8 values political test

[theDoctorisIn]

For comparison, this is what my results are:

I would never call myself a Libertarian.

 

[Preacher]

Racial Socialist. Nothing new. Socialist economically Racialist/Traditionalist socially.

Very interesting, and you voted for Trump. You do know that Trump is nowhere near you, right?

This is example of the failure of this test. There are too many aspects of ideology that it just doesn't cover.

Odium is, for all intents and purposes, a Nazi.

I agree the test fails to account for ALL possible ideologies. Funny thing is I am farther to the left than Hitler is/was on both the economical and social scale. Weird. I wonder how someone could even get Hitler on that scale....

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Racial Socialist. Nothing new. Socialist economically Racialist/Traditionalist socially.

Very interesting, and you voted for Trump. You do know that Trump is nowhere near you, right?

This is example of the failure of this test. There are too many aspects of ideology that it just doesn't cover.

Odium is, for all intents and purposes, a Nazi.

I agree the test fails to account for ALL possible ideologies. Funny thing is I am farther to the left than Hitler is/was on both the economical and social scale. Weird. I wonder how someone could even get Hitler on that scale....

Yeah, that's another problem with the test - how are these reference points of famous people determined?

 

[bripat9643]

We didn't have muslims or fags back them.

Learn American history.

Please identify a Muslim or homosexual from the rebolutionary period.

Don't agree with what I got either. I guess its mostly he economic part it got wrong,it only asked 1 question on socialism and no I don't agree with workers controlling the companies etc....meh....

I got NeoCon, which is weird because I generally don't agree those guys. Must have been my thorough rejection of globalism.

Going with tribalism instead?

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[Mac1958]

Interesting. Got news for you Mac, you're a liberal.

Whatever I am, I'm not a progressive/regressive.

I'd be way up at the Authoritarian line.
.

You certainly are. You're literally right next to Stein.

Stein is definitely to the Left of me, and far more of an authoritarian.

Have her personally take the test and we'll see.
.

 

[SYTFE]

Racial Socialist. Nothing new. Socialist economically Racialist/Traditionalist socially.

Very interesting, and you voted for Trump. You do know that Trump is nowhere near you, right?

This is example of the failure of this test. There are too many aspects of ideology that it just doesn't cover.

Odium is, for all intents and purposes, a Nazi.

Uh, you don't understand the test. Hitler is WAY north of Odium, and to the right. There can be major differences between just a couple of cells within each main quadrant.

 

[SYTFE]

For comparison, this is what my results are:

I would never call myself a Libertarian.

That's simply the social scale. Doesn't have much to do with the actual libertarian party.

 

[strollingbones]

 

[SYTFE]

Racial Socialist. Nothing new. Socialist economically Racialist/Traditionalist socially.

Very interesting, and you voted for Trump. You do know that Trump is nowhere near you, right?

This is example of the failure of this test. There are too many aspects of ideology that it just doesn't cover.

Odium is, for all intents and purposes, a Nazi.

I agree the test fails to account for ALL possible ideologies. Funny thing is I am farther to the left than Hitler is/was on both the economical and social scale. Weird. I wonder how someone could even get Hitler on that scale....

Yeah, that's another problem with the test - how are these reference points of famous people determined?

Voting records. Public speeches.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Racial Socialist. Nothing new. Socialist economically Racialist/Traditionalist socially.

Very interesting, and you voted for Trump. You do know that Trump is nowhere near you, right?

This is example of the failure of this test. There are too many aspects of ideology that it just doesn't cover.

Odium is, for all intents and purposes, a Nazi.

Uh, you don't understand the test. Hitler is WAY north of Odium, and to the right. There can be major differences between just a couple of cells within each main quadrant.

I do understand the test - I think you don't understand what I'm trying to say.

You seem to take issue with the fact that Odium voted for Donald Trump, because they're so far apart on the scale - but they're not far apart in aspects of ideology that this plane simply doesn't measure.

Odium and Trump are both populists, and nationalists.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

For comparison, this is what my results are:

I would never call myself a Libertarian.

That's simply the social scale. Doesn't have much to do with the actual libertarian party.

I know that it doesn't have to do with the "Libertarian Party".

I'm saying that I don't believe the term libertarian applies to me in the slightest bit.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Racial Socialist. Nothing new. Socialist economically Racialist/Traditionalist socially.

Very interesting, and you voted for Trump. You do know that Trump is nowhere near you, right?

This is example of the failure of this test. There are too many aspects of ideology that it just doesn't cover.

Odium is, for all intents and purposes, a Nazi.

I agree the test fails to account for ALL possible ideologies. Funny thing is I am farther to the left than Hitler is/was on both the economical and social scale. Weird. I wonder how someone could even get Hitler on that scale....

Yeah, that's another problem with the test - how are these reference points of famous people determined?

Voting records. Public speeches.

But how are those things measured?

Did someone took the test giving the answers they think those people would have chosen?

Or did the creators of the site just arbitrarily come up with values in line with their opinions of those people?

In either case, is that based in reality, or the opinion of whoever came up with the values?

 

[SYTFE]

For comparison, this is what my results are:

I would never call myself a Libertarian.

That's simply the social scale. Doesn't have much to do with the actual libertarian party.

I know that it doesn't have to do with the "Libertarian Party".

I'm saying that I don't believe the term libertarian applies to me in the slightest bit.

I land in the same quadrant as you and I wouldn't touch the libertarian party with a 10-foot pole either. It's only meant to measure how much individual freedom you personally value and think is best for humanity, as opposed to resonating with power being consolidated at the state level being best for humanity.

 

[SYTFE]

Very interesting, and you voted for Trump. You do know that Trump is nowhere near you, right?

This is example of the failure of this test. There are too many aspects of ideology that it just doesn't cover.

Odium is, for all intents and purposes, a Nazi.

I agree the test fails to account for ALL possible ideologies. Funny thing is I am farther to the left than Hitler is/was on both the economical and social scale. Weird. I wonder how someone could even get Hitler on that scale....

Yeah, that's another problem with the test - how are these reference points of famous people determined?

Voting records. Public speeches.

But how are those things measured?

Did someone took the test giving the answers they think those people would have chosen?

Or did the creators of the site just arbitrarily come up with values in line with their opinions of those people?

In either case, is that based in reality, or the opinion of whoever came up with the values?

Here's their answer on this:

How can you determine where politicians are honestly at without asking them?

How can you tell where they're honestly at by asking them? Especially around election time. We rely on reports, parliamentary voting records, manifestos … and actions that speak much louder than words. It takes us a great deal longer than simply having the politician take the test — but it's also a far more accurate assessment. In our early experience, politicians taking the test often responded in ways that conflicted with their actions but conformed to the prevailing mood of the electorate.

We are occasionally asked about publishing the individual responses of politicians. We frown on this. The propositions are too vague to be considered statements of policy, and the individual responses are not significant in themselves. When summed to give an economic and social score, however, they provide an accurate profile of a mental state.​

 

[Billo_Really]

8values



8values Results


Never heard of what I got. Weird.

This was me...

https://postimage.io/

 

[toobfreak]

I have my doubts on the accuracy of the test but here is my chart:

But I didn't think that was quite right. I'm pretty mellow right now. So I went back and rethought my views at the other end of my mood spectrum and got this:

Not sure what a Neo-Con is. I suspect the truth lies somewhere between these two charts. But I agree: economies must be driven by a free market to create and produce and not some imposed equality. When you impose it, it is not equality at all. You cannot have "fairness" under force.

Diplomatic axis: Nationalist. You betcha. Your own country must come first before you worry about the other guy. Survival of the fittest.

Civil axis: Again, you must have the rule of law and order. Take all these rioting brats in college and cities and throw them in jail.

Societal axis: Technology is important, but should not be confused with progress. A nation without traditions and a stable culture is no country at all. Technological progress while maintaining traditional values. If your values were ever good to begin with, they don't change with time. Values that change day by day are no values at all, they are whims.