georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #281
Because it's a big country only a national response (like the one New York and New Jersey adopted last spring) would have prevented our national disgrace (unless you think 4% of the world's population warrants 25% of the world's Covid-19 total deaths); are you too tired of winning yet?It's a big country out there, and all of the areas weren't affected equally...
So there wasn't a "National" (or "one size fits all") solution...
National responses to the COVID-19 pandemic - Wikipedia
"On 28 January 2020, the federal government publicly released its approach to COVID-19 testing.[475]
"Despite this, the U.S. testing effort was slow, obscuring the extent of the outbreak.[476][477]
"Many of the 160,000 test kits produced in February were found to be defective and were not used.[476]
"Academic laboratories, hospitals and private companies were not allowed to use their own tests until 29 February, when the FDA started issuing approvals for them.[476]
"Initially, there were eligibility restrictions for receiving a COVID-19 test (based on recent international travel, hospitalization for respiratory illness, or contact with another person already diagnosed with COVID-19).
"By 27 February, fewer than 4,000 tests had been conducted in the United States.
He's too stupid to be POTUS.