Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Because much like our American mass murderers, they can't stand the thought of being locked up--especially for years. They want to kill as many people as possible and then kill themselves to avoid the torture of prison. Lord only knows what our American prisoners do to these guys if they ever get into our prison system.
yet you right wingers are pissing yourselves at the thought of closing Gitmo and putting them in the real prisons... Right wing logic never stops the Crazy.
An armed citizen or officer can wound a subject disabling him from suicide and limiting their kill count. That's the very last thing these maniacs want. As you pointed out, they do want to die and hook up with these ugly virgins. So they look for places where their mission can be completed to their satisfaction.
Right, guy. You know, here's the thing. We have 300 million guns in this country, and these mass shooting incidents are never stopped. We have one every couple of weeks. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has one about every 14 years. Japan has never had one. Australia hasn't had one since they banned private gun ownership in 1996. It seems odd to me that if guns could 'limit' these things, we'd have many many more of them than the Europeans and Asians have.
Witnesses at the concert in Paris told their story of how these guys walked down the aisles totally fearless; like a farmer walking through his pig sty just killing randomly. There was no reason to duck, no reason to hide, because nobody there had the ability to defend themselves from an armed terrorist.
Yes, but oddly enough, the same could be said of Loughner or Lanza or Holmes or Cho, all of whom walked around killing people with no impediment either.
If guns made us safer, we'd have the lowest crime rates, not the highest.
In gun-free zones, we are no better than Europe or Japan. It's just like Paris; everybody is a sitting duck. Nobody has the ability to defend themselves because nobody has any weapons on them.
Yes, clearly we need those pre-schoolers to be packing.
Because much like our American mass murderers, they can't stand the thought of being locked up--especially for years. They want to kill as many people as possible and then kill themselves to avoid the torture of prison. Lord only knows what our American prisoners do to these guys if they ever get into our prison system.
yet you right wingers are pissing yourselves at the thought of closing Gitmo and putting them in the real prisons... Right wing logic never stops the Crazy.
An armed citizen or officer can wound a subject disabling him from suicide and limiting their kill count. That's the very last thing these maniacs want. As you pointed out, they do want to die and hook up with these ugly virgins. So they look for places where their mission can be completed to their satisfaction.
Right, guy. You know, here's the thing. We have 300 million guns in this country, and these mass shooting incidents are never stopped. We have one every couple of weeks. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has one about every 14 years. Japan has never had one. Australia hasn't had one since they banned private gun ownership in 1996. It seems odd to me that if guns could 'limit' these things, we'd have many many more of them than the Europeans and Asians have.
Witnesses at the concert in Paris told their story of how these guys walked down the aisles totally fearless; like a farmer walking through his pig sty just killing randomly. There was no reason to duck, no reason to hide, because nobody there had the ability to defend themselves from an armed terrorist.
Yes, but oddly enough, the same could be said of Loughner or Lanza or Holmes or Cho, all of whom walked around killing people with no impediment either.
If guns made us safer, we'd have the lowest crime rates, not the highest.
We have 300 million guns in this country, and these mass shooting incidents are never stopped
Because much like our American mass murderers, they can't stand the thought of being locked up--especially for years. They want to kill as many people as possible and then kill themselves to avoid the torture of prison. Lord only knows what our American prisoners do to these guys if they ever get into our prison system.
yet you right wingers are pissing yourselves at the thought of closing Gitmo and putting them in the real prisons... Right wing logic never stops the Crazy.
An armed citizen or officer can wound a subject disabling him from suicide and limiting their kill count. That's the very last thing these maniacs want. As you pointed out, they do want to die and hook up with these ugly virgins. So they look for places where their mission can be completed to their satisfaction.
Right, guy. You know, here's the thing. We have 300 million guns in this country, and these mass shooting incidents are never stopped. We have one every couple of weeks. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has one about every 14 years. Japan has never had one. Australia hasn't had one since they banned private gun ownership in 1996. It seems odd to me that if guns could 'limit' these things, we'd have many many more of them than the Europeans and Asians have.
Witnesses at the concert in Paris told their story of how these guys walked down the aisles totally fearless; like a farmer walking through his pig sty just killing randomly. There was no reason to duck, no reason to hide, because nobody there had the ability to defend themselves from an armed terrorist.
Yes, but oddly enough, the same could be said of Loughner or Lanza or Holmes or Cho, all of whom walked around killing people with no impediment either.
If guns made us safer, we'd have the lowest crime rates, not the highest.
Because much like our American mass murderers, they can't stand the thought of being locked up--especially for years. They want to kill as many people as possible and then kill themselves to avoid the torture of prison. Lord only knows what our American prisoners do to these guys if they ever get into our prison system.
yet you right wingers are pissing yourselves at the thought of closing Gitmo and putting them in the real prisons... Right wing logic never stops the Crazy.
An armed citizen or officer can wound a subject disabling him from suicide and limiting their kill count. That's the very last thing these maniacs want. As you pointed out, they do want to die and hook up with these ugly virgins. So they look for places where their mission can be completed to their satisfaction.
Right, guy. You know, here's the thing. We have 300 million guns in this country, and these mass shooting incidents are never stopped. We have one every couple of weeks. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has one about every 14 years. Japan has never had one. Australia hasn't had one since they banned private gun ownership in 1996. It seems odd to me that if guns could 'limit' these things, we'd have many many more of them than the Europeans and Asians have.
Witnesses at the concert in Paris told their story of how these guys walked down the aisles totally fearless; like a farmer walking through his pig sty just killing randomly. There was no reason to duck, no reason to hide, because nobody there had the ability to defend themselves from an armed terrorist.
Yes, but oddly enough, the same could be said of Loughner or Lanza or Holmes or Cho, all of whom walked around killing people with no impediment either.
If guns made us safer, we'd have the lowest crime rates, not the highest.
Australia hasn't had one since they banned private gun ownership in 1996.
Fast and Furious tried to track a snowflake in a blizzard.
I love it when you twits say this....
You twits have used the law to make almost every public space a legally mandated gun free zone, barring all good gun owners from having a gun in the most likely places for mass shooters to strike......the very gun free zones you created.....
Wrong...they have had several and many others including the two recent ones where 2 different immigrants got guns and murdered people...and the only thing that stopped them from shooting up schools or theaters or concert halls..they just chose not to....Australian gun control did not stop them from being mass shooters....they just chose not to....
and gun ownership in Australia is up to the levels it was before the ban....and gun smuggling is big business in Australia and their gun crime rate is going up...after the confiscation....
Dipshit......each one of those guys went to a gun free zone...where you twits made sure no good guys would have guns to stop them......the Theater shooter chose the theater because it was gun free...
Guns don't make you free or compensate for your tiny dick. Hate to keep breaking that to you.
So guys with tiny dicks like yourself will want them, too.
Clearly, the gun industry knows about your insecurities and plays on them. A guy who has an avi of someone shooting a gun clearly has some "shortcomings" if you know what I mean.
but the gun lobby is just fine with terrorists getting guns, because all the Tiny Dicks will want them, too.
This isn't out of line, mostly because 'not being able to compensate for a tiny penis' isn't that big of a deal.
I'm sure that some Tiny Dick like yourself…
I know you think your penis compensator makes you superman…
Can't say the word "clip" around a guy who is compensating for a tiny pecker.)
Dipshit......each one of those guys went to a gun free zone...where you twits made sure no good guys would have guns to stop them......the Theater shooter chose the theater because it was gun free...
No, the Theater shooter picked the Theater because they were showing a Batman movie and he thought he was The Joker. That's why he didn't shoot it up when they were showing a Transformer Movie.
And even though this guy was so fucking crazy that he thought he was a psychotic clown from a comic book, he was still able to purchase a military grade rifle and a 100 round clip.
(and i know you guys hate it when I call them "clips" instead of magazine. Can't say the word "clip" around a guy who is compensating for a tiny pecker.)
Dipshit......each one of those guys went to a gun free zone...where you twits made sure no good guys would have guns to stop them......the Theater shooter chose the theater because it was gun free...
No, the Theater shooter picked the Theater because they were showing a Batman movie and he thought he was The Joker. That's why he didn't shoot it up when they were showing a Transformer Movie.
And even though this guy was so fucking crazy that he thought he was a psychotic clown from a comic book, he was still able to purchase a military grade rifle and a 100 round clip.
(and i know you guys hate it when I call them "clips" instead of magazine. Can't say the word "clip" around a guy who is compensating for a tiny pecker.)
Did you know TSA employes almost hundred people on said watchlist.....have a nice flight
Try it, see how easy it is.
sure it's easy. They resist...
See. Easy.
what part of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms," is NOT plain English?
Even in those days, you didn't need to belong to a militia to own arms.
In those days, people owned slaves, but slaves were not allowed to have guns. so clearly, it was meant in the context of a "militia', not every whackadoodle who could plop down $100 for a Saturday Night Special.
Back in those days, a musket had a fire rate of 1 shot per minute. Now we have fully automatic weapons and 100 round clips and apparently, if you are a guy who thinks you are the Joker, you can buy one and mow down a whole theater full of Batman fans.
So maybe instead of making laws based on what we THINK a bunch of slave-rapists who shit in chamberpots meant when they talked about a well regulated militia meaning people could have arms, we should think about what works well in the here and now.
2000 guys on the TERROR WATCH LIST being able to buy guns is not a good idea in 2015.
yes...Ted "the swimmer" kennedy was on the terror watch list.....our governemnt at work...and though his policies terrorized this country until is long over due death.....he was by no means a violent terrorist....
That's not even funny Joe.. The guy worked for the ARMY as a Chief Psychmeister. He was not on any lists and NOT considered a terrorist. Tho --- the "Soldier of Allah" on his biz card would have raised flags if the Fed Govt wasn't so inept about identifying POTENTIAL Islamic extremist threats.
I agree, it isn't funny. A guy like Nidal Hasan had no business being in the Army. He also had no business being able to buy a gun.
The difference is, the Army took steps to weed out the next potential Nidal Hasan. The Gun Industry, meh, not so much. Don't you dare talk about background checks!!!!
A guy like Nidal Hasan had no business being in the Army.
Why?
What in his record would have prevented him from serving?
Nidal Hasan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He didn't want to serve?
wahhhhhh
can you imagine how many would leave the service the first time they got a blister, if all they had to do was say they wanted out?
The rest of your post?
Pure comedy, as usual.
Actually, the man had been in for something like 21 years, had received a commission and several promotions.
And at some point, he went nuts, at which point someone should have stepped in and gotten him discharged.
Except, of course no one did. Because by 2004, people weren't signing up and they didn't want to lose the people they had. They were pulling back guys who had already served their time.
But from the Wiki, you have this..
Hasan was investigated by the FBI after intelligence agencies intercepted at least 18 e-mails between him and Anwar al-Awlaki between December 2008 and June 2009.[63] al-Awlaki was a major influence on radical English-speaking jihadis internationally, and contact with him by an American officer would naturally raise concerns.[64]
In one of the e-mails, Hasan wrote al-Awlaki: "I can't wait to join you" in the afterlife. Hasan also asked al-Awlaki when jihad is appropriate, and whether it is permissible if innocents are killed in a suicide attack.[65] In the months before the shooting, Hasan increased his contacts with al-Awlaki to discuss how to transfer funds abroad without coming to the attention of law authorities.
Yup. this guy is someone they totally needed to keep in AND let him buy a gun.
I hope that's not what you want.....There would be pussies to give up their right but then there would be some who would go down fighting...Lots of casualties what nobody wants...because locking people up is impratical and expensive.
Gun confiscation is easy.
