Youtube goes on a Censorship/demonitizing spree against Conservatives to defend Dylan Mulvaney

[Curried Goats]

Because even parents don't have the right to mutilate a child.

I'm not really moved by you calling it mutilation anymore than I would be by you calling chemo therapy a poisioning. Sometimes kids need chemo.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I'll pass. I seem to do fine without looking to YouTube to lead me. Did you happen to answer as to who I vote for?

No
You never answered why you disagreed that children shouldn't receive "transition care" that causes permanent change to their bodies.

 

[pknopp]

No
You never answered why you disagreed that children shouldn't receive "transition care" that causes permanent change to their bodies.

I never said any opinion on that. I am not qualified to.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I never said any opinion on that. I am not qualified to.

Posting a disagree icon is an opinion.
And if you are not qualified, that means you are mentally handicapped. Are you?
You don't seem to be a person with debilitating low IQ.
But I know the virtue signaling route you are trying to attempt. Which is like saying you aren't qualified to say being morbidly obese is bad for you or not.

 

[pknopp]

Posting a disagree icon is an opinion.

Most of the time I do that when one posts something not worth replying to or that I have addressed many times.

And if you are not qualified, that means you are mentally handicapped. Are you?

I am not qualified in addressing the proper treatment for one with cancer either. Does that also make me mentally handicapped?

You don't seem to be a person with debilitating low IQ.
But I know the virtue signaling route you are trying to attempt. Which is like saying you aren't qualified to say being morbidly obese is bad for you or not.

No, we know it can be. That's pretty basic. I am not qualified in diagnosing a problem a morbidly obese person has though.

 

[hadit]

I think people seeking whatever medical avenues or affirmations works for them is a good thing. How about you?

As long as we acknowledge that children are not the most reliable sources for choosing medical avenues and affirmations that are the best for them long-term, and that non-permanent solutions are generally the best so they can be undone if necessary without undue harm.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

Another win for the good guys.

Riiight cause silencing opinions you don't agree with means you're the "good guys"

 

[Curried Goats]

As long as we acknowledge that children are not the most reliable sources for choosing medical avenues and affirmations that are the best for them long-term, and that non-permanent solutions are generally the best so they can be undone if necessary without undue harm.

Are you their doctor? How about we let patients and their doctors figure out what the best avenue of treatment for them are.

 

[badger2]

I'm not really moved by you calling it mutilation anymore than I would be by you calling chemo therapy a poisioning. Sometimes kids need chemo.

Dipshit, opposite-sex hormones can be considered a poison depending on a particular genome, and increase the risk of thoracic cancers. Circumcision is not the same mutilation type as those found in crotch-clownism. Circumcision is a reaction to potential disease before Theo confiscates the procedure. Islamic clitorectomies differ as well from circumcision, because the psychopathology is both mentally and physically violent. Just because the preacher feels threatened by a clitoris that may grow to exceed average penis size doesn't mean that Church and State should copulate.

The instant the tranny-wannabe mutilates itself is the same instant that biological fate will have been betrayed, setting the stage for mentally ill sequelae. This is not salvation for the illusions in its head. The mutilated tranny will always thereafter not be able to change the fact that it betrayed, that it did a low-quality Judas imitation.

 

[mak2]

As long as we acknowledge that children are not the most reliable sources for choosing medical avenues and affirmations that are the best for them long-term, and that non-permanent solutions are generally the best so they can be undone if necessary without undue harm.

I think I would rather believe medical science instead of conservobot doctrine on any medical avenues risk benefit ratio. I just dont think far right nutters should be making those kind of decisions.

 

[badger2]

Genomic Russian roulette. Leaving any original tissue behind during the surgery, the "new" tranny risks complications such as thoracic cancers.

 

[Curried Goats]

Dipshit, opposite-sex hormones can be considered a poison depending on a particular genome, and increase the risk of thoracic cancers. Circumcision is not the same mutilation type as those found in crotch-clownism. Circumcision is a reaction to potential disease before Theo confiscates the procedure. Islamic clitorectomies differ as well from circumcision, because the psychopathology is both mentally and physically violent. Just because the preacher feels threatened by a clitoris that may grow to exceed average penis size doesn't mean that Church and State should copulate.

The instant the tranny-wannabe mutilates itself is the same instant that biological fate will have been betrayed, setting the stage for mentally ill sequelae. This is not salvation for the illusions in its head. The mutilated tranny will always thereafter not be able to change the fact that it betrayed, that it did a low-quality Judas imitation.

Dipshit your body regardless of sex, produces both testosterone and estrogen, just in different amounts. Learn boilogy you Bingo.

 

[Lastamender]

Let me know when they waste 3 years of their lives screaming voter fraud--as you have done with your "life"

That is not an answer. Do you have one?

 

[Mac-7]

Why is it important that they do? Seriously. If some random person I don't know referred to me with female pronouns I'm not sure I could care less. If someone I did know did it I wouldn't give a shit. If you need someone else to validate your sex or gender, maybe you aren't actually sure you are the sex/gender you say you are. Doubly if that validation has to come from some random guy on the YouTubes.

If a man is born with a penis he will always be a male

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I am not qualified in addressing the proper treatment for one with cancer either. Does that also make me mentally handicapped?

Yeah because treating cancer and lopping off a young girls breasts, chemically castrating young boys is the exact same moral dilemma.
Can you seriously take any dumber position than this?
I had you wrong, never really engaged with you before that I can remember.
But I thought you were reasonable and reasonably intelligent. I still believe the latter, but certainly not the former.
You are the quintessential, weak minded person who has an unnatural need to always be right. And if being wrong is considered right - man, you are all in.

Goodbye - it is a waste of reason to talk to the unreasonable.

 

[pknopp]

Yeah because treating cancer and lopping off a young girls breasts, chemically castrating young boys is the exact same moral dilemma.
Can you seriously take any dumber position than this?
I had you wrong, never really engaged with you before that I can remember.
But I thought you were reasonable and reasonably intelligent. I still believe the latter, but certainly not the former.
You are the quintessential, weak minded person who has an unnatural need to always be right. And if being wrong is considered right - man, you are all in.

Goodbye - it is a waste of reason to talk to the unreasonable.

I don't pretend to be an internet expert unlike you. If you consider that ignorant, so be it.

 

[Wapasha]

Multiple civil conservative commentators had their youtube content censored or demonitized for vague breeches of policy on videos about Trans "woman" Dylan Mulvaney.

The leading victim is Matt Walsh, who clearly isn't giving in to the gigantic corporate oppressor that is Youtube:

“If I simply respect the preferred pronouns and stop accurately gendering people, then I can likely continue to do my show on the platform, get it remonetized after a short probationary period, and continue making over $100,000 a month on YouTube ads,” Walsh said. "In other words, all I have to do to keep the money and the platform is give up my integrity and my soul,” he added. “And to that I say: hell no. No way.”

Other victims include Michael Knowles, Brett Cooper, Tim Pool, and many others.

These are the good guys in the story, fighting against gov't croney capitalism to not be suppressed by the state. The bad guys are not only the totalitarian big tech corporations who are going out of their way to attack their clients for their political views in the name of supporting the political party they support and at times take orders from, but also the political party that desires this sort of malicious treatment against people who civally disagree with them.. the Democrats.

You'd think the spirit of journalism would call most of the MSM to come to the aid of these victims.. but of course, they are nearly all in lock-step with these big tech/Democrat malicious actions.

Crazy times. So sad to see so many neutered journalists in the MSM.

Maybe Anheuser-Busch used their mega corporate clout as a big advertisement buyer, to coerce YouTube into taking action, because all of these anti Bud Light videos are damaging to the Anheuser-Busch brand?

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Another win for the good guys.

^^^ supports drag shows for children and censorship of those who don't.

Democrats are America's enemy.

MTG IS RIGHT!!!

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Maybe Anheuser-Busch used their mega corporate clout as a big advertisement buyer, to coerce YouTube into taking action, because all of these anti Bud Light videos are damaging to the Anheuser-Busch brand?

Doubtful.. this is probably more political activism to attack those with the wrong opinions and muffle them to shift the Overton window

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Yeah because treating cancer and lopping off a young girls breasts, chemically castrating young boys is the exact same moral dilemma.
Can you seriously take any dumber position than this?
I had you wrong, never really engaged with you before that I can remember.
But I thought you were reasonable and reasonably intelligent. I still believe the latter, but certainly not the former.
You are the quintessential, weak minded person who has an unnatural need to always be right. And if being wrong is considered right - man, you are all in.

Goodbye - it is a waste of reason to talk to the unreasonable.

Why bother? I’ve had them on ignore for a long time. Do yourself a favor..