Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This change was sparked by the shooting in Florida, and the videos recently being removed are ones suggesting that the survivors are taking orders from the left and that the shooting the staged. Specifically the ones suggesting it was staged are questioning the government.Having nothing to do with your ability to question the government.My argument is not, and never has been, that they aren't allowed to do this. YouTube is privately owned, thus they are perfectly free to chase away their own users.YouTube is a private organization. They can do as they like. Just like Infowars is allowed to spread their looney conspiracy theories. YouTube is allowed to block hoaxes that promote negativity.
I hope you didn't work too hard building up that strawman.
You consequently have no argument.
Beats having the NRA being the LARGEST constant visitor.The Left hates ALL of the Bill of RightsIt is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.
Only when those Rights make THEM uncomfortable. They're "opportunists" when it comes to Freedom and Liberty. Not to be trusted DETERMINING what is fake or offensive. Especially NOT the most powerful content company in the world..
Use Bing. It's improved. Don't use Chrome or buy Android tablets. Hit back...
Cute tangent, but this isn't about "the left". It's apparently about YouTube's TOS and the amazing revelation that, per thread title "we can't criticize the government" on it. Which immediately means a whole lot of stuff I and countless others have watched on YouTube musta been halluciminations.
Of COURSE --- it's about the left. Google was by FAR the LARGEST constant visitor presence at the WH during the Obama Admin. They are Silicon Valley speech suppressing leftists.
Google workers met had 427 meetings at White House over Obama presidency | Daily Mail Online
Google Makes Most of Close Ties to White House
One of the worst browsers next to MSN....Did you guys end your Firefox boycott?Never heard of it, but "googled" it. I tried to find it for my Android phone. Firefox seems to have their own phone version. I will switch from Chrome to one of them.I just use Epic Privacy Browser's built-in search engine at this point. Google's search is less reliable, anyway, and I don't want to support them... it's just a drop in the bucket, though.YouTube IS Google.
No, this is how conservatives exhibit their ignorance and stupidity."So this is how the Republic dies....at the sound of thunderous applause".
The Left hates ALL of the Bill of RightsIt is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.
Only when those Rights make THEM uncomfortable. They're "opportunists" when it comes to Freedom and Liberty. Not to be trusted DETERMINING what is fake or offensive. Especially NOT the most powerful content company in the world..
Use Bing. It's improved. Don't use Chrome or buy Android tablets. Hit back...
Cute tangent, but this isn't about "the left". It's apparently about YouTube's TOS and the amazing revelation that, per thread title "we can't criticize the government" on it. Which immediately means a whole lot of stuff I and countless others have watched on YouTube musta been halluciminations.
Of COURSE --- it's about the left. Google was by FAR the LARGEST constant visitor presence at the WH during the Obama Admin. They are Silicon Valley speech suppressing leftists.
Google workers met had 427 meetings at White House over Obama presidency | Daily Mail Online
Google Makes Most of Close Ties to White House
That doesn't make Google "the left". It makes a good Association Fallacy. And again, this thread is (apparently) simply about YouTube's terms of service --- which is not even related to politics.
Youtube's Terms of Service have been changed so that nobody can discuss anything that they have decided is a "Hoax". Youtube is getting more and more strict with people it doesn't agree with.
It was also due to a YouTube star that made a video by a guy that committed suicide..This change was sparked by the shooting in Florida, and the videos recently being removed are ones suggesting that the survivors are taking orders from the left and that the shooting the staged. Specifically the ones suggesting it was staged are questioning the government.Having nothing to do with your ability to question the government.My argument is not, and never has been, that they aren't allowed to do this. YouTube is privately owned, thus they are perfectly free to chase away their own users.YouTube is a private organization. They can do as they like. Just like Infowars is allowed to spread their looney conspiracy theories. YouTube is allowed to block hoaxes that promote negativity.
I hope you didn't work too hard building up that strawman.
You consequently have no argument.
You stating I don't have an argument doesn't mean I don't have one. You only wish I didn't.
Youtube's Terms of Service have been changed so that nobody can discuss anything that they have decided is a "Hoax". Youtube is getting more and more strict with people it doesn't agree with.
Youtube is a private business- they can censor anything that they want.
If you don't agree with their terms and conditions- start your own website.
I never said they couldn't. In fact, I already said something similar 2-3 times in this very thread. The point of this thread is to announce the change and spark discussion regarding it, not for me to argue that they can't or shouldn't be allowed to censor people.
Youtube's Terms of Service have been changed so that nobody can discuss anything that they have decided is a "Hoax". Youtube is getting more and more strict with people it doesn't agree with.
No, it’s getting more difficult for conspiracy theory liars to post their lies and distortions on YouTube.
High time that those engaging in political discussion got called for their lies.
How much commission are you making?Yahoo search for images and memes suck though...The Left hates ALL of the Bill of RightsIt is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.
Only when those Rights make THEM uncomfortable. They're "opportunists" when it comes to Freedom and Liberty. Not to be trusted DETERMINING what is fake or offensive. Especially NOT the most powerful content company in the world..
Use Bing. It's improved. Don't use Chrome or buy Android tablets. Hit back...
Bing used to suck.. But in the past 2 years, it's GREATLY improved. INCLUDING image/meme searches. And WITHOUT the feeling that every returned search is being pushed on you because of your browsing history..
The Left hates ALL of the Bill of RightsIt is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.
Only when those Rights make THEM uncomfortable. They're "opportunists" when it comes to Freedom and Liberty. Not to be trusted DETERMINING what is fake or offensive. Especially NOT the most powerful content company in the world..
Use Bing. It's improved. Don't use Chrome or buy Android tablets. Hit back...
Cute tangent, but this isn't about "the left". It's apparently about YouTube's TOS and the amazing revelation that, per thread title "we can't criticize the government" on it. Which immediately means a whole lot of stuff I and countless others have watched on YouTube musta been halluciminations.
Of COURSE --- it's about the left. Google was by FAR the LARGEST constant visitor presence at the WH during the Obama Admin. They are Silicon Valley speech suppressing leftists.
Google workers met had 427 meetings at White House over Obama presidency | Daily Mail Online
Google Makes Most of Close Ties to White House
Tie THAT to Obama rant this week trying to revive interest in media "fairness" and hitting on the VERY FEW "non-leftist dominated" sources of news and opinion.. What do lobbyists do??? They LOBBY to HURT their competition.. They USE the power of govt to gain ADVANTAGE over their competitors...
THAT'S the 430 visits to the WH. Didn't even have to go thru Congress or the minions of morons in the Agencies. RIGHT ---- to the top....
I'll miss your big mouth...The Left hates ALL of the Bill of Rights
Only when those Rights make THEM uncomfortable. They're "opportunists" when it comes to Freedom and Liberty. Not to be trusted DETERMINING what is fake or offensive. Especially NOT the most powerful content company in the world..
Use Bing. It's improved. Don't use Chrome or buy Android tablets. Hit back...
Cute tangent, but this isn't about "the left". It's apparently about YouTube's TOS and the amazing revelation that, per thread title "we can't criticize the government" on it. Which immediately means a whole lot of stuff I and countless others have watched on YouTube musta been halluciminations.
Of COURSE --- it's about the left. Google was by FAR the LARGEST constant visitor presence at the WH during the Obama Admin. They are Silicon Valley speech suppressing leftists.
Google workers met had 427 meetings at White House over Obama presidency | Daily Mail Online
Google Makes Most of Close Ties to White House
That doesn't make Google "the left". It makes a good Association Fallacy. And again, this thread is (apparently) simply about YouTube's terms of service --- which is not even related to politics.
Of COURSE --- it's about politics. Because the material being CUT is stuff that makes the LEFT uncomfortable.
Go find me GAY activists or Trump critics that are complaining about Google censorship.. If you DO --- I'll STFU..
YouTube is a private organization. They can do as they like. Just like Infowars is allowed to spread their looney conspiracy theories. YouTube is allowed to block hoaxes that promote negativity.
I'm getting to the point that I just want to drop out completely...How much commission are you making?Yahoo search for images and memes suck though...The Left hates ALL of the Bill of Rights
Only when those Rights make THEM uncomfortable. They're "opportunists" when it comes to Freedom and Liberty. Not to be trusted DETERMINING what is fake or offensive. Especially NOT the most powerful content company in the world..
Use Bing. It's improved. Don't use Chrome or buy Android tablets. Hit back...
Bing used to suck.. But in the past 2 years, it's GREATLY improved. INCLUDING image/meme searches. And WITHOUT the feeling that every returned search is being pushed on you because of your browsing history..
Never thought I'd be hawking Microsoft. But it's like the duopoly sucky choices you get on a Dem/Rep controlled ballot.. It's like folks who have given up on political principles and integrity and just "hold their nose and vote for tthe lessor evil"...
Youtube's Terms of Service have been changed so that nobody can discuss anything that they have decided is a "Hoax". Youtube is getting more and more strict with people it doesn't agree with.
It is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.
aaaaaand enter the fake news-pologists. No doubt dizzy from all the 180s they have to spin depending on whose fake news it is. Fake news bad. No, fake news good. No, fake news bad. Etc etc ad nauseum and having it both ways: Priceless.
Your lack of self-awareness makes this post actually funny.
I never said Fake News was good or bad. I think anyone should be able to publish any story they like. It's up to the people to actually verify the claims... or in your case instantly believe every story that fits their narrative. Of course, YouTube is privately owned, and if they want to lose users, it's entirely up to them. It'll only damage their reputation further.
Obviously, since you've taken great leaps to connect said fake news with "if they want to lose users" and "damage their reputation" you DO think it's bad. You just articulated your own value judgment --- did you really think that wasn't obvious? And not to even mention your title that imagines a world where "we can't criticize the government". With no justification whatsoever.
Youtube's Terms of Service have been changed so that nobody can discuss anything that they have decided is a "Hoax". Youtube is getting more and more strict with people it doesn't agree with.
It is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.
aaaaaand enter the fake news-pologists. No doubt dizzy from all the 180s they have to spin depending on whose fake news it is. Fake news bad. No, fake news good. No, fake news bad. Etc etc ad nauseum and having it both ways: Priceless.
Your lack of self-awareness makes this post actually funny.
I never said Fake News was good or bad. I think anyone should be able to publish any story they like. It's up to the people to actually verify the claims... or in your case instantly believe every story that fits their narrative. Of course, YouTube is privately owned, and if they want to lose users, it's entirely up to them. It'll only damage their reputation further.
Obviously, since you've taken great leaps to connect said fake news with "if they want to lose users" and "damage their reputation" you DO think it's bad. You just articulated your own value judgment --- did you really think that wasn't obvious? And not to even mention your title that imagines a world where "we can't criticize the government". With no justification whatsoever.
It's not a giant leap. Naturally, if they are censoring people, those they censor and those that want to see the censored content will have a lower opinion of the platform and those censoring the platform, and would likely go elsewhere. In other words, their reputation would be damaged among those people, and they'd be losing those viewers.
It's completely justified. The videos being censored are discussing the Florida shooting, suggesting that the survivors are being led by the leftists on their crusade to disarm America, and some of those in the government may have staged the shooting. Most of the channels getting strikes and being banned are Anarcho-Capitalist channels, which question the government with nearly every video they make.
As if on cue: an example of rightwing stupidity.Is Youtube a government agency?The Left hates ALL of the Bill of RightsIt is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.
Should they be censoring free speech in favor of the left? They are, what's your doublewide opinion of that?
Absolutely they are free to do so as a private entity.
However, should they be allowed to put cookies into everybody's browser?
Yahoo doesn't have that power.
Youtube's Terms of Service have been changed so that nobody can discuss anything that they have decided is a "Hoax". Youtube is getting more and more strict with people it doesn't agree with.
No, it’s getting more difficult for conspiracy theory liars to post their lies and distortions on YouTube.
High time that those engaging in political discussion got called for their lies.
Youtube's Terms of Service have been changed so that nobody can discuss anything that they have decided is a "Hoax". Youtube is getting more and more strict with people it doesn't agree with.
It is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.
aaaaaand enter the fake news-pologists. No doubt dizzy from all the 180s they have to spin depending on whose fake news it is. Fake news bad. No, fake news good. No, fake news bad. Etc etc ad nauseum and having it both ways: Priceless.
Your lack of self-awareness makes this post actually funny.
I never said Fake News was good or bad. I think anyone should be able to publish any story they like. It's up to the people to actually verify the claims... or in your case instantly believe every story that fits their narrative. Of course, YouTube is privately owned, and if they want to lose users, it's entirely up to them. It'll only damage their reputation further.
Obviously, since you've taken great leaps to connect said fake news with "if they want to lose users" and "damage their reputation" you DO think it's bad. You just articulated your own value judgment --- did you really think that wasn't obvious? And not to even mention your title that imagines a world where "we can't criticize the government". With no justification whatsoever.
It's not a giant leap. Naturally, if they are censoring people, those they censor and those that want to see the censored content will have a lower opinion of the platform and those censoring the platform, and would likely go elsewhere. In other words, their reputation would be damaged among those people, and they'd be losing those viewers.
It's completely justified. The videos being censored are discussing the Florida shooting, suggesting that the survivors are being led by the leftists on their crusade to disarm America, and some of those in the government may have staged the shooting. Most of the channels getting strikes and being banned are Anarcho-Capitalist channels, which question the government with nearly every video they make.
Ah, so this is about all the wacknuts who want to dehumanize school shooting victims -- and their grieving parents --- by calling them "actors" ---- is it?
As I said at the beginning..... fake news good when it goes your way, fake news bad when it doesn't. Having it both ways: Priceless.
Know what I call said dehumanizing wacknuts? Exactly what they are --- TRAITORS.
