🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

YUGE WINNING! E.P.A. Officials, Disheartened by Agency’s Direction, Are Leaving in Droves!!!

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
53,493
54,250
3,615
THIS IS SUCH GOOD NEWS!!! THE EPA WAS BLOATED AND GETTING AWAY FROM THEIR CORE RESPONSIBILITIES.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!!!


WASHINGTON — More than 700 people have left the Environmental Protection Agency since President Trump took office, a wave of departures that puts the administration nearly a quarter of the way toward its goal of shrinking the agency to levels last seen during the Reagan administration.

Of the employees who have quit, retired or taken a buyout package since the beginning of the year, more than 200 are scientists. An additional 96 are environmental protection specialists, a broad category that includes scientists as well as others experienced in investigating and analyzing pollution levels. Nine department directors have departed the agency as well as dozens of attorneys and program managers. Most of the employees who have left are not being replaced.

E.P.A. Officials, Disheartened by Agency’s Direction, Are Leaving in Droves
 
I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.
 
I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?
 
The EPA is a cesspool for corrupt left wingnuts. Enviro-wacko groups use the EPA to stop people and businesses from building and doing projects.
 
THIS IS SUCH GOOD NEWS!!! THE EPA WAS BLOATED AND GETTING AWAY FROM THEIR CORE RESPONSIBILITIES.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!!!


WASHINGTON — More than 700 people have left the Environmental Protection Agency since President Trump took office, a wave of departures that puts the administration nearly a quarter of the way toward its goal of shrinking the agency to levels last seen during the Reagan administration.

Of the employees who have quit, retired or taken a buyout package since the beginning of the year, more than 200 are scientists. An additional 96 are environmental protection specialists, a broad category that includes scientists as well as others experienced in investigating and analyzing pollution levels. Nine department directors have departed the agency as well as dozens of attorneys and program managers. Most of the employees who have left are not being replaced.

E.P.A. Officials, Disheartened by Agency’s Direction, Are Leaving in Droves

more good news
 
THIS IS SUCH GOOD NEWS!!! THE EPA WAS BLOATED AND GETTING AWAY FROM THEIR CORE RESPONSIBILITIES.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!!!


WASHINGTON — More than 700 people have left the Environmental Protection Agency since President Trump took office, a wave of departures that puts the administration nearly a quarter of the way toward its goal of shrinking the agency to levels last seen during the Reagan administration.

Of the employees who have quit, retired or taken a buyout package since the beginning of the year, more than 200 are scientists. An additional 96 are environmental protection specialists, a broad category that includes scientists as well as others experienced in investigating and analyzing pollution levels. Nine department directors have departed the agency as well as dozens of attorneys and program managers. Most of the employees who have left are not being replaced.


E.P.A. Officials, Disheartened by Agency’s Direction, Are Leaving in Droves
/----/ That means the enviro Wackos will have to find real jobs. Maybe stocking the shelves at Walmart.
 
THIS IS SUCH GOOD NEWS!!! THE EPA WAS BLOATED AND GETTING AWAY FROM THEIR CORE RESPONSIBILITIES.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!!!


WASHINGTON — More than 700 people have left the Environmental Protection Agency since President Trump took office, a wave of departures that puts the administration nearly a quarter of the way toward its goal of shrinking the agency to levels last seen during the Reagan administration.

Of the employees who have quit, retired or taken a buyout package since the beginning of the year, more than 200 are scientists. An additional 96 are environmental protection specialists, a broad category that includes scientists as well as others experienced in investigating and analyzing pollution levels. Nine department directors have departed the agency as well as dozens of attorneys and program managers. Most of the employees who have left are not being replaced.


E.P.A. Officials, Disheartened by Agency’s Direction, Are Leaving in Droves
/----/ That means the enviro Wackos will have to find real jobs. Maybe stocking the shelves at Walmart.


yes

but there is a long way to go

the BLM needs a good cleaning out as well
 
I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .
 
I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .

the problem is it has become filled with leftists and has lost it purpose

but then again anything leftards touch goes to shit
 
I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .

the problem is it has become filled with leftists and has lost it purpose

but then again anything leftards touch goes to shit

Hmmm. Let’s be honest . The right hates the Epa because they stand in the way of big biz who have and would again physically destroy our country to gain an extra dollar .
 
I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .

the problem is it has become filled with leftists and has lost it purpose

but then again anything leftards touch goes to shit

Hmmm. Let’s be honest . The right hates the Epa because they stand in the way of big biz who have and would again physically destroy our country to gain an extra dollar .


that is honest ya shit for brains
 
I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .

the problem is it has become filled with leftists and has lost it purpose

but then again anything leftards touch goes to shit

Hmmm. Let’s be honest . The right hates the Epa because they stand in the way of big biz who have and would again physically destroy our country to gain an extra dollar .


that is honest ya shit for brains

That’s for admitting that you treasonous righty scum care more for business than your own country.
 
They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .

the problem is it has become filled with leftists and has lost it purpose

but then again anything leftards touch goes to shit

Hmmm. Let’s be honest . The right hates the Epa because they stand in the way of big biz who have and would again physically destroy our country to gain an extra dollar .


that is honest ya shit for brains

That’s for admitting that you treasonous righty scum care more for business than your own country.


once again timmy proves not only is he a retard but a liar as well
 
THIS IS SUCH GOOD NEWS!!! THE EPA WAS BLOATED AND GETTING AWAY FROM THEIR CORE RESPONSIBILITIES.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!!!


WASHINGTON — More than 700 people have left the Environmental Protection Agency since President Trump took office, a wave of departures that puts the administration nearly a quarter of the way toward its goal of shrinking the agency to levels last seen during the Reagan administration.

Of the employees who have quit, retired or taken a buyout package since the beginning of the year, more than 200 are scientists. An additional 96 are environmental protection specialists, a broad category that includes scientists as well as others experienced in investigating and analyzing pollution levels. Nine department directors have departed the agency as well as dozens of attorneys and program managers. Most of the employees who have left are not being replaced.

E.P.A. Officials, Disheartened by Agency’s Direction, Are Leaving in Droves

I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.

I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .
 
The EPA Annual budget is $533,000 PER EMPLOYEE.

:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:

I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .

the problem is it has become filled with leftists and has lost it purpose

but then again anything leftards touch goes to shit

Hmmm. Let’s be honest . The right hates the Epa because they stand in the way of big biz who have and would again physically destroy our country to gain an extra dollar .


that is honest ya shit for brains

They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?

The epa is one of our most successful agencies . Look what they have accomplished in just a 40 year span.

That budget is because they subcontract clean ups all over the place .

the problem is it has become filled with leftists and has lost it purpose

but then again anything leftards touch goes to shit

Hmmm. Let’s be honest . The right hates the Epa because they stand in the way of big biz who have and would again physically destroy our country to gain an extra dollar .


that is honest ya shit for brains

That’s for admitting that you treasonous righty scum care more for business than your own country.

Let me try this again---->

Timmy The Tool is trying to reach status of the number 1 phony-baloney on this site!

So Mr Tool, tell us what the EPA does!

Say what you say, they protect all things leftist, lol.

Really?

Let me remind everyone how the EPA protects you! EPA: Pollution from mine spill much worse than feared
 
With only 700 out of 15,000 exiting, seems they have a loooonnnngggg way to go.
I favor a constitutional amendment authorizing the Fed govt to run an Environmental Protection Agency. Currently the only authorization they have for that, is to run an agency that manages pollution etc. that crosses state lines or otherwise affects interstate commerce. The have NO authority to tell you not to drain a swamp on your property (unless your property straddles a state border, pretty rare), or to tell Los Angeles not to pollute its air unless they can prove the pollution is drifting 300 miles into Nevada and Arizona.

Note that the present EPA is doing all those things anyway, hugely.

The purpose of the Constitutional amendment, is to restrict the EPA to only things that cross state borders. Presently there are some problems with one state being polluted by its neighbors, where the state getting the pollution can do nothing about it. That is a proper function of the Federal government, and one that George Washington never worried about, he had weightier matters on his mind.

The amendment should also list penalties to be imposed on those who violate it.

With such a constitutional amendment in place, the EPA can be reined in, and restricted to only things that cannot be handled by the states themselves.


They were WAAAY out of control.

15,000 employees and an $8 billion budget?

...and the EPA was founded by Nixon. Nixon was a bad person. Therefore the EPA is bad.

Isn't that PROG LOGIC?
 

Forum List

Back
Top