4 Supreme Court Justices to fight democrat's voter fraud

The Supreme Court is going to get rid of Section 5 of the voting rights act. This will end decades of democrat voter fraud and help put honest conservatives in office instead of the corrupt democrats in control now. This will get our country back on its feet and kick the traiteros socialists out for good.

When John Roberts talks, Congress should listen - The Week

Typical, you accuse others of fraud to deflect attention from the fraud you support!

Republicans don't use voter fraud. Promising them more welfare gets the welfare leeches and illegal immigrants registered and to the polls to vote for the democrats as many times as possible is the fraud that democrats want to protect with section 5.

The GOP voters are the top leaches in the nation.
 
The Supreme Court is going to get rid of Section 5 of the voting rights act. This will end decades of democrat voter fraud and help put honest conservatives in office instead of the corrupt democrats in control now. This will get our country back on its feet and kick the traiteros socialists out for good.

When John Roberts talks, Congress should listen - The Week

Actually not.

It will merely make it easier for racists and partisan republicans to enact discriminatory voting regulations which will subsequently be challenged in court and struck down as un-Constitutional.
 
The Supreme Court is going to get rid of Section 5 of the voting rights act. This will end decades of democrat voter fraud and help put honest conservatives in office instead of the corrupt democrats in control now. This will get our country back on its feet and kick the traiteros socialists out for good.

When John Roberts talks, Congress should listen - The Week

Typical, you accuse others of fraud to deflect attention from the fraud you support!

Republicans don't use voter fraud. Promising them more welfare gets the welfare leeches and illegal immigrants registered and to the polls to vote for the democrats as many times as possible is the fraud that democrats want to protect with section 5.

The kind of voter fraud Section 5 deals with is a lot more serious than a few people voting twice. Check your history. You're standing up for some of the worst scum in this nation's history.
 
What I find really funny is Maobamas massive voter registration of minorities will have a great deal to do whith the undoing of section 5. How ironic is that?
 
The Supreme Court is going to get rid of Section 5 of the voting rights act. This will end decades of democrat voter fraud and help put honest conservatives in office instead of the corrupt democrats in control now. This will get our country back on its feet and kick the traiteros socialists out for good.

When John Roberts talks, Congress should listen - The Week

Typical, you accuse others of fraud to deflect attention from the fraud you support!

Republicans don't use voter fraud. Promising them more welfare gets the welfare leeches and illegal immigrants registered and to the polls to vote for the democrats as many times as possible is the fraud that democrats want to protect with section 5.

True, neither do democrats.

In fact no one does – it’s a non-issue, a myth, a failed attempt by conservatives to gain some perceived political advantage.

The analysis of 2,068 reported fraud cases by News21, a Carnegie-Knight investigative reporting project, found 10 cases of alleged in-person voter impersonation since 2000. With 146 million registered voters in the United States, those represent about one for every 15 million prospective voters.

REPORT: Voter Impersonation Fraud Virtually Non-Existent

The analysis found that there is more alleged fraud in absentee ballots and voter registration than in any of the other categories. The analysis shows 491 cases of alleged absentee ballot fraud and 400 cases involving registration fraud. Requiring voters to show identification at the polls — the crux of most of the new legislation — would not have prevented those cases.

Election Day impersonation, an impetus for voter ID laws, a rarity, data show - Washington Post
 
Republicans still think that allowing blacks to vote is voter fraud?
 
Typical, you accuse others of fraud to deflect attention from the fraud you support!

Republicans don't use voter fraud. Promising them more welfare gets the welfare leeches and illegal immigrants registered and to the polls to vote for the democrats as many times as possible is the fraud that democrats want to protect with section 5.

The GOP voters are the top leaches in the nation.
Wrong just like a typical stupid libtard.
 
Typical, you accuse others of fraud to deflect attention from the fraud you support!

Republicans don't use voter fraud. Promising them more welfare gets the welfare leeches and illegal immigrants registered and to the polls to vote for the democrats as many times as possible is the fraud that democrats want to protect with section 5.

The kind of voter fraud Section 5 deals with is a lot more serious than a few people voting twice. Check your history. You're standing up for some of the worst scum in this nation's history.
He is standing up for dimwits? I didn't know.
 
The Supreme Court is going to get rid of Section 5 of the voting rights act. This will end decades of democrat voter fraud and help put honest conservatives in office instead of the corrupt democrats in control now. This will get our country back on its feet and kick the traiteros socialists out for good.

When John Roberts talks, Congress should listen - The Week

So you're hoping the Supreme Court puts Republicans into office? How is that "democracy"?
 
The Supreme Court is going to get rid of Section 5 of the voting rights act. This will end decades of democrat voter fraud and help put honest conservatives in office instead of the corrupt democrats in control now. This will get our country back on its feet and kick the traiteros socialists out for good.

When John Roberts talks, Congress should listen - The Week

So you're hoping the Supreme Court puts Republicans into office? How is that "democracy"?
Beats what the idiot obamaturd is doing to democracy.
 
Republicans don't use voter fraud. Promising them more welfare gets the welfare leeches and illegal immigrants registered and to the polls to vote for the democrats as many times as possible is the fraud that democrats want to protect with section 5.

The kind of voter fraud Section 5 deals with is a lot more serious than a few people voting twice. Check your history. You're standing up for some of the worst scum in this nation's history.
He is standing up for dimwits? I didn't know.

What being stood up for is the dismantling of "Jim Crow". This happened within living memory, so take your revisionism elsewhere.
 
The kind of voter fraud Section 5 deals with is a lot more serious than a few people voting twice. Check your history. You're standing up for some of the worst scum in this nation's history.
He is standing up for dimwits? I didn't know.

What being stood up for is the dismantling of "Jim Crow". This happened within living memory, so take your revisionism elsewhere.

The court says that has been done and the congress or the AG hasn't provided any proof otherwise. The law is obsolete and based on the questions of the court it will be found unconstitutional on that basis.
 
He is standing up for dimwits? I didn't know.

What being stood up for is the dismantling of "Jim Crow". This happened within living memory, so take your revisionism elsewhere.

The court says that has been done and the congress or the AG hasn't provided any proof otherwise. The law is obsolete and based on the questions of the court it will be found unconstitutional on that basis.

I doubt that. You're living a pipe dream. Like I said "living memory". You're going to have to wait for a lot of us to die first and I hope to stay around at least another twenty years. You don't think the people that fought to dismantle the way things were are going to lay down and watch their work get reversed, do you? If you do, I've got bridge to sell you.
 
The Supreme Court is going to get rid of Section 5 of the voting rights act. This will end decades of democrat voter fraud and help put honest conservatives in office instead of the corrupt democrats in control now. This will get our country back on its feet and kick the traiteros socialists out for good.

When John Roberts talks, Congress should listen - The Week

So you're hoping the Supreme Court puts Republicans into office? How is that "democracy"?

Getting rid of the left wing voter fraud will make the conservative voters heard and this will give the country back the conservative government it needs and deserves.
 
Getting rid of the left wing voter fraud will make the conservative voters heard and this will give the country back the conservative government it needs and deserves.


Exactly, supressing the votes of democrats will allow the republicans to win, since in a perfect election they could only get about 44% of the vote.
 
Getting rid of the left wing voter fraud will make the conservative voters heard and this will give the country back the conservative government it needs and deserves.


Exactly, supressing the votes of democrats will allow the republicans to win, since in a perfect election they could only get about 44% of the vote.

Without voter fraud by the left and the lies of the liberals media conservative candidates win hands down. The American people are conservative by nature. This proves voter fraud by the liberals.
 
Getting rid of the left wing voter fraud will make the conservative voters heard and this will give the country back the conservative government it needs and deserves.


Exactly, supressing the votes of democrats will allow the republicans to win, since in a perfect election they could only get about 44% of the vote.

Without voter fraud by the left and the lies of the liberals media conservative candidates win hands down. The American people are conservative by nature. This proves voter fraud by the liberals.

Actually Americans are centrist. They are swayed a little from one side to the other, just like a pendulum. The pendulum is now starting to swing left.
 
What being stood up for is the dismantling of "Jim Crow". This happened within living memory, so take your revisionism elsewhere.

The court says that has been done and the congress or the AG hasn't provided any proof otherwise. The law is obsolete and based on the questions of the court it will be found unconstitutional on that basis.

I doubt that. You're living a pipe dream. Like I said "living memory". You're going to have to wait for a lot of us to die first and I hope to stay around at least another twenty years. You don't think the people that fought to dismantle the way things were are going to lay down and watch their work get reversed, do you? If you do, I've got bridge to sell you.

Reversed, hardly the law is based on 35 year old stats. and the points Mr. Roberts made reflected that the circumstances that existed then don't exist now. Eliminating section 5 will not reverse anything that currently exist and if some area should try to revert to their old ways there are remedies available under other law. The article showed where the court basically put congress on notice in 2009 that some changes needed to be made to the law and they didn't do it, so if it's struck down you only have congress to blame.
 

Forum List

Back
Top