Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BTW, point of reference, I was a baby once, I grew into a teenager and learned some things, then i had a child and learned some more, now i have grand children and learned some more, I have life experiences that are far more valuable than your lazy shit for brains consultant money. so again your point?why would he or I have to? Just curious. I don't write articles or journals for money. not clear what your point is other than you have no point.hahahahahahaha, Peer review is ok as long as all ideas are allowed. As stated over and over and over on here that isn't how it works today. With the Internet available and other means of getting information at one's finger tips, to disregard opposing views is disingenuous and leaves the public tasting bull shit repeatedly as good ideas and valuable data are pushed aside because opposing ideas and data are not allowed in today's peer review. That's definitely too bad. Valuable input ignored is not good for anyone. But hey, the money can only go the true believers. LOL
Nonsense. Peer review is intended to make sure the paper meets the requirements of the scientific method, not to be used as a sounding board for every crackpot who wants to promote an agenda.
Unfortunately that isn't what it does any longer, especially in the case of climatology.
I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
high efficiency light bulbs are hazardous to our health, why would I use them. I have a smart thermostat, I don't touch it after it's programmed. I use grid electric, you?funny thing reality isn't it? You have to suffer through it. want my money prove your theory. How many times would you like me to say that?why would he or I have to? Just curious. I don't write articles or journals for money. not clear what your point is other than you have no point.I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
Oh, and if you truly believe your bs, then stop driving and move out of your house and take no more trips on planes and trains. limit yourself to meat you raise and crops you grow. start by making an example that you indeed believe your own shit.
Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
I hate when people have no object lessons, and you fail daily if you use any material that is man made. FAIL!!!why do you recycle? You don't buy product from a store do you? It's all man made evil shit. aren't you afraid you'll melt?funny thing reality isn't it? You have to suffer through it. want my money prove your theory. How many times would you like me to say that?why would he or I have to? Just curious. I don't write articles or journals for money. not clear what your point is other than you have no point.
I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
Oh, and if you truly believe your bs, then stop driving and move out of your house and take no more trips on planes and trains. limit yourself to meat you raise and crops you grow. start by making an example that you indeed believe your own shit.
Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
Do you poop in a toilet or do you use your yard? do you wipe with paper or leaf?
You've lost your mind. Must be painful for you.
oh one isn't, what about those mercury bulbs?high efficiency light bulbs are hazardous to our health, why would I use them. I have a smart thermostat, I don't touch it after it's programmed. I use grid electric, you?funny thing reality isn't it? You have to suffer through it. want my money prove your theory. How many times would you like me to say that?why would he or I have to? Just curious. I don't write articles or journals for money. not clear what your point is other than you have no point.
I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
Oh, and if you truly believe your bs, then stop driving and move out of your house and take no more trips on planes and trains. limit yourself to meat you raise and crops you grow. start by making an example that you indeed believe your own shit.
Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
LED lights are completely safe, dummy.
BTW, point of reference, I was a baby once, I grew into a teenager and learned some things, then i had a child and learned some more, now i have grand children and learned some more, I have life experiences that are far more valuable than your lazy shit for brains consultant money. so again your point?why would he or I have to? Just curious. I don't write articles or journals for money. not clear what your point is other than you have no point.Nonsense. Peer review is intended to make sure the paper meets the requirements of the scientific method, not to be used as a sounding board for every crackpot who wants to promote an agenda.
Unfortunately that isn't what it does any longer, especially in the case of climatology.
I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
I know more in my little finger than you do in your entire frame. but you'll keep telling yourself you matter. funny stuff dude.BTW, point of reference, I was a baby once, I grew into a teenager and learned some things, then i had a child and learned some more, now i have grand children and learned some more, I have life experiences that are far more valuable than your lazy shit for brains consultant money. so again your point?why would he or I have to? Just curious. I don't write articles or journals for money. not clear what your point is other than you have no point.Unfortunately that isn't what it does any longer, especially in the case of climatology.
I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
But then, you haven't had the need to hire me for my expertise, so you once again have no frame of reference from which to make an informed conclusion. This is what you do all the time here, and it is painful to watch.
I hate when people have no object lessons, and you fail daily if you use any material that is man made. FAIL!!!why do you recycle? You don't buy product from a store do you? It's all man made evil shit. aren't you afraid you'll melt?funny thing reality isn't it? You have to suffer through it. want my money prove your theory. How many times would you like me to say that?I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
Oh, and if you truly believe your bs, then stop driving and move out of your house and take no more trips on planes and trains. limit yourself to meat you raise and crops you grow. start by making an example that you indeed believe your own shit.
Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
Do you poop in a toilet or do you use your yard? do you wipe with paper or leaf?
You've lost your mind. Must be painful for you.
oh one isn't, what about those mercury bulbs?high efficiency light bulbs are hazardous to our health, why would I use them. I have a smart thermostat, I don't touch it after it's programmed. I use grid electric, you?funny thing reality isn't it? You have to suffer through it. want my money prove your theory. How many times would you like me to say that?I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
Oh, and if you truly believe your bs, then stop driving and move out of your house and take no more trips on planes and trains. limit yourself to meat you raise and crops you grow. start by making an example that you indeed believe your own shit.
Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
LED lights are completely safe, dummy.
hahahahahahaha, Peer review is ok as long as all ideas are allowed. As stated over and over and over on here that isn't how it works today. With the Internet available and other means of getting information at one's finger tips, to disregard opposing views is disingenuous and leaves the public tasting bull shit repeatedly as good ideas and valuable data are pushed aside because opposing ideas and data are not allowed in today's peer review. That's definitely too bad. Valuable input ignored is not good for anyone. But hey, the money can only go the true believers. LOL
Nonsense. Peer review is intended to make sure the paper meets the requirements of the scientific method, not to be used as a sounding board for every crackpot who wants to promote an agenda.
Unfortunately that isn't what it does any longer, especially in the case of climatology.
I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
Your theory that we have to do something to know about it would means nobody would know that drinking poison is a bad idea.
You drink poison every day and don't even know it.
I know more in my little finger than you do in your entire frame. but you'll keep telling yourself you matter. funny stuff dude.BTW, point of reference, I was a baby once, I grew into a teenager and learned some things, then i had a child and learned some more, now i have grand children and learned some more, I have life experiences that are far more valuable than your lazy shit for brains consultant money. so again your point?why would he or I have to? Just curious. I don't write articles or journals for money. not clear what your point is other than you have no point.I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
But then, you haven't had the need to hire me for my expertise, so you once again have no frame of reference from which to make an informed conclusion. This is what you do all the time here, and it is painful to watch.
Nonsense. Peer review is intended to make sure the paper meets the requirements of the scientific method, not to be used as a sounding board for every crackpot who wants to promote an agenda.
Unfortunately that isn't what it does any longer, especially in the case of climatology.
I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
Your theory that we have to do something to know about it would means nobody would know that drinking poison is a bad idea.
You drink poison every day and don't even know it.
Non sequitur. Your theory in peer review is stupid, obviously.
right? and then they made them to replace the incandescent ones in regular bulbs.I hate when people have no object lessons, and you fail daily if you use any material that is man made. FAIL!!!why do you recycle? You don't buy product from a store do you? It's all man made evil shit. aren't you afraid you'll melt?funny thing reality isn't it? You have to suffer through it. want my money prove your theory. How many times would you like me to say that?
Oh, and if you truly believe your bs, then stop driving and move out of your house and take no more trips on planes and trains. limit yourself to meat you raise and crops you grow. start by making an example that you indeed believe your own shit.
Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
Do you poop in a toilet or do you use your yard? do you wipe with paper or leaf?
You've lost your mind. Must be painful for you.
Right. S
oh one isn't, what about those mercury bulbs?high efficiency light bulbs are hazardous to our health, why would I use them. I have a smart thermostat, I don't touch it after it's programmed. I use grid electric, you?funny thing reality isn't it? You have to suffer through it. want my money prove your theory. How many times would you like me to say that?
Oh, and if you truly believe your bs, then stop driving and move out of your house and take no more trips on planes and trains. limit yourself to meat you raise and crops you grow. start by making an example that you indeed believe your own shit.
Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
LED lights are completely safe, dummy.
Which mercury bulbs? There are hundreds of them, most of which were around well before this incandescent bru ha ha became your reality.
well how would you know. I'm so much smarter than you you would never understand it.I know more in my little finger than you do in your entire frame. but you'll keep telling yourself you matter. funny stuff dude.BTW, point of reference, I was a baby once, I grew into a teenager and learned some things, then i had a child and learned some more, now i have grand children and learned some more, I have life experiences that are far more valuable than your lazy shit for brains consultant money. so again your point?why would he or I have to? Just curious. I don't write articles or journals for money. not clear what your point is other than you have no point.
I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
But then, you haven't had the need to hire me for my expertise, so you once again have no frame of reference from which to make an informed conclusion. This is what you do all the time here, and it is painful to watch.
You haven't proven it to anyone here, certainly not to me.
Unfortunately that isn't what it does any longer, especially in the case of climatology.
I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
Your theory that we have to do something to know about it would means nobody would know that drinking poison is a bad idea.
You drink poison every day and don't even know it.
Non sequitur. Your theory in peer review is stupid, obviously.
So you are good with drinking poison every day?
he don't know, he's just a geologist who gets paid to be a consultant writer on message boards. he's admitted it today!!!!!I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
Your theory that we have to do something to know about it would means nobody would know that drinking poison is a bad idea.
You drink poison every day and don't even know it.
Non sequitur. Your theory in peer review is stupid, obviously.
So you are good with drinking poison every day?
What does that have to do with your idiotic theory on peer review?
right? and then they made them to replace the incandescent ones in regular bulbs.I hate when people have no object lessons, and you fail daily if you use any material that is man made. FAIL!!!why do you recycle? You don't buy product from a store do you? It's all man made evil shit. aren't you afraid you'll melt?Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
Do you poop in a toilet or do you use your yard? do you wipe with paper or leaf?
You've lost your mind. Must be painful for you.
Right. S
oh one isn't, what about those mercury bulbs?high efficiency light bulbs are hazardous to our health, why would I use them. I have a smart thermostat, I don't touch it after it's programmed. I use grid electric, you?Erm, what? Haven't flown in years. I put about 5,000 miles/year on my car. I recycle, use only high efficiency light bulbs, and keep my thermostat low in the winter and high in the summer. You?
LED lights are completely safe, dummy.
Which mercury bulbs? There are hundreds of them, most of which were around well before this incandescent bru ha ha became your reality.
well how would you know. I'm so much smarter than you you would never understand it.I know more in my little finger than you do in your entire frame. but you'll keep telling yourself you matter. funny stuff dude.BTW, point of reference, I was a baby once, I grew into a teenager and learned some things, then i had a child and learned some more, now i have grand children and learned some more, I have life experiences that are far more valuable than your lazy shit for brains consultant money. so again your point?I don't either. I have never been paid for any of my peer reviewed work, though I have been paid as a consultant for all of my reports. You? The point is that you don't have a point of reference, and no expertise or experience on the matter. Don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing as some one claiming to be in the know on a subject and then proving your ignorance to everyone else. It is painful to watch.
But then, you haven't had the need to hire me for my expertise, so you once again have no frame of reference from which to make an informed conclusion. This is what you do all the time here, and it is painful to watch.
You haven't proven it to anyone here, certainly not to me.
Correction you don't understand it
Unfortunately that isn't what it does any longer, especially in the case of climatology.
I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
Your theory that we have to do something to know about it would means nobody would know that drinking poison is a bad idea.
You drink poison every day and don't even know it.
Non sequitur. Your theory in peer review is stupid, obviously.
So you are good with drinking poison every day?
I'll ask you the same question. Have you ever gone through the scientific peer review process? Of course you haven't. Next.
Your theory that we have to do something to know about it would means nobody would know that drinking poison is a bad idea.
You drink poison every day and don't even know it.
Non sequitur. Your theory in peer review is stupid, obviously.
So you are good with drinking poison every day?
What does that have to do with your idiotic theory on peer review?
offend me? never used that word so you're out in left field. You can read my other posts to learn what I actually stated about mercury bulbs. big word there bulbs.well how would you know. I'm so much smarter than you you would never understand it.I know more in my little finger than you do in your entire frame. but you'll keep telling yourself you matter. funny stuff dude.BTW, point of reference, I was a baby once, I grew into a teenager and learned some things, then i had a child and learned some more, now i have grand children and learned some more, I have life experiences that are far more valuable than your lazy shit for brains consultant money. so again your point?
But then, you haven't had the need to hire me for my expertise, so you once again have no frame of reference from which to make an informed conclusion. This is what you do all the time here, and it is painful to watch.
You haven't proven it to anyone here, certainly not to me.
Correction you don't understand it
And yet you can't even say which mercury bulbs offend you and why?
