5 big problems with Texas' bid to overturn Biden's win at the Supreme Court

What Texas Republicans are asking SCOTUS to rule.

1. That states have a right to sue other states over how they conduct elections.

2. That voting by absentee ballot is unconstitutional

3. That the remedy for changing absentee rules is to disallow the votes of those who followed those rules.

4. That the ruling will be limited only to states that Trump lost, not states like Texas and Florida who also changed their rules.
Charlie Dent just said if they can do that Democrats can file the same suit on states Trump won!

They can but the swing states are the states that have broken their own laws. This election is fraudulent and the illegitimate pervert will not be recognized.
So did Texas and Florida

Will Trump give those up?

Texas and Florida broke now laws according to their state legislatures. Next.

Post a link to a reliable source or go fuck yourself, lazy ass.
 
Sorry, idiot.....You are wrong.
It's the tenth of December, idiot! The Supreme Court today is receiving the replies they directed the
Gang of Four to make on Tuesday and Wednesday.

They not only are not NOT taking this case they are in the middle of hearing on it.
Grow a brain stem.
 
What Texas Republicans are asking SCOTUS to rule.

1. That states have a right to sue other states over how they conduct elections.

2. That voting by absentee ballot is unconstitutional

3. That the remedy for changing absentee rules is to disallow the votes of those who followed those rules.

4. That the ruling will be limited only to states that Trump lost, not states like Texas and Florida who also changed their rules.
Charlie Dent just said if they can do that Democrats can file the same suit on states Trump won!

They can but the swing states are the states that have broken their own laws. This election is fraudulent and the illegitimate pervert will not be recognized.


WANNA BET
MAGA
 
It's fantastic that other states in the union are challenging the corruption in these Dem blue states that's a whopper of a SCOTUS case right there. Something the SCOTUS is likely to want to get in the middle of. Dems are shitting their pants.

No way the Supreme Court wants to sully its reputation with silly Trump legal claims

18 state's AG's have joined the suit. Fly over country just kneed Dems in the groin.
Fly over country just placed partisan politics over the country.
 
Every attempt to promote it as unfair has been shot down by the legal system. However,
the fascists that are "tRUMPesters" want to have it their way.


"Calling an election unfair does not make it so," one ruling said.
And calling it fair when everyone sees it isn't does not make it fair.

They're supporting an autocrat wanna-be dictator and they are too stupid to see it.

Bullshit, they see it. They just don't care, they are in love.

MAGA
 
Never waste a good "Constitutional Crisis".
IMHO we all know that Justice Roberts is a closet democrat and a card-carrying Never-Trumper.
But it would be glorius to see Senator Cruz present arguments for Trump before the USSC, Ted's "populist" GOP creds would be golden for 2024 and beyond.
Here is Ted presenting arguments.

 
It's fantastic that other states in the union are challenging the corruption in these Dem blue states that's a whopper of a SCOTUS case right there. Something the SCOTUS is likely to want to get in the middle of. Dems are shitting their pants.

No way the Supreme Court wants to sully its reputation with silly Trump legal claims

18 state's AG's have joined the suit. Fly over country just kneed Dems in the groin.

In your wet dreams.

Here's the problem, right on page one:

"No. 22O155,
Original In theSupreme Court of the United States
STATE OF TEXAS,Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN,A ND STATE OF WISCONSIN, Defendants.
On Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint"""


As I quoted from a U of Texas law professor on another thread, "Leave to File" means that there's no other forum in which these issues can be resolved. As in no other venues or courts.

The suit has already been filed in 51 FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS.


So it's a failure from the start.

Got it, idiot????

I don't think the Supreme Court knows that. They've already taken the case on.
The Gang of Four has already been been directed by the court to respond to the Texas suit.
Their reply is due today. Got it, idiot????
The Supreme Court has not taken the case on, nor will they.
This case will receive the attention it deserves
None
 
Am I the only one here who realizes he's not qualified to be on the Supreme Court?
 
It's fantastic that other states in the union are challenging the corruption in these Dem blue states that's a whopper of a SCOTUS case right there. Something the SCOTUS is likely to want to get in the middle of. Dems are shitting their pants.

No way the Supreme Court wants to sully its reputation with silly Trump legal claims

18 state's AG's have joined the suit. Fly over country just kneed Dems in the groin.

In your wet dreams.

Here's the problem, right on page one:

"No. 22O155,
Original In theSupreme Court of the United States
STATE OF TEXAS,Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN,A ND STATE OF WISCONSIN, Defendants.
On Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint"""


As I quoted from a U of Texas law professor on another thread, "Leave to File" means that there's no other forum in which these issues can be resolved. As in no other venues or courts.

The suit has already been filed in 51 FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS.


So it's a failure from the start.

Got it, idiot????

I don't think the Supreme Court knows that. They've already taken the case on.
The Gang of Four has already been been directed by the court to respond to the Texas suit.
Their reply is due today. Got it, idiot????
"The Gang of Four"....:heehee:
 
Every attempt to promote it as unfair has been shot down by the legal system. However,
the fascists that are "tRUMPesters" want to have it their way.


"Calling an election unfair does not make it so," one ruling said.
And calling it fair when everyone sees it isn't does not make it fair.

They're supporting an autocrat wanna-be dictator and they are too stupid to see it.
I know you're emotionally disturbed, but why can't you wait a day or two and see what happens?
 
Texas's effort to get this Court to pick the next President has no basis in law or fact. The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and unmistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated," wrote Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro.

 
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel addressed the lawsuit with equally strong language, writing that "the election in Michigan is over. Texas comes as a stranger to this matter and should not be heard here."

The challenge here is an unprecedented one, without factual foundation or a valid legal basis," Michigan's brief said.
 
Chris Carr, the attorney general of Georgia, put more emphasis on the federalism implications of Texas' lawsuit in his filing. "Texas presses a generalized grievance that does not involve the sort of direct state-against-state controversy required for original jurisdiction," he wrote.
"And in any case, there is another forum in which parties who (unlike Texas) have standing can challenge Georgia's compliance with its own election laws: Georgia's own courts."
 
It's fantastic that other states in the union are challenging the corruption in these Dem blue states that's a whopper of a SCOTUS case right there. Something the SCOTUS is likely to want to get in the middle of. Dems are shitting their pants.

No way the Supreme Court wants to sully its reputation with silly Trump legal claims

18 state's AG's have joined the suit. Fly over country just kneed Dems in the groin.
Fly over country just placed partisan politics over the country.

Look who's talking you people voted for Joe Biden.
 

Forum List

Back
Top