Little-Acorn
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2006
- 10,025
- 2,410
- Thread starter
- #61
Too bad you weren't there to tell the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the U.S. Department of State that their estimates were completely wrong.And yet, invading Japan was not necessary, so no Marines or Army personnel would have gotten any splinters from bamboo.
![rolleyes :rolleyes-41: :rolleyes-41:](/styles/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Back to the subject:
Military planners estimated that the coming invasion of Japan in 1945-1946 would cost a quarter million Allied lives, plus several million Japanese military and civilian lives.
Instead, the atomic bomb destroyed almost no Allied lives and less than half a million Japanese lives from all causes. Horrific, but far less than the invasion would have taken.
Japanese officials were offering only a stand-down that would leave the pro-war Japanese government intact and in charge - a situation the U.S. rejected for obvious reasons.
BTW, though the two bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the only two we had on hand at that moment, the U.S. was in gear to produce half a dozen more within a few months, and more later as needed. These would have been used on Japan during the invasion if Japan didn't surrender. Fortunately for all involved, the Japanese realized that the U.S. could completely destroy Japan as a country with virtually no U.S. casualties, with the remains divided between America and Russia (who was also invading), and so saw the wisdom of surrendering.