Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I DON"T think they DO have the right to choose. I think that right is first and foremost belonging to the pre-born person, who is represented by abortion opponents, and some state governments.I’m not advocating that abortion is an acceptable form of birth control, you are…
Murder is when one human being takes another human beings life, we will continue in this society to justify abortion based on your beliefs, that you choose to defend it, doesn’t make it right…
All women have the right to choose what they want to do with the unborn child that they carry, that’s free will. That doesn’t make it right, but you keep telling yourself it’s none of our business…
Catholics were the ones interested...why did it need to go to the supreme court then?
www.politico.com
www.catholicnewsagency.com
Yes they can...Can a three-year-old live independently?
If you put a toddler out on the streets, to fend for himself, how well will he do?
How about letting the mother decide and not any government official?Let the states decide, and yes people involved in abortions, regardless of their religious affiliations, are murderers when it's about "convenience".
What's a 'pre-born person'?I DON"T think they DO have the right to choose. I think that right is first and foremost belonging to the pre-born person, who is represented by abortion opponents, and some state governments.
And that choice is for LIFE.
{NFBW 23MAY31 to: #541 tnvst} when you say a woman has no right to choose you need more than just “thinking” it. You cannot deprive a pregnant woman of liberty under our Constitution unless her “actions” in liberty as an individual cause harm to you and others, life liberty or property. The burden is on you to provide a complaint to the court Mr Protectnvst if you fear you are being harmed in anyway when a woman chooses to terminate her pregnancy in private and to be able to do so in a safe legal matter no matter why.I think that right is first and foremost belonging to the pre-born person, who is represented by abortion opponents, and some state governments.
Agreed...Well back in the time of Jesus The population of the world was about 300 million at the time of Christ and changed very little in the next thousand years. The population of the world reached one billion in 1804, three billion in 1960, and rose to about 6.8 billion in 2010.
Now what that has to do with abortion is everything! People would NEVER kill a human that would eventually be helping older people to survive.
See the concept of euthanasia was never a concept at that period and keeping people alive was a daily task.
Living as we do with mass-produced food, markets, and restaurants in every town, and giant supermarket complexes that are often just down the road, it takes some imagination to think of finding food every day in the natural environment. Yet that is just what humans (Homo sapiens) have done for most of their time on Earth — from their appearance about 200,000 years ago until about 11,000 years ago when they began to develop agriculture. Before Homo sapiens evolved, our hominine ancestors foraged for millions of years.
So going to McDonalds and in less than 5 minutes you get what your ancestors took all day. So keeping humans alive especially babies was primary in
the early humans survival!
But most of you idiots have NEVER had to scrounge for food most of the day so your appreciation of the sacredness of life is apparent.
A baby not a fetus.so is a baby.
It is a potential person.sure it is, what else is it? a tree?
Buy a dictionaryFALSE
murder is the taking of an INNOCENT human life
The Nazis would agree w/ you though... I'm sure they used your line here as a defense at Nuremberg
You’ve just defined choice. It’s not your decision. It’s the pregnant woman, her doctors and religious or family council. Besides, not one of the so-called pro life arguments has a clue how medical science determines “ extreme circumstances”. They just throw the words out there to cya.The preborn person's needs (to not be killed) rank higher than the pregnant woman's needs (except in some extreme circumstances)
I think that right is first and foremost belonging to the pre-born person,
They had that problem in Ireland before...You’ve just defined choice. It’s not your decision. It’s the pregnant woman, her doctors and religious or family council. Besides, not one of the so-called pro life arguments has a clue how medical science determines “ extreme circumstances”. They just throw the words out there to cya.
Now the quite part Democrats don’t want to talk about out loud:
65% said abortion should usually be illegal in the second trimester, and 80% said that about the third trimester.
In other words, if Democrats are forced to fight for their actual position on abortion legislatively, they'll be demolished. Third-term abortions are an 80%-20% loser. Second-term abortions are a 65%-35% loser.
So... will Democrats fight for a federal abortion law promising people the right to an abortion in the first fifteen weeks of pregnancy? The period of time the current Mississippi law permits? The one they're claiming is a monstrosity that strips away women's rights?
BRING ON THE FIGHT!
AP-NORC poll: Most say restrict abortion after 1st trimester
A new poll shows a solid majority of Americans believe most abortions should be legal in the first three months of a woman’s pregnancy, but most say the procedure should usually be illegal in the second and third trimesters.apnews.com
The extreme circumstances are endless and well beyond any legislation contrived by old white men.They had that problem in Ireland before...
Is the mother feeling suicidal extreme circumstances...
I can give you an example:
Uncle Joe rapes a 17 year old niece Mary... The family keep it hush hush as so not to disgrace the family... Uncle Joe is told to leave (probably to the US).
Mary is pregnant with her uncle's child and with no mental supports and warned if she tells anyone she will be kicked out of the home, never to come back.
I think Mary might have some serious mental issues...
BTW Suppose Uncle Joe says he is not leaving and wants to stay and see the child everyday...
2. Directed at the right: Assuming that my compromise would be enacted and made into law, would you then accept pharmaceutically induced abortions during those first 12 weeks, something that really isn't too much different than miscarriages?
.The preborn person's needs (to not be killed) rank higher than the pregnant woman's needs (except in some extreme circumstances)
You are ignorant. Women don’t get pregnant by themselves stupid..
The preborn did not ask to be here and the pregnant woman could have prevented the creation of the preborn.
Leftist women are really so ignorant that they cannot fathom birth control.
.
.You are ignorant. Women don’t get pregnant by themselves stupid.
That is why it was legalised in Ireland...The extreme circumstances are endless and well beyond any legislation contrived by old white men.
Also......When it comes to a woman’s health during pregnancy, medical science works in probabilities like all science does. I have yet to see legislation that will define pro life exceptions using a percent. Therefore, they have no effin business getting involved.
