2020 Ties for Hottest Year on Record, NASA Says (Nullfying 10,000 "it's cold this morning" posts here)

And what you believe is utter nonsense to me.....see how that works? I can promise you this much, I have come by my conclusion with a lot of painstaking reading and research. There isn't anything you and abu have regurgitated that I haven't read before....same buzzwords, same talking points followed up with a "Your stoopid if'n you don't believe in Gorebal Warming!" I will say those like yourself are pretty easy to spot. looks like we are at an impasse because I am never going to believe that there isn't more to this "crisis" than meets the eye.

History already has proven this to be the case.
It has not.

Have you looked at this: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM.pdf
 
Your stoopid if'n you don't believe in Gorebal Warming!"
Where did I ever say that ?
If I said anything it would be, “you’re ignorant if you deny the science of AGW”


“Ignorance“ aptly applies to the denial of AGW.
I would call flat “earthers” ignorant too.
 

The climate is changing but not for the reasons you believe. This spraying program using heavy metal nano-particultes like strontium, barium and aluminum has been going on in NATO countries since 1997 but the research and fine tuning has gone one since the 1940's. MIT came out with an article on Christmas Eve of last year claiming it would be a crime against humanity NOT to spray. Unfortunately it's not working out for us as it lands in our water and on the crops and it's acidifying the soil. Now Monsanto has a patent on GMO seeds that are drought resistant and will grow in aluminum corrupted soil.....hmmmmm?. Just because YOU can't comprehend it doesn't mean it's not happening. The water and soil samples do not lie.....



UNEP and the WMO both U.N programs and the IPCC works at the leisure of the U.N. I wouldn't trust colleges like John Hopkins because most of the tenured professors are either socialists or full blown commies. Ever read the Iron Mountain Report? What do you know about the formation of the Club Of Rome and their books like "Limits To Growth" and Sustainable Development. Have you ever looked into geo-engineering? Because if you haven't, you are only seeing part of the picture. We know what we see with our own eyes and the white-out conditions after spraying for a few hours. You are not helping your side with the temper-tantrum throwing and the condescending act. You believe that oil is a dead dinosaur and foliage matter and that lie was sold the the Geneva Convention in 1893 to use the phrase "fossil fuel" in an attempt to imply it could become scarce. What do you know about the Petro dollar and the story behind that? Hundreds of patents that could use every drop of gasoline while not emitting anything? seems those patents fall under the catch all of "National Security". This is all a big plan to move people into smaller homes, totally rid the country of rural communities called agenda 21 and ICLEI. You really should attack issues like these and seeking a connection as tomhow this was planned 60 years ago. There is much more for us look into than blindly following a few billionaires that are frothing at the mouth to start collecting carbon taxes on a resource they also sell us....I believe that is called "double-dipping".

Best of luck figuring it all out using your own powers of discernment instead of being led around by the nose
Dale Smith is a whackadoodle CHEMTRAILS ConspiracYst.
Always trying to work his obsession into a Science/Env/Climate, but it's the same old same old without the contrails Pix (but still "Spraying" so) as he used to pollute the section with.


`
 
Last edited:
Only a Denier IDIOT like you

uncle-buck-blasphemy.gif
 

Was Global Warming Data ‘Faked’ to ‘Fit Climate Change Fictions’?

That adjustments are made to records of climate is neither a scoop, nor a secret, nor a controversy.

  • Published 3 October 2019 - Snopes

Claim​

NASA and NOAA faked climate data in the GISTEMP global temperature record to exaggerate global warming.

Rating


False

False

Origin​

Since 2014, climate-change deniers have squeezed millions of views, Facebook shares, and Twitter retweets by retelling a story alleging the discovery of “faked” NASA data designed to “fit a climate change narrative.” Though copied almost wholesale from a blog post, the version of the story that has had the most online traction was published on the one-stop Conspiracy theory/supplement shop that goes by the name Natural News....
[..............]

[..............]

[..............]


`
Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
 
You mean every climatoligist that gets its funding from the IPCC who is funded by the U.N. ..and calling me stupid doesn't help your case. Until geoengineering is figured into the picture? What they have to say doesn't matter to me. It seems so important to you that I give a rip. You are in a very tough spot....you care while I don't care nor believe them.
Geesus, and so isn’t cancer research bozo at these same institutions that serve a dual purpose. So you don’t go to doctors for treatment either ?. You are taking a pretty ignorant point of view. I don’t believe you silly conspiracy theorists who make up shit. Go ahead, tell me you're smarter than literally, EVERY CLIMATE research facility in the world, our military and every related corporation. You’re a fool.
You think only the UN funds Climate research ? Are you that ignorant ? You’re in a tough spot. Being ignorant and a conspiracy theorist makes you a loser. Now, brag about how smart you are like Trump, who says he knows more than SCIENTISTS. Hilarious.
 
LOL!!!

Translation - Dag is PARROTING a "greater guru" than you, nevermind that guru cannot explain a map of the Arctic and will not defend the FUDGING of the atmospheric temp data showing NO WARMING despite rising Co2....



Cute And Sweet Parrot Pictures - 25dip
So, you can’t tell us right ?
Babble, babble babble.
1689946624842.jpeg
 
So, you can’t tell us right ?
Babble, babble babble.
View attachment 806577


Jeopardy! music still playing...

Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland while there are trees and moose north of Arctic Circle on Alaska....


LOL!!!


YOU claim your beaked birdbrain is parroting a GREATER "guru," who after stealing $20 trillion cannot explain a MAP of the Arctic...


MORON!!!
 
Jeopardy! music still playing...

Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland while there are trees and moose north of Arctic Circle on Alaska....


LOL!!!


YOU claim your beaked birdbrain is parroting a GREATER "guru," who after stealing $20 trillion cannot explain a MAP of the Arctic...


MORON!!!
Boy, you are stupid. It’s called snow ice dufus.
 
LOL!!!

Define the difference between "ice" and "snow ice."

Which does Hunter Biden snort???
Another dumbass. Ice is ice foolish. There are different types. Like a pretender like you would not know. Get off your ass and do some research.
 
LOL!!!

Translation - Dag is PARROTING a "greater guru" than you, nevermind that guru cannot explain a map of the Arctic and will not defend the FUDGING of the atmospheric temp data showing NO WARMING despite rising Co2....



Cute And Sweet Parrot Pictures - 25dip
Babble babble you turkey
1690223677757.jpeg
 
So no different than any other interglacial period. Except it's cooler by 2C.
 
So no different than any other interglacial period. Except it's cooler by 2C.
I am watching on Netflix a new docuseries on "life on our Planet". About 2 billion years ago, before the Earth had land animals, a great Ice Age happened where all the CO2 was gone, not able to trap the heat of the sun, so all the water that was shallow, froze over, and only the deep oceans were able to continue with life. So my question was, "Where did all the CO2 go"? Then when the CO2 came back, (No man was on Earth at the time) the ice melted and soon life came out of the sea. So where did the CO2 come back from? Not man, but a cycle of the Earth that keeps happening. So thanks to the docuseries, this proves the lies of the Marxists who wants to steal the wealth of America.
 
I am watching on Netflix a new docuseries on "life on our Planet". About 2 billion years ago, before the Earth had land animals, a great Ice Age happened where all the CO2 was gone, not able to trap the heat of the sun, so all the water that was shallow, froze over, and only the deep oceans were able to continue with life. So my question was, "Where did all the CO2 go"? Then when the CO2 came back, (No man was on Earth at the time) the ice melted and soon life came out of the sea. So where did the CO2 come back from? Not man, but a cycle of the Earth that keeps happening. So thanks to the docuseries, this proves the lies of the Marxists who wants to steal the wealth of America.
The ocean which is where ~95% of the CO2 resides in solution.

When it gets warmer the ocean releases CO2. When it gets colder the ocean absorbs CO2.
 
The ocean which is where ~95% of the CO2 resides in solution.

When it gets warmer the ocean releases CO2. When it gets colder the ocean absorbs CO2.
So how could the water release CO2 while it is frozen solid? 200,000 years that Ice Age lasted. Could the Sun have a part in it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top