60th Anniversary of Stalin - A Reminder

You are wrong, Konrad. The consensus is Snopes is a liberal left propaganda machine for Obama. Republicans are well aware of many instances when Snopes has claimed something not true that was later proven true. They still refused to correct it. They have no credibility. I'm not the only one who feels this way. Not by far. - Jeremiah

Snopes has been around 20+ years. They started out as an urban myth outfit and branched out into other topics. The fact that you label them as an Obama propaganda machine just underscores you lack of knowledge and bias towards anyone that doesn't toe your particular line of political correctness.
 
Jeremiah, you posted the following racist claptrap redbaiting bullshit in post 5 of your thread. Do NOT have a nice evening, but perhaps God will see fit to grant you grace, as while she/he seems fickle, he/she works in mysterious ways.

You must realise that to the Communist the end justifies the means. Stealing an election means nothing. Obamas cousin, Odinga, stole his own election and murdered many innocents - they were burned alive - in order to obtain it.
 
Snopes has been around 20+ years.

Snopes is a husband and wife team of David and Barbara Mikkelson, who promote "progressive" views. Canadians, the Mikkelson's don't vote in U.S. elections


They started out as an urban myth outfit and branched out into other topics. The fact that you label them as an Obama propaganda machine just underscores you lack of knowledge and bias towards anyone that doesn't toe your particular line of political correctness.

Snopes addresses right wing rumors and myths, of which there are many. Snopes generally fails to address similar left wings urban legends.

Like Wikipedia, Snopes can be useful at times. But the reliability of Snopes is low due to the bias.

The New York Times and MSNBC both demand that Snopes has no bias. Of course they both claim Stalin was a great guy and Pol Pot was merely "misunderstood..."
 
Snopes has been around 20+ years.

Snopes is a husband and wife team of David and Barbara Mikkelson, who promote "progressive" views. Canadians, the Mikkelson's don't vote in U.S. elections


They started out as an urban myth outfit and branched out into other topics. The fact that you label them as an Obama propaganda machine just underscores you lack of knowledge and bias towards anyone that doesn't toe your particular line of political correctness.

Snopes addresses right wing rumors and myths, of which there are many. Snopes generally fails to address similar left wings urban legends.

Like Wikipedia, Snopes can be useful at times. But the reliability of Snopes is low due to the bias.

The New York Times and MSNBC both demand that Snopes has no bias. Of course they both claim Stalin was a great guy and Pol Pot was merely "misunderstood..."

thank you for that.. I have a busy schedule and don't have time to educate this guy on Snopes... its unbelievable how little people fact check the fact checkers, isn't it?? - J.
 
Anniversary of what? What date or event?

And you're spouting an urban myth

snopes.com: Barack Obama and Kenya Connection

Uh, he was talking about Josef Stalin, not Obama.

But I can understand how you got mixed up.

I find it amusing that communists do not know the anniversary of their own heroes, etc. Too funny. Huffpost woke up this afternoon with an article. The BBC article was out long before anything from USA. Typical.
 
Snopes has been around 20+ years.

Snopes is a husband and wife team of David and Barbara Mikkelson, who promote "progressive" views. Canadians, the Mikkelson's don't vote in U.S. elections


They started out as an urban myth outfit and branched out into other topics. The fact that you label them as an Obama propaganda machine just underscores you lack of knowledge and bias towards anyone that doesn't toe your particular line of political correctness.

Snopes addresses right wing rumors and myths, of which there are many. Snopes generally fails to address similar left wings urban legends.

Like Wikipedia, Snopes can be useful at times. But the reliability of Snopes is low due to the bias.

The New York Times and MSNBC both demand that Snopes has no bias. Of course they both claim Stalin was a great guy and Pol Pot was merely "misunderstood..."

I know very few people who trust Snopes these days. Amazing the Conrads of the world haven't heard about this. Where do these people live? In a cave?
 
Creating another urban myth?!?! :cool:

No. That is what communists love to claim but lets cut to the chase and get the truth to the american people anyhow, alright? Read this and see if it awakens a brain cell or too in that progressive - communist mind of yours. - Jeremiah

UVORKUTA, Russia -- Anna Krikun can barely read the yellowing papers that show she was sentenced as a young woman to hard labor in one of Stalin's cruelest Gulag camps...(snip)

That has nothing whatsoever to do with the veracity of snopes, troll!!!

I am not a troll.
 

Forum List

Back
Top