Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Now see, in the ,mind of the socialist progressive, you took away those people's jobs. You expected far too much and of course did not pay them enough. Even though they were not filling the needs of your business, you should have let them keep "their jobs."You got yours, right Rockefeller?All your Marxist rhetoric adds up to nothing. If you care about your job and work at it, success and money in this country are as easy as falling off a log.
"'Après moi le déluge! is the watchword of every capitalist and of every capitalist nation. Hence Capital is reckless of the health or length of life of the labourer, unless under compulsion from society,' wrote Karl Marx in Capital (Vol. 1, Part III, Chapter Ten, Section 5). What Marx said in the late nineteenth century still holds true today."
Critical Montages Apr s moi le d luge
Yes, comrade, I got mine. I also have a lot of people who work for me at the company I own and they get theirs too. Hard work is rewarded. I've also shit canned a bunch of losers who aren't getting theirs. See the common denominator in that? Why does the word Marxist bother you so much again, Karl?
Your side said it first..Look what happened...
Most people are stupid so who cares what most people believe?
Why don't the Hard Right just say that when campaigning... It would make voting so much easier...
To whom are you responding?You, your family and friend keep getting screwed and love it, dupes.
RWers duh. Change the channel.
Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.
Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?
Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?
Wait just a minute....You people are bitching and moaning about the wealthy being too wealthy. Now you've come up for air and now you're playing the "Obama the greatest job creator in history" card.OK so instead of having onerous regulations and some kind of tax relief we'll have onerous regulations AND confiscatory taxes. Brilliant!Erm, so the 400 wealthiest Americans can't create more jobs because Obama extended their tax cuts? Well, then, let's cut out that tax break altogether and see if they can create more jobs that way.Kinda hard to do it with all the regs obutthurt has put on small businesses.Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.
Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?
Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?
You understand the Bush tax cuts expired, right? And growth still sucks and the middle class still has stagnating income. Why would you want to replicate failure?
3.9% GDP is not bad. Better than at just about any time during the Bush administration.
Which is it?
See if you can spot a trend:
The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.
Over the past 60 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg image
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez The White House
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis BEA
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = FRB Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--September 18 2014
5/6 = Wealth And Inequality In America - Business Insider
Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts
Wait just a minute....You people are bitching and moaning about the wealthy being too wealthy. Now you've come up for air and now you're playing the "Obama the greatest job creator in history" card.OK so instead of having onerous regulations and some kind of tax relief we'll have onerous regulations AND confiscatory taxes. Brilliant!Erm, so the 400 wealthiest Americans can't create more jobs because Obama extended their tax cuts? Well, then, let's cut out that tax break altogether and see if they can create more jobs that way.Kinda hard to do it with all the regs obutthurt has put on small businesses.
You understand the Bush tax cuts expired, right? And growth still sucks and the middle class still has stagnating income. Why would you want to replicate failure?
3.9% GDP is not bad. Better than at just about any time during the Bush administration.
Which is it?
The Buffet family is one of the wealthiest families in the country, and yet they can't pay their people a living wage. You tell me why that is.
Wait just a minute....You people are bitching and moaning about the wealthy being too wealthy. Now you've come up for air and now you're playing the "Obama the greatest job creator in history" card.OK so instead of having onerous regulations and some kind of tax relief we'll have onerous regulations AND confiscatory taxes. Brilliant!Erm, so the 400 wealthiest Americans can't create more jobs because Obama extended their tax cuts? Well, then, let's cut out that tax break altogether and see if they can create more jobs that way.
You understand the Bush tax cuts expired, right? And growth still sucks and the middle class still has stagnating income. Why would you want to replicate failure?
3.9% GDP is not bad. Better than at just about any time during the Bush administration.
Which is it?
The Buffet family is one of the wealthiest families in the country, and yet they can't pay their people a living wage. You tell me why that is.
Sure - if you can tell me what a 'living wage' is, I'll be happy to tell you all about it.
"Fair Share stands for an America where everyone gets their fair share, does their fair share, and pays their fair share; and where everyone plays by the same rules."Define "fair share"....
Have fun twisting in the wind
By the means of bribing politicians of both parties for favorable tax and trade policies. Do you imagine the richest 0.1% of Americans amassed 36% of all gains in income between 1979-2007 because of their educational CHOICES or because they bribed politicians to ensure they would receive an ever increasing share of national income going to capital income rather than labor income.Government redistributed? How so? BY what means was this redistribution accomplished?
Non sequiturNon responsive.
Shytty Reaganist policy jobs, functional moron chump of the greedy idiot rich GOP..How bout some INVESTMENT in Americans, cheaper college /training loans, infrastructure jobs, dingbat dupes?Wait just a minute....You people are bitching and moaning about the wealthy being too wealthy. Now you've come up for air and now you're playing the "Obama the greatest job creator in hShytty Reaganist pistory" card.
Which is it?
Since you cant define it how do you know it didnt work?I would also be interested in hearing why the rw Horse & Sparrow..... errr.....Trickle Down theory hasn't worked.Have more wealth than half the population of the United States.
Hey Mr. Reagan, when exactly is this trickle down thing going to kick in?
Hey Mr. Bush, since the "job creators" still have the Tax Cut you gave them in 2002 and 2004, why aren't they, you know, creating more jobs?
Who is the Buffet family? Are they the people who own all those buffets? Of course they dont pay much. How much skill does it take to manage a buffet? Hell, you dont even need waiters.Wait just a minute....You people are bitching and moaning about the wealthy being too wealthy. Now you've come up for air and now you're playing the "Obama the greatest job creator in history" card.OK so instead of having onerous regulations and some kind of tax relief we'll have onerous regulations AND confiscatory taxes. Brilliant!Erm, so the 400 wealthiest Americans can't create more jobs because Obama extended their tax cuts? Well, then, let's cut out that tax break altogether and see if they can create more jobs that way.Kinda hard to do it with all the regs obutthurt has put on small businesses.
You understand the Bush tax cuts expired, right? And growth still sucks and the middle class still has stagnating income. Why would you want to replicate failure?
3.9% GDP is not bad. Better than at just about any time during the Bush administration.
Which is it?
The Buffet family is one of the wealthiest families in the country, and yet they can't pay their people a living wage. You tell me why that is.
Are you ignoring this fact?Facts are inconvenient things, so they just ignore them.
