Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It won't matter a damn. And it won't matter a damn if they take Congress either.We'll discuss three, when two is legal everywhere. With the SC "ruling" today, it's pretty damn close.
.
No, we'll discuss three...right now...on the eve of an election. I wonder how that will play out for republican seats in congress?
That we did, again and again, but she still won't believe us, what a shame.It won't play at all. Marriage equality has been made part of the Constitutional protections by SCOTUS. Nothing Sil can say changes that. Nothing she says about polygamy has anything to do with it.
Sil, we told you so.
You think that a republican Congress will replace Ginsberg with a liberal or conservative Justice? How about any of the others who will likely retire during the GOP congressional domination?Time to grow up little Sil. You've lost this war, pick another.
I thought you were against republicans taking the Senate this Fall? Seems weird to celebrate it...
There is no federal law banning gay marriage, or forcing states to support gay marriage. Thus, the SCOTUS has nothing to rule on other than each states individual laws banning said marriages.32 States Ask Supreme Court to Settle Gay Marriage - ABC News
yeah so 32 states on Thursday want Scotus to just settle the matter once and for all. Given the recent ruling for WI and IL we kinda already know where this will go if Scotus ever decides to deal with this. Watch them punt back to the lower courts.
Bull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
Bull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
Or if you want to argue that the 82% of posters here at USMB are all far right wingnutters that voted here, let's hear that too. Should be a real gem of a spin... Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings Page 153 US Message Board - Political Discussion ForumBull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
If you want to argue that the Right in this country didn't spend zillions fighting same sex marriage let's hear it.
Or if you want to argue that the 82% of posters here at USMB are all far right wingnutters that voted here, let's hear that too. Should be a real gem of a spin... Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings Page 153 US Message Board - Political Discussion ForumBull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
If you want to argue that the Right in this country didn't spend zillions fighting same sex marriage let's hear it.
[one of the largest responses to a poll here at USMB]
Or if you want to argue that the 82% of posters here at USMB are all far right wingnutters that voted here, let's hear that too. Should be a real gem of a spin... Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings Page 153 US Message Board - Political Discussion ForumBull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
If you want to argue that the Right in this country didn't spend zillions fighting same sex marriage let's hear it.
[one of the largest responses to a poll here at USMB]
Or if you want to argue that the 82% of posters here at USMB are all far right wingnutters that voted here, let's hear that too. Should be a real gem of a spin... Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings Page 153 US Message Board - Political Discussion ForumBull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
If you want to argue that the Right in this country didn't spend zillions fighting same sex marriage let's hear it.
[one of the largest responses to a poll here at USMB]
What kind of dullard assumes that the results of his inane thread poll actually represents "82% of posters here at USMB"?
I'm a member of the right and I did not spend a dime fighting same sex marriage. To the contrary I defended it. There are some on the right and left who fought same sex marriage. The leftists don't own gays cause they switched last election.Bull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
If you want to argue that the Right in this country didn't spend zillions fighting same sex marriage let's hear it.
I'm a member of the right and I did not spend a dime fighting same sex marriage.Bull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
If you want to argue that the Right in this country didn't spend zillions fighting same sex marriage let's hear it.
I'm a member of the right and I did not spend a dime fighting same sex marriage.Bull shit. Many conservatives are for it and many democrats are against it. Your broad brush stroke accusations are childish.The conservatives lost on this issue; the liberals won.
I'd be interested to know how much money the Right threw down the toilet opposing the right to same sex marriage,
not to mention, how much better that money might have been spent.
If you want to argue that the Right in this country didn't spend zillions fighting same sex marriage let's hear it.
I was referring to the money that was spent not the money that wasn't. Duh.
You think that a republican Congress will replace Ginsberg with a liberal or conservative Justice? How about any of the others who will likely retire during the GOP congressional domination?Time to grow up little Sil. You've lost this war, pick another.
That might make a wee bit of difference... Oh, and if polygamists start suing in California for the right to marry....today...
