400 Americans

[JoeNormal]

I think it's great that you and Rabbi can excuse any level of immorality by wrapping it in the veil of capitalism and then raising capitalism to the state of a law of nature which cannot be violated. I'll bet that makes moral decisions really simple, just the way you like 'em.

Until recently Americans have enjoyed an increasingly higher standard of living. That's dropped off and you liberal socialist idiots think capitalism is at fault. Or Reagan. Or Bush, or anything but an honest assessment of the situation. Hurting business doesn't help economies, it illogical. Economies don't sprout up through government soil, it comes from productivity.

Big businesses do better today because they have merged and gone global, averaging in those numbers with worker salaries misses the point, probably on purpose. Capitalism is what made this country great and for some bizarre reasons liberals think destroying it will improve the economy.

No, not the average liberal, they are too dim witted to understand, they simply repeat what they see from leftist sources, but those pulling the strings know exactly what they are doing and useful idiots have never been more receptive.

You said it yourself but are apparently too stupid to realize it. Productivity has increased something like 3 fold since the 70's yet the average wage has stagnated. Not the top wage though, that's skyrocketed. Could that have something to do with the top wage earners diverting that productivity increase into their own hands? I'm sure that point will be lost on you as well.

Top earners who are employees lack the ability to do that as their compensation is set by others.
Try again.

It's a big fucking boys club you pinhead. A giant game of I'll scratch your back if you'll scratch mine. Have you ever worked in a large corporation?

 

[Dot Com]

Dude, you dont have the slightest fucking clue what you aer talking about. Not a shred. Why should someone take you seriously?

Coming from the guy who said Perry was going to win the last Repub Primary BEFORE there was a single debate. You crack me up son

 

[JoeNormal]

I think it's great that you and Rabbi can excuse any level of immorality by wrapping it in the veil of capitalism and then raising capitalism to the state of a law of nature which cannot be violated. I'll bet that makes moral decisions really simple, just the way you like 'em.

Joe, you are a raging paranoiac with fantasies of conspiracy. Why would anyone take your comments seriously?

You're a sociopath. Of course being a sociopath, you won't see anything wrong with that.

You know this because?
Oh yeah, you dont. It just sounds good so you say it.

The signs are there for all to see. I would be interested in knowing where you draw the line - or if there's even a line to be drawn. Hiring a hit man conforms to the rules of capitalism. There's demand and there's someone to meet that demand with supply. Do you find anything wrong with that type of transaction?

You're kidding, right?

No, answer the question.

 

[The Rabbi]

Joe, you are a raging paranoiac with fantasies of conspiracy. Why would anyone take your comments seriously?

You're a sociopath. Of course being a sociopath, you won't see anything wrong with that.

You know this because?
Oh yeah, you dont. It just sounds good so you say it.

The signs are there for all to see. I would be interested in knowing where you draw the line - or if there's even a line to be drawn. Hiring a hit man conforms to the rules of capitalism. There's demand and there's someone to meet that demand with supply. Do you find anything wrong with that type of transaction?

You're kidding, right?

No, answer the question.

It's a clown question, bro.

 

[The Rabbi]

I think it's great that you and Rabbi can excuse any level of immorality by wrapping it in the veil of capitalism and then raising capitalism to the state of a law of nature which cannot be violated. I'll bet that makes moral decisions really simple, just the way you like 'em.

Until recently Americans have enjoyed an increasingly higher standard of living. That's dropped off and you liberal socialist idiots think capitalism is at fault. Or Reagan. Or Bush, or anything but an honest assessment of the situation. Hurting business doesn't help economies, it illogical. Economies don't sprout up through government soil, it comes from productivity.

Big businesses do better today because they have merged and gone global, averaging in those numbers with worker salaries misses the point, probably on purpose. Capitalism is what made this country great and for some bizarre reasons liberals think destroying it will improve the economy.

No, not the average liberal, they are too dim witted to understand, they simply repeat what they see from leftist sources, but those pulling the strings know exactly what they are doing and useful idiots have never been more receptive.

You said it yourself but are apparently too stupid to realize it. Productivity has increased something like 3 fold since the 70's yet the average wage has stagnated. Not the top wage though, that's skyrocketed. Could that have something to do with the top wage earners diverting that productivity increase into their own hands? I'm sure that point will be lost on you as well.

Top earners who are employees lack the ability to do that as their compensation is set by others.
Try again.

It's a big fucking boys club you pinhead. A giant game of I'll scratch your back if you'll scratch mine. Have you ever worked in a large corporation?

It's a CONSPIRACY!!

 

[JoeNormal]

You're a sociopath. Of course being a sociopath, you won't see anything wrong with that.

You know this because?
Oh yeah, you dont. It just sounds good so you say it.

The signs are there for all to see. I would be interested in knowing where you draw the line - or if there's even a line to be drawn. Hiring a hit man conforms to the rules of capitalism. There's demand and there's someone to meet that demand with supply. Do you find anything wrong with that type of transaction?

You're kidding, right?

No, answer the question.

It's a clown question, bro.

You don't want to answer because that would demand that you place some limits on capitalistic transactions. And that would violate your religion.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Agricultural communes not capitalism ! Lol

 

[Dot Com]

You know this because?
Oh yeah, you dont. It just sounds good so you say it.

The signs are there for all to see. I would be interested in knowing where you draw the line - or if there's even a line to be drawn. Hiring a hit man conforms to the rules of capitalism. There's demand and there's someone to meet that demand with supply. Do you find anything wrong with that type of transaction?

You're kidding, right?

No, answer the question.

It's a clown question, bro.

You don't want to answer because that would demand that you place some limits on capitalistic transactions. And that would violate your religion.

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that the Rabbi is a "supply-sider" They all are. The rw hive mind won't allow deviation

 

[Skull Pilot]

Define "fair share"....
Have fun twisting in the wind

"Fair Share stands for an America where everyone gets their fair share, does their fair share, and pays their fair share; and where everyone plays by the same rules."
SQUEAL more, Moron.
You're funny.

Fair Share

Not a definition of the term.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

The poor and illiterate create jobs and growth ....

Wealth tricles up !!! Lol

 

[The Rabbi]

You know this because?
Oh yeah, you dont. It just sounds good so you say it.

The signs are there for all to see. I would be interested in knowing where you draw the line - or if there's even a line to be drawn. Hiring a hit man conforms to the rules of capitalism. There's demand and there's someone to meet that demand with supply. Do you find anything wrong with that type of transaction?

You're kidding, right?

No, answer the question.

It's a clown question, bro.

You don't want to answer because that would demand that you place some limits on capitalistic transactions. And that would violate your religion.

I dont want to answer because it's a stupid question not worth answering. The answer should be obvious. Unless youre a psycho.

 

[JoeNormal]

The signs are there for all to see. I would be interested in knowing where you draw the line - or if there's even a line to be drawn. Hiring a hit man conforms to the rules of capitalism. There's demand and there's someone to meet that demand with supply. Do you find anything wrong with that type of transaction?

You're kidding, right?

No, answer the question.

It's a clown question, bro.

You don't want to answer because that would demand that you place some limits on capitalistic transactions. And that would violate your religion.

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that the Rabbi is a "supply-sider" They all are. The rw hive mind won't allow deviation

LOL, hive mind is right. I' was trying to give Rabbi the benefit of the doubt by considering him an actual capitalist who just hadn't considered the implications of his faith. You might be right about the 'supply-sider' thing though.

 

[The Rabbi]

The signs are there for all to see. I would be interested in knowing where you draw the line - or if there's even a line to be drawn. Hiring a hit man conforms to the rules of capitalism. There's demand and there's someone to meet that demand with supply. Do you find anything wrong with that type of transaction?

You're kidding, right?

No, answer the question.

It's a clown question, bro.

You don't want to answer because that would demand that you place some limits on capitalistic transactions. And that would violate your religion.

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that the Rabbi is a "supply-sider" They all are. The rw hive mind won't allow deviation

Every time you go out on a limb you fall on your head.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Facts are inconvenient things, so they just ignore them.

Are you ignoring this fact?

The wedges between productivity and median compensation growth Economic Policy Institute

Simply explained by the fact that technological advances have allowed less skilled laborers to produce more.

You cannot think that a guy who runs an automatized machine is worth the same as a skilled craftsman who can make by hand what the machine makes

 

[JoeNormal]

The signs are there for all to see. I would be interested in knowing where you draw the line - or if there's even a line to be drawn. Hiring a hit man conforms to the rules of capitalism. There's demand and there's someone to meet that demand with supply. Do you find anything wrong with that type of transaction?

You're kidding, right?

No, answer the question.

It's a clown question, bro.

You don't want to answer because that would demand that you place some limits on capitalistic transactions. And that would violate your religion.

I dont want to answer because it's a stupid question not worth answering. The answer should be obvious. Unless youre a psycho.

So I guess that either means that you do accept that there should be limits to capitalism or that you really are a psycho.

 

[The Rabbi]

Facts are inconvenient things, so they just ignore them.

Are you ignoring this fact?

The wedges between productivity and median compensation growth Economic Policy Institute

Simply explained by the fact that technological advances have allowed less skilled laborers to produce more.

You cannot think that a guy who runs an automatized machine is worth the same as a skilled craftsman who can make by hand what the machine makes

He might be.
The issue is unit labor cost. The skilled craftsman might be able to make only 5 widgets a day while the machine operator can crank out 1000. If they're comparable then the machine operator might be worth more money.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Facts are inconvenient things, so they just ignore them.

Are you ignoring this fact?

The wedges between productivity and median compensation growth Economic Policy Institute

Simply explained by the fact that technological advances have allowed less skilled laborers to produce more.

You cannot think that a guy who runs an automatized machine is worth the same as a skilled craftsman who can make by hand what the machine makes

He might be.
The issue is unit labor cost. The skilled craftsman might be able to make only 5 widgets a day while the machine operator can crank out 1000. If they're comparable then the machine operator might be worth more money.

No the guys who make, program and keep the machine running are more important than the moron pushing a button.

 

[Dot Com]

Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.


Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?

Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?

its the way Republican Jesus The Rabbi koshergrl CrusaderFrank Jeremiah wants it

 

[BluesLegend]

Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.


Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?

Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?

Hey Mr. Obama why has your administration passed thousands of jobs killing regulations? OH SNAP!

 

[Iceweasel]

I think it's great that you and Rabbi can excuse any level of immorality by wrapping it in the veil of capitalism and then raising capitalism to the state of a law of nature which cannot be violated. I'll bet that makes moral decisions really simple, just the way you like 'em.

Until recently Americans have enjoyed an increasingly higher standard of living. That's dropped off and you liberal socialist idiots think capitalism is at fault. Or Reagan. Or Bush, or anything but an honest assessment of the situation. Hurting business doesn't help economies, it illogical. Economies don't sprout up through government soil, it comes from productivity.

Big businesses do better today because they have merged and gone global, averaging in those numbers with worker salaries misses the point, probably on purpose. Capitalism is what made this country great and for some bizarre reasons liberals think destroying it will improve the economy.

No, not the average liberal, they are too dim witted to understand, they simply repeat what they see from leftist sources, but those pulling the strings know exactly what they are doing and useful idiots have never been more receptive.

You said it yourself but are apparently too stupid to realize it. Productivity has increased something like 3 fold since the 70's yet the average wage has stagnated. Not the top wage though, that's skyrocketed. Could that have something to do with the top wage earners diverting that productivity increase into their own hands? I'm sure that point will be lost on you as well.

You missed what I said so the stupid is all yours. Corporations are much larger today for the reasons mentioned and they can't take money away from anyone, only government can do that. Wages go up with the economy and right now there are more people looking for work than there is work. Competition for workers isn't playing much of a role in today's market and they aren't going to create work for the sake of hiring more bodies.