Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Daily Caller?
Isn't that the outfit that bribed a prostitute to lie about Senator Menedez?
Conservative website accused of paying prostitutes to lie about sex with senator - CBS News
Dunno why anyone sources an outfit that lies..
Typical moonbat response. You can't handle the truth, so you try to attack the messenger.
From this side, it looks like gullible wingnuts taking misleading op-eds at face value as God's Honest Truth.
There's very good reason to dismiss the OP - unsurprisingly, it's almost completely a lie.
In all but a few cases, what they claim are "reasons" that will prevent people from keeping their insurance are companies opting not to offer plans in the exchanges.
Since no one (other than members of Congress and their staffs) is forced to purchase their insurance on the exchanges, there is no reason that Aetna choosing not to offer plans in an exchange will cause anyone who already is insured by Aetna to lose their plans.
The exchanges are for people who currently are NOT insured, not people who already have insurance.
Many of the other examples given are equally misleading. The fact that 54% of Californians think that they will have to change their insurance isn't evidence that they're right - in fact, your article even says that under their "prediction", only 54,000 Californians could lose their insurance, which is 0.14%.
Typical moonbat response. You can't handle the truth, so you try to attack the messenger.
From this side, it looks like gullible wingnuts taking misleading op-eds at face value as God's Honest Truth.
There's very good reason to dismiss the OP - unsurprisingly, it's almost completely a lie.
In all but a few cases, what they claim are "reasons" that will prevent people from keeping their insurance are companies opting not to offer plans in the exchanges.
Since no one (other than members of Congress and their staffs) is forced to purchase their insurance on the exchanges, there is no reason that Aetna choosing not to offer plans in an exchange will cause anyone who already is insured by Aetna to lose their plans.
The exchanges are for people who currently are NOT insured, not people who already have insurance.
Many of the other examples given are equally misleading. The fact that 54% of Californians think that they will have to change their insurance isn't evidence that they're right - in fact, your article even says that under their "prediction", only 54,000 Californians could lose their insurance, which is 0.14%.
Seems like some people are against capitalism. I always thought companies that can't compete went belly up. Now we are learning Republicans are against real competition for your healthcare business. Frickin amazing.
The Daily Caller?
Isn't that the outfit that bribed a prostitute to lie about Senator Menedez?
Conservative website accused of paying prostitutes to lie about sex with senator - CBS News
Dunno why anyone sources an outfit that lies..
Typical moonbat response. You can't handle the truth, so you try to attack the messenger.
The Daily Caller?
Isn't that the outfit that bribed a prostitute to lie about Senator Menedez?
Conservative website accused of paying prostitutes to lie about sex with senator - CBS News
Dunno why anyone sources an outfit that lies..
Typical moonbat response. You can't handle the truth, so you try to attack the messenger.
Try?
They got caught in a big fucking lie.
There's no try. The Daily Caller is essentially done.
No one sources them any more, but loons.
Is your state one of them?
President Barack Obama famously promised, “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.” He later got even more specific.
“If you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job, or Medicare, or Medicaid, or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have,” Obama said.
California, Missouri, Connecticut, Maryland, South Carolina, New York, New Jersey, Iowa, Wisconsin and Georgia.
Read here to see why and how they are affected and is your state next? Hint: The insurers who are dropping out.
Ten states where Obamacare wipes out health care plans | The Daily Caller
So some companies do not want to be competitive with other companies and have chosen to drop out. I thought that is how capitalism works. If you can't compete, you go out of business.
There's no freedom of choice when every dollar you make is spent on daily living.
The Daily Caller?
Isn't that the outfit that bribed a prostitute to lie about Senator Menedez?
Conservative website accused of paying prostitutes to lie about sex with senator - CBS News
Dunno why anyone sources an outfit that lies..
From this side, it looks like gullible wingnuts taking misleading op-eds at face value as God's Honest Truth.
There's very good reason to dismiss the OP - unsurprisingly, it's almost completely a lie.
In all but a few cases, what they claim are "reasons" that will prevent people from keeping their insurance are companies opting not to offer plans in the exchanges.
Since no one (other than members of Congress and their staffs) is forced to purchase their insurance on the exchanges, there is no reason that Aetna choosing not to offer plans in an exchange will cause anyone who already is insured by Aetna to lose their plans.
The exchanges are for people who currently are NOT insured, not people who already have insurance.
Many of the other examples given are equally misleading. The fact that 54% of Californians think that they will have to change their insurance isn't evidence that they're right - in fact, your article even says that under their "prediction", only 54,000 Californians could lose their insurance, which is 0.14%.
Seems like some people are against capitalism. I always thought companies that can't compete went belly up. Now we are learning Republicans are against real competition for your healthcare business. Frickin amazing.
There have always been websites to compare shop for insurance, so you wait for the government to get involved before you bother? Some people seem parallelized without big daddy government..... What a joke
Seems like some people are against capitalism. I always thought companies that can't compete went belly up. Now we are learning Republicans are against real competition for your healthcare business. Frickin amazing.
There have always been websites to compare shop for insurance, so you wait for the government to get involved before you bother? Some people seem parallelized without big daddy government..... What a joke
I always comparison shopped for my health insurance, until my insurance company dumped me due to a condition I developed and decided they no longer wanted to insure me.
The Daily Caller?
Isn't that the outfit that bribed a prostitute to lie about Senator Menedez?
Conservative website accused of paying prostitutes to lie about sex with senator - CBS News
Dunno why anyone sources an outfit that lies..
There have always been websites to compare shop for insurance, so you wait for the government to get involved before you bother? Some people seem parallelized without big daddy government..... What a joke
I always comparison shopped for my health insurance, until my insurance company dumped me due to a condition I developed and decided they no longer wanted to insure me.
Me too, and that would have been a simple fix, but the Government wants to run the thing, big mistake prices are higher then ever.
The Daily Caller?
Isn't that the outfit that bribed a prostitute to lie about Senator Menedez?
Conservative website accused of paying prostitutes to lie about sex with senator - CBS News
Dunno why anyone sources an outfit that lies..
so prove it wrong Sallow....i havent been hearing encouraging things about this on quite a few news outlets out here......many others have been saying we will just have to wait and see.....others think its going to be great....but there is a lot of unsureness about this thing out here....
The Daily Caller?
Isn't that the outfit that bribed a prostitute to lie about Senator Menedez?
Conservative website accused of paying prostitutes to lie about sex with senator - CBS News
Dunno why anyone sources an outfit that lies..
so prove it wrong Sallow....i havent been hearing encouraging things about this on quite a few news outlets out here......many others have been saying we will just have to wait and see.....others think its going to be great....but there is a lot of unsureness about this thing out here....
I pointed out exactly how the article in the OP is very misleading, if not an outright lie, back on the first page of this thread.
No one really seemed that interested.
so prove it wrong Sallow....i havent been hearing encouraging things about this on quite a few news outlets out here......many others have been saying we will just have to wait and see.....others think its going to be great....but there is a lot of unsureness about this thing out here....
I pointed out exactly how the article in the OP is very misleading, if not an outright lie, back on the first page of this thread.
No one really seemed that interested.
that doesnt change the fact that i have seen more than one news item on TV or elsewhere that did not exactly make you feel confident about this thing....
Typical moonbat response. You can't handle the truth, so you try to attack the messenger.
From this side, it looks like gullible wingnuts taking misleading op-eds at face value as God's Honest Truth.
There's very good reason to dismiss the OP - unsurprisingly, it's almost completely a lie.
In all but a few cases, what they claim are "reasons" that will prevent people from keeping their insurance are companies opting not to offer plans in the exchanges.
Since no one (other than members of Congress and their staffs) is forced to purchase their insurance on the exchanges, there is no reason that Aetna choosing not to offer plans in an exchange will cause anyone who already is insured by Aetna to lose their plans.
The exchanges are for people who currently are NOT insured, not people who already have insurance.
Many of the other examples given are equally misleading. The fact that 54% of Californians think that they will have to change their insurance isn't evidence that they're right - in fact, your article even says that under their "prediction", only 54,000 Californians could lose their insurance, which is 0.14%.
The foot is in the door and they're already showing how plan offerings will show losses of previous insurances in certain instances.
Those instances show occurrences already and will trend upward, not downward imho.
From this side, it looks like gullible wingnuts taking misleading op-eds at face value as God's Honest Truth.
There's very good reason to dismiss the OP - unsurprisingly, it's almost completely a lie.
In all but a few cases, what they claim are "reasons" that will prevent people from keeping their insurance are companies opting not to offer plans in the exchanges.
Since no one (other than members of Congress and their staffs) is forced to purchase their insurance on the exchanges, there is no reason that Aetna choosing not to offer plans in an exchange will cause anyone who already is insured by Aetna to lose their plans.
The exchanges are for people who currently are NOT insured, not people who already have insurance.
Many of the other examples given are equally misleading. The fact that 54% of Californians think that they will have to change their insurance isn't evidence that they're right - in fact, your article even says that under their "prediction", only 54,000 Californians could lose their insurance, which is 0.14%.
The foot is in the door and they're already showing how plan offerings will show losses of previous insurances in certain instances.
Those instances show occurrences already and will trend upward, not downward imho.
The definitive word is currently.
It sounds as though you believe the path of losses to individual choice will trend downward? There will be more choice, not less?
The foot is in the door and they're already showing how plan offerings will show losses of previous insurances in certain instances.
Those instances show occurrences already and will trend upward, not downward imho.
The definitive word is currently.
It sounds as though you believe the path of losses to individual choice will trend downward? There will be more choice, not less?
Nothing I've said implies anything like that, nor is that the slightest bit relevant to anything I've said.
What you or I think will happen at some hypothetical point in the future has very little to do with the fallacies of the OP.
President Obama’s health care law will push 7 million people out of their job-based insurance coverage — nearly twice the previous estimate, according to the latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office released Tuesday.
During the health care debate Mr. Obama had said individuals would be able to keep their plans.
The definitive word is currently.
It sounds as though you believe the path of losses to individual choice will trend downward? There will be more choice, not less?
Nothing I've said implies anything like that, nor is that the slightest bit relevant to anything I've said.
What you or I think will happen at some hypothetical point in the future has very little to do with the fallacies of the OP.
The trending is currently occurring. It's just begun and the idea that there's not going to be any trending or that trending doesn't matter is telling and the OP addresses this.
You don't. Imho, you are in stasis and see no trending. Time will tell.
You won't.President Obamas health care law will push 7 million people out of their job-based insurance coverage nearly twice the previous estimate, according to the latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office released Tuesday.
During the health care debate Mr. Obama had said individuals would be able to keep their plans.
Seven million will lose insurance under Obama health law - Washington Times
Is your state one of them?
President Barack Obama famously promised, “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.” He later got even more specific.
“If you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job, or Medicare, or Medicaid, or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have,” Obama said.
California, Missouri, Connecticut, Maryland, South Carolina, New York, New Jersey, Iowa, Wisconsin and Georgia.
Read here to see why and how they are affected and is your state next? Hint: The insurers who are dropping out.
Ten states where Obamacare wipes out health care plans | The Daily Caller
Nothing I've said implies anything like that, nor is that the slightest bit relevant to anything I've said.
What you or I think will happen at some hypothetical point in the future has very little to do with the fallacies of the OP.
The trending is currently occurring. It's just begun and the idea that there's not going to be any trending or that trending doesn't matter is telling and the OP addresses this.
You don't. Imho, you are in stasis and see no trending. Time will tell.
You won't.
During the health care debate Mr. Obama had said individuals would be able to keep their plans.
Seven million will lose insurance under Obama health law - Washington Times
Slippery-Slope fallacies, no matter how many times you repeat them, don't make the OP any less bullshit.
