- Thread starter
- #21
One fellow had a gun, and had been told by the police to back off.
Wrong. When he asked of they wanted him to follow Martin he was told by non-emergency dispatcher "we don't need you to do that." The police didn't tell him jack squat.
The other fellow was a 17 kid being followed at night by a man he did not know. What was said between them, we have only Zimmermann's word for, because the kid is dead.
He was a 17 year old thug, and he was in a place he shouldn't have been in. I've been followed by lots of people I didn't know. I didn't break their nose or smash their skulls against the pavement. Being followed is not an excuse to assault someone.
The arguments of the Zimmerman lynch mob couldn't be more pathetic.
If I am being flowered by a thug looking CAC, I want to know why and if I don't get the right answer I go into attack and survival mode, ASAP. I sure as hell would not lead him to my home. Trayvon had every right to be where he was. Zimmerman should have stayed in his car after call 911. Zimmerman reached in his pocket for a phone? How did Trayvon know he was reaching for a phone or a gun and he punched him which exactly what I would have done.
As far as Trayvon reaching for his gun? Lie are there would have been a struggle over the gun. Trayvon never saw the gun.
And we all know how much credibility Zimmerman's word hold.
Last edited: