- Nov 2, 2017
- 16,281
- 9,336
...and Hawaii is not?We know why Alaska is on there. It is logistically a nightmare.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...and Hawaii is not?We know why Alaska is on there. It is logistically a nightmare.
Go ahead and demonstrate what conclusion of mine was "wrong". You're the partisan dope who said blue states poured money into investing in education while red states operated "on the cheap"When 9 of the top 10 states in quality of education are Blue States, it shows your conclusions are wrong
no problem ..i am here to help....i notice you did not answer my question about Garden Grove....thats ok not many would buy there....yea that is adorable...and i bet there are a hell of a lot Californians that agree with me...would you buy a house in garden grove for that kind of money?..and that market value is way out of line....old shitty houses in Garden Grove are going for 4-5 hundred thousand,and they are old houses built in the 60's in not so great neighborhoods....sure it was...you made it sound like the people of California dont mind paying for things that are overpriced,when thats a bunch of bullshit....even those who move in dont want to pay more for what is there already....
Obviously people don't want to pay more for something than they need to.
"Overpriced" meaning what exactly? I'm talking about market value. The market value of a home in California is higher than the market value of a home in Mississippi. People are willing to pay more for something they perceive to be more valuable.
We all gauge this decision. When deciding which car to buy, there's a wide range of selections. Someone can pay $x on a car or $y on a better car. The second car isn't "overpriced". But it's better than the first car so it costs more.
Oh. You think your opinion on what the market value should be is of importance.
That's adorable.
Things cost what people are willing to pay for them.
It's really not that difficult of a concept. But yes, your opinion on what the market value ought to be is soooooo helpful. Thank you so much for that.
Your ability to cherry pick a few outliers does little to refute the fact that Blue States have better educational systemsGo ahead and demonstrate what conclusion of mine was "wrong". You're the partisan dope who said blue states poured money into investing in education while red states operated "on the cheap"When 9 of the top 10 states in quality of education are Blue States, it shows your conclusions are wrong
This list shows your assumptions are wrong: That more money guarantees a great education (California proves it does not) and red states do not value education (Wyoming shows that's a lie).
How has that investment paid off in California, Oregon, New Mexico, Nevada, to name a few?
Wisconsin is now a red state and ranks 13th on the education list even though it spends the 24th most per pupil.
Your idiotic partisan talking point backfired. Who "educated" you?
California invested heavily in many of them things....education went from top 5 to bottom 10...??As in most things in life, you get what you pay for
Some states are willing to invest in education, healthcare, taking care of the poor, modern infrastructure, parks and recreation,
Other states operate on the cheap
There are fifty states. Not ten! Your trend does not hold up when ALL the states are looked at. You have taken a generalization and tried to make it applicable to ALL the states.Your ability to cherry pick a few outliers does little to refute the fact that Blue States have better educational systems
When nine of the top ten are Blue, it does show a trend
California has a unique demographic with a heavy immigrant population. They have an excuse for poor performance. What is the excuse of Mississippi or West Virginia?California invested heavily in many of them things....education went from top 5 to bottom 10...??As in most things in life, you get what you pay for
Some states are willing to invest in education, healthcare, taking care of the poor, modern infrastructure, parks and recreation,
Other states operate on the cheap
Never claimed absolute. Some Red States are able to maintain a respectable educational system. But the BEST are almost exclusively BlueThere are fifty states. Not ten! Your trend does not hold up when ALL the states are looked at. You have taken a generalization and tried to make it applicable to ALL the states.Your ability to cherry pick a few outliers does little to refute the fact that Blue States have better educational systems
When nine of the top ten are Blue, it does show a trend
Not very smart.
Bullshit! Post # 96 made no such distinctions. If you had said this originally you would have a point.Never claimed absolute. Some Red States are able to maintain a respectable educational system. But the BEST are almost exclusively Blue
California has had a "heavy' immigrant population even back in the 70's.....whats your next excuse RW?...California has a unique demographic with a heavy immigrant population. They have an excuse for poor performance. What is the excuse of Mississippi or West Virginia?California invested heavily in many of them things....education went from top 5 to bottom 10...??As in most things in life, you get what you pay for
Some states are willing to invest in education, healthcare, taking care of the poor, modern infrastructure, parks and recreation,
Other states operate on the cheap
Someone is fucking analBullshit! Post # 96 made no such distinctions. If you had said this originally you would have a point.Never claimed absolute. Some Red States are able to maintain a respectable educational system. But the BEST are almost exclusively Blue
But you didn't. And you don't.
California has had a "heavy' immigrant population even back in the 70's.....whats your next excuse RW?...California has a unique demographic with a heavy immigrant population. They have an excuse for poor performance. What is the excuse of Mississippi or West Virginia?California invested heavily in many of them things....education went from top 5 to bottom 10...??As in most things in life, you get what you pay for
Some states are willing to invest in education, healthcare, taking care of the poor, modern infrastructure, parks and recreation,
Other states operate on the cheap
were did you live?....California has had a "heavy' immigrant population even back in the 70's.....whats your next excuse RW?...California has a unique demographic with a heavy immigrant population. They have an excuse for poor performance. What is the excuse of Mississippi or West Virginia?California invested heavily in many of them things....education went from top 5 to bottom 10...??As in most things in life, you get what you pay for
Some states are willing to invest in education, healthcare, taking care of the poor, modern infrastructure, parks and recreation,
Other states operate on the cheap
I lived in California in the late 70s. The immigrant population was nowhere near what it is today
Because I hold you accountable for the drivel you post?Someone is fucking anal
Riverside then the northern Bay Areawere did you live?....California has had a "heavy' immigrant population even back in the 70's.....whats your next excuse RW?...California has a unique demographic with a heavy immigrant population. They have an excuse for poor performance. What is the excuse of Mississippi or West Virginia?California invested heavily in many of them things....education went from top 5 to bottom 10...??As in most things in life, you get what you pay for
Some states are willing to invest in education, healthcare, taking care of the poor, modern infrastructure, parks and recreation,
Other states operate on the cheap
I lived in California in the late 70s. The immigrant population was nowhere near what it is today
That deep blue states I used to live in and the one I currently live in, California and Oregon, are ranked 34th and 35th respectively in this listing.
Not very impressive especially considering all the money they pour into education and their very high tax rates.
There are fifty states. Not ten! Your trend does not hold up when ALL the states are looked at. You have taken a generalization and tried to make it applicable to ALL the states.
Not very smart.
in the 70's there were anywhere from 1-2 million illegals there....most in S.Cal in LA and San Bernardino Counties..that had an impact on the schools....yet they still did ok....why in the world Riverside?....Riverside then the northern Bay Areawere did you live?....California has had a "heavy' immigrant population even back in the 70's.....whats your next excuse RW?...California has a unique demographic with a heavy immigrant population. They have an excuse for poor performance. What is the excuse of Mississippi or West Virginia?California invested heavily in many of them things....education went from top 5 to bottom 10...??
I lived in California in the late 70s. The immigrant population was nowhere near what it is today
Because I hold you accountable for the drivel you post?Someone is fucking anal