🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

1,600-plus Scientists Say Climate "Emergency" Is a Myth

A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they “strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being pushed across the globe. The declaration does not deny the harmful effect of greenhouse gasses, but instead challenges the hysteria brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.

justthenews.com

More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate 'emergency' a myth

The global coalition of scientists say that politics and a journalistic frenzy has propelled a doomsday climate change hysteria. The signatories also ask other scientists to "address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming."
justthenews.com
justthenews.com
What goes around comes around. The Klimate Kult set the bar on what’s required and it’s come around. Good and harder.
Karma.

You stupid MAGAt Troll. One sees these bogus petitions all the time.​

I could get more than this from Liberty University disagreeing with Evolution.



Fact check: Did 1,200 climate experts sign 'declaration' denying climate emergency?​


16/09/2022 -

A document claiming that 'there is no climate emergency' has been circulating on social media.

A climate-denying document, supposedly signed by 1,200 leading scientists and academics, has gone viral on social media.
The "World Climate Declaration" -- which claims that there is "no climate emergency" -- was first shared on 27 June. One Australian Senator shared the document on Facebook claiming that "this is further confirmation that there is no climate emergency".

Other well-known Conspiracy groups have argued that there is no scientific consensus that humans are to blame for global warming because the “Earth's climate has varied since the planet first existed, with naturally occurring cold and warm phases".

A 2021 report by Cornell University found that 99.9% of more than 88,000 climate change studies agree that humans have accelerated the phenomenon, largely due to carbon emissions.

Moreover, the last 15 warmest years on record have occurred since 2005, with the most recent eight years being the warmest, according to NASA.

Investigations show that practically None of the signatories to the "World Climate Declaration" are climate scientists.

The two main Dutch actors behind the declaration are Guus Berkhout, a retired geophysicist who has worked for oil giant Shell, and journalist Marcel Crok. Both have been accused of receiving money from fossil fuel companies to finance their climate-sceptic work. They deny the allegations,

When looking closer at the list of signatories, there are precisely 1,107, including six people who are dead. Less than 1% of the names listed describe themselves as climatologists or climate scientists.

Eight of the signatories are former or current employees of the oil giant Shell, while many other names have links to mining companies.

One of the signatories is Ivar Giaever, a joint winner of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1973 for work on superconductors. However, he has never published any work on climate science.

According to an independent 2019 count of the declaration's signatories, 21% were engineers, many linked to the fossil fuel industry. Others were lobbyists, and some even worked as fishermen or airline pilots.
[.....]

Fact check: Did 1,200 climate experts sign viral misinformation?

A document claiming that 'there is no climate emergency' has been circulating on social media. #TheCube
www.euronews.com

www.euronews.com
`
`
 
Instead of endlessly trying to figure out WHO to PARROT, just CHECK THE DATA...


Highly correlated satellite and balloon data shows NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite rising Co2..

THEORY REJECTED


Who THE FUCK CARES what conflicted taxpayer funded liars have to say about the above truth.

Co2 does NOTHING.
 

You stupid MAGAt Troll. One sees these bogus petitions all the time.​

I could get more than this from Liberty University disagreeing with Evolution.



Fact check: Did 1,200 climate experts sign 'declaration' denying climate emergency?​


16/09/2022 -

A document claiming that 'there is no climate emergency' has been circulating on social media.

A climate-denying document, supposedly signed by 1,200 leading scientists and academics, has gone viral on social media.
The "World Climate Declaration" -- which claims that there is "no climate emergency" -- was first shared on 27 June. One Australian Senator shared the document on Facebook claiming that "this is further confirmation that there is no climate emergency".

Other well-known Conspiracy groups have argued that there is no scientific consensus that humans are to blame for global warming because the “Earth's climate has varied since the planet first existed, with naturally occurring cold and warm phases".

A 2021 report by Cornell University found that 99.9% of more than 88,000 climate change studies agree that humans have accelerated the phenomenon, largely due to carbon emissions.

Moreover, the last 15 warmest years on record have occurred since 2005, with the most recent eight years being the warmest, according to NASA.

Investigations show that practically None of the signatories to the "World Climate Declaration" are climate scientists.

The two main Dutch actors behind the declaration are Guus Berkhout, a retired geophysicist who has worked for oil giant Shell, and journalist Marcel Crok. Both have been accused of receiving money from fossil fuel companies to finance their climate-sceptic work. They deny the allegations,

When looking closer at the list of signatories, there are precisely 1,107, including six people who are dead. Less than 1% of the names listed describe themselves as climatologists or climate scientists.

Eight of the signatories are former or current employees of the oil giant Shell, while many other names have links to mining companies.

One of the signatories is Ivar Giaever, a joint winner of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1973 for work on superconductors. However, he has never published any work on climate science.

According to an independent 2019 count of the declaration's signatories, 21% were engineers, many linked to the fossil fuel industry. Others were lobbyists, and some even worked as fishermen or airline pilots.
[.....]

Fact check: Did 1,200 climate experts sign viral misinformation?

A document claiming that 'there is no climate emergency' has been circulating on social media. #TheCube
www.euronews.com

www.euronews.com
`
`
My petition signed by scientists supersedes yours.
Therefore my science wins.
 
Cool. A group of people with much less climate knowledge that I have is talking out of their butts for political reasons. Nobody cares.

The rational people talk about the science. The political-driven crazies rave about their various conspiracies. That's because, since all of the science directly contradicts them, they can't talk about the science.

Go on, deniers. Scream some more about socialism. Go down the list of your cult's talking points. That'll show 'em how rational you are.

I do agree, follow the money. All of the corrupting bribe money flows to denier scammers, thus all of the fraud and garbage pseudoscience comes form the denier side. No "scientist" embraces something as reality-defying as denialism unless they're getting paid to do so.
Fqo0kIeWwAA9yt4.jpeg
 
8 identical EMPTY 2 WORD posts to respond to one, and in fact cherry picking older studies and Conspicuously leaving out the Latest and most relevant studies with the highest numbers.
DISHONEST A$$hole Spammer to cover NO content.
`
Pretty funny coming from someone who claims Galileo was the first scientist in human history.
 
lil crick is about as dumb as they get. Never reading anything the idiot posts. Let us all take a good look at who signed on as a scientist that "believes".

crick is more like bat shit crazy, hard to tell, either way, AGW is fake, when they got to get the Director of Bats to pretend he is a scientist long enough to sign onboard.

Nunez-Mino, Jose Director Bat Conservation Trust United Kingdom of Great Britain
11,092 names on that list and you could only come up with ONE that you could deride? And perhaps you might have looked him up first. This fellow has a fucking PhD from Oxford. Here's his CV from LinkedIn

Experience​

  • The Bat Conservation Trust Graphic

    Director of Communications and Fundraising​

    The Bat Conservation Trust

    Jan 2014 - Present9 years 9 months
    Vauxhall, London
    I direct and manage Bat Conservation Trust's (BCT's) communications, fundraising, outreach and engagement strategy and delivery. A central part of my role is to promote BCT’s authority as the UK’s leading NGO on bats and a key European and international leader.
  • Timber Trade Programme Officer​

    TRAFFIC.ORG​

    Jul 2012 - Jan 20141 year 7 months
    Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Developing TRAFFIC Europe’s regional timber trade programme and responsible for the implementation of timber trade related projects in Europe. Supporting TRAFFIC´s Global Timber Trade programme.
  • Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Graphic

    Field Project Manager​

    Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust

    Oct 2009 - Jul 20122 years 10 months
    Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
    Field project manager for collaborative Darwin Initiative project called "The Last Survivors - saving the hutia and solenodon". Partners include Sociedad Ornitologica de la Hispaniola (SOH), Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust (DWCT), Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and Dominican Republic National Zoo (Zoodom).
  • Operation Wallacea Graphic

    Senior Biodiversity Research Coordinator (Honduras)​

    Operation Wallacea

    Oct 2005 - Jul 20093 years 10 months
    Throughout my time in Honduras I have carried our scientific research as well as coordinated/supervised a large group of scientific staff, local people, students and volunteers. I have liaised with a variety of stakeholders: local communities, other NGOs, government officials (all levels), educational organisations, army representatives and the local media (newspaper, radio and television). I have also been responsible for promoting our work via presentations & preparing publications for varied audiences.







    God you're stupid.


 
11,092 names on that list and you could only come up with ONE that you could deride? And perhaps you might have looked him up first. This fellow has a fucking PhD from Oxford. Here's his CV from LinkedIn

Experience​

  • The Bat Conservation Trust Graphic

    Director of Communications and Fundraising​

    The Bat Conservation Trust

    Jan 2014 - Present9 years 9 months
    Vauxhall, London
    I direct and manage Bat Conservation Trust's (BCT's) communications, fundraising, outreach and engagement strategy and delivery. A central part of my role is to promote BCT’s authority as the UK’s leading NGO on bats and a key European and international leader.
  • Timber Trade Programme Officer​

    TRAFFIC.ORG​

    Jul 2012 - Jan 20141 year 7 months
    Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Developing TRAFFIC Europe’s regional timber trade programme and responsible for the implementation of timber trade related projects in Europe. Supporting TRAFFIC´s Global Timber Trade programme.
  • Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Graphic

    Field Project Manager​

    Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust

    Oct 2009 - Jul 20122 years 10 months
    Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
    Field project manager for collaborative Darwin Initiative project called "The Last Survivors - saving the hutia and solenodon". Partners include Sociedad Ornitologica de la Hispaniola (SOH), Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust (DWCT), Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and Dominican Republic National Zoo (Zoodom).
  • Operation Wallacea Graphic

    Senior Biodiversity Research Coordinator (Honduras)​

    Operation Wallacea

    Oct 2005 - Jul 20093 years 10 months
    Throughout my time in Honduras I have carried our scientific research as well as coordinated/supervised a large group of scientific staff, local people, students and volunteers. I have liaised with a variety of stakeholders: local communities, other NGOs, government officials (all levels), educational organisations, army representatives and the local media (newspaper, radio and television). I have also been responsible for promoting our work via presentations & preparing publications for varied audiences.







    God you're stupid.

And all of them have their salaries linked to keeping the myth alive.
 
if you disagree, give us your figure, just because you dont know and lack common sense does not mean everyone else is wrong
Not how it works, You made a claim.

Back it up or admit you pulled it outta yer ass.
 
and none of them are smarter than the average person, some even lack common sense. Some can work in the field, some are only book smart.



Most of the Co2 FRAUD's climate "scientists" are rejects from other areas of science. They are there because they can be trusted to lie and fudge data and keep quiet while getting rich in the process.
 
Over 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel Peace Prize winners, have signed a declaration that says that the claim of a climate "emergency" is a myth.

More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate 'emergency' a myth

EXCERPT:

A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they “strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being pushed across the globe. The declaration does not deny the harmful effect of greenhouse gasses, but instead challenges the hysteria brought about by the narrative of imminent doom. . . .

“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures,” the declaration says.
Keep in mind, believing there is no emergency is not saying that climate change is a hoax nor that fossil fuels are not a primary cause. I personally, don't agree with most the emergency proposals because if they were implemented, they would fail because they are not practically. The pace of eliminating fossil fuels will move only so fast regardless of goverment or international consortium agreements.

For example, in the US 80% of EV Charging is done at home, yet nearly half of the owners of gas powered vehicles have no way of charging an EV at home or at work. These people are not going to buy EV's when they have no reliable way of charging their vehicle.
Secondly, we haved to expand the number of charging stations in shopping centers, motels and hotels and other places significantly. Also the conversion to electric vehicles is going require a far better grid system than we have now and that is just not happening now. All of this is very possible but not within the time frames that are being discussed. It is a waste of money to initiate plans that will fail. The fact that the democrat party is intent on moving rapidly ahead and republican party is intent on reversing what democrats do is another reason to move slowly.
 
Last edited:
Keep in mind, believing there is no emergency is not saying that climate change is a hoax nor that fossil fuels are not a primary cause. I personally, don't agree with most the emergency proposals because if they were implemented, they would fail because they are not practically. The pace of eliminating fossil fuels will move only so fast regardless of goverment or international consortium agreements.

For example, in the US 80% of EV Charging is done at home, yet nearly half of the owners of gas powered vehicles have no way of charging an EV at home or at work. These people are not going to buy EV's when they have no reliable way of charging their vehicle.
Secondly, we haved to expand the number of charging stations in shopping centers, motels and hotels and other place significantly. Also the conversation to electric is going require a far better grid system than we have now and that is just not happening now. All of this is very possible but not within the time frames that are being discussed. It is a waste of money to initiate plans that will fail. The fact that the democrat party is intent of moving rapidly ahead and republican party is intent on reversing what democrats do is another reason to move slowly.

More nuclear and more fracking.
Wind and solar won't cut it.
 
Not how it works, You made a claim.

Back it up or admit you pulled it outta yer ass.
actually this is exactly how it works

I told you how much, you disagree, now it is up to you to refute my facts. If you can not refute my facts it is because you do not know your ass from a hole in the ground

even in this thread, abu afk admits it will take a minimum of 22,000 sq miles of solar panels. That is without the capacity factor.

With the capacity factor we are looking at no less than 100,000 sq miles of solar panels. Add batteries that need charging and we could easily need 200,000 sq miles of solar panels.
 
actually this is exactly how it works

I told you how much, you disagree, now it is up to you to refute my facts. If you can not refute my facts it is because you do not know your ass from a hole in the ground

even in this thread, abu afk admits it will take a minimum of 22,000 sq miles of solar panels. That is without the capacity factor.

With the capacity factor we are looking at no less than 100,000 sq miles of solar panels. Add batteries that need charging and we could easily need 200,000 sq miles of solar panels.
YOu didn't provide any facts to refute. You made a claim without evidence and I asked you to back it up. In true republican fashion you have twisted, turned, lied, and obfuscated but not once posted a single fact to back up your absurd claim.

And I must admit I knew you wouldn't. That's the republican way these days. Tell a lie and dare someone to prove it wrong.
 

Forum List

Back
Top