamala's legacy, and if you like California, please do support Kamala, that way Cornia holds the govts. biggest arm, and it's bigly.

You are being blind-by-choice

The OP gave you statistics going back 44 years an another poster added the following numbers from the Bureau of Statistics

Jobs:

Bush41 ... +2½ million
Clinton ..... +23 million
Bush43 .... +1½ million
Obama .. +11½ million
Trump ...... -2½ million
Biden .... +15½ million

Republicans ... 1½ million
Democrats ...... 50 million

Unemployment rate:

Bush41 .... +1.9
Clinton ...... -3.1
Bush43 .... +3.6
Obama ...... -3.1
Trump .......+1.7
Biden ......... -2.1

Republicans ... +7.2
Democrats ...... -8.3

and you avoid the numbers and put your opinion as being the true picture and then insult the messenger? In what fantasy land do you live in?

This one?