Aries
Gold Member
- Apr 4, 2017
- 3,520
- 348
Many footstamp recipients have jobs. It's not that they have no income, it's that their income isn't enough to make ends meet.When did you poll them? Never that's when. You just make up shit to promote your lies.Fuck entitled pampered Democrat athletes. They live in the greatest country on this earth. Stand for the damn anthem!
The majority of the people of the Greatest Nation on Earth disagree with you.All this Republican failure is putting my job in overdrive.You've been posting about Obama's balls a lot today... have you been fantasizing?
I must admit I find Obama extremely attractive myself, I don't blame you.
That you NL constantly talk about fantasies, it tells me you're the ones that do such things.
How's that worthless government job going?
Once we get dems back in ill be able to kick my feet up a bit. Unemployment always drops under dems.
Seems food stamp use went to record highs under Obama. You work in a government job, You kick you feet up and draw a check regardless.
Food stamps use went up with unemployment from Great Recession and has been going down since economy got back on track.
Yes, crazy correlations, I know.
You mean the unemployment Obama himself said wouldn't go above 8% yet went above 10%?
When Bush left office in January, 2009 unemployment , depending on the source ranged from 7.6% to 7.8%. The numbers using food stamps was approximately 32 million. Both can be verified if you choose not to agree. When Obama left office in January 2017, claimed unemployment was 4.8% and had supposedly been coming down for several years. In February, 2013, unemployment under Obama was at the same point as when Bush left office 4 years before. However, food stamp use was still hovering around the record numbers.
Why had food stamp use not dropped to the same levels as under Bush if unemployment was at the same percentage? After claims that unemployment dropped approximately 3% lower 4 years later under Obama (January, 2017), why had food stamp use not dropped below the 32 million high under Bush?
That's why food stamp stats don't directly correlate to employment rates.