The Rabbi
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2009
- 67,733
- 7,923
- Thread starter
- #581
You post an article that supports what I wrote and you call me ignorant?Even worse! I'm glad you said this. It illustrates just how ignorant you are to all the facts. Shame on your ignorant ass.Poor people are obese in our society, not starving. There are no hungry children.Increase the qualifications for food stamps. Problem solved.Minimum wage should be enough that a person who makes minimum wage that works 40 hours shouldn't qualify for food stamps. The US taxpayer is sick of subsidizing mcd's. If you can only afford to pay ten more and you'll have to get rid of ten workers, so be it. Those who lose their jobs will find better jobs. This is America you knowSilly boo boo Micky ds is just an example, it's what you would pay extra if Minimum wage was raised across the board to $15 bucks an hour.
Instead of your weekly budget being say $150 bucks ...
It would be $180???? bucks plus for the same thing .....
Plus the other fact instead of 3% of the workers making minimum wage, you would then have 30%?
WalMart etc is subsidizing the US taxpayer because if they didnt employ these people the taxpayer would be on the hook for all their needs.
Why we should pay for lazy people who cant find a job is a different question.
That sort of defeats the purpose of food stamps if people can't afford food. It figures that you would see hungry children as the problem rather than those who keep them in that position.
Why Poverty Leads to Obesity and Life-Long Problems | Scholars Strategy Network