90,609,000 not included in work force

Are they voting for the Bilderberg parties (Republicans and Democrats) and still wondering why they are unemployed ?

Really !!!!!!!!!!!!

Beijing's Secret War On America -
How China Expects To Win


Beijing's Secret War On America - How China Expects To Win


Endgame

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho]EndGame HQ full length version - YouTube[/ame]


These people are that clueless as to what the Globalists have planned for them and the rest of America.

If Americans don't wake up now then they deserve their future stay in a FEMA Camp !!!!!

Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klqv9t1zVww]Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA Full Length - YouTube[/ame]
 
mbs3h.jpg
 
Guess what started happening in 2011.

The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.

That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.

They are not.

Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)

Not in the labor force
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.​

You can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.
 
Guess what started happening in 2011.

The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.

That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.

They are not.

Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)
Not in the labor force
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.​
You can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.

That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.

You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.

Below is an excerpt FROM the article:

One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News
 
Last edited:
Guess what started happening in 2011.

The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.

That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.

They are not.

Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)
Not in the labor force
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.​
You can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.

That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.

You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.

Below is an excerpt FROM the article:

One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News

Yep, you're right. I goofed.
 
That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.

They are not.

Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)
Not in the labor force
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.​
You can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.

That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.

You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.

Below is an excerpt FROM the article:

One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News

Yep, you're right. I goofed.

No-one has denied this
but the thing that is missed is this number is now having a HUGE effect on the UE rate
were taking away more than we are adding
the number of people working today are still below 2008 levels
Tax policy from the GOP in 01-03 added 4 million jobs from 03-08
In reality sense 09 we have only added about 10% of that and 0 sense 2008
 
Their idea of lowering unemployment is all about the number, and the easiest way to get that number down is to discourage people from looking. It beats actually creating an environment for people to prosper.
 
Their idea of lowering unemployment is all about the number, and the easiest way to get that number down is to discourage people from looking. It beats actually creating an environment for people to prosper.

Dill baby Drill
look at the states that are adding jobs
ND
SD
WYoming
Texas
Okl
La
without it there would be no jobs sense 09 added (we are still below 08 levels)
 
The economy is better today than it was in January, 2009. This is a fact. Celebrate the good news, nutters. Urge your representatives to work toward making things better...regardless of who occupies the WH.

Be Americans who root for America to succeed. It will feel good. I promise.
 
Their idea of lowering unemployment is all about the number, and the easiest way to get that number down is to discourage people from looking. It beats actually creating an environment for people to prosper.

Dill baby Drill
look at the states that are adding jobs
ND
SD
WYoming
Texas
Okl
La
without it there would be no jobs sense 09 added (we are still below 08 levels)

Couldn't agree more, I got one boy in Alberta, and one in ND. Getting trades and tickling six figures while many of their buddies are crying the blues about an unfair life with massive debt for a useful degree that they can't even wipe their ass with.
They are desperate for people willing to work out there!
 
The economy is better today than it was in January, 2009. This is a fact. Celebrate the good news, nutters. Urge your representatives to work toward making things better...regardless of who occupies the WH.

Be Americans who root for America to succeed. It will feel good. I promise.

I am all for lower corp tax rates
no income tax
and drill abay drill (ND has 3% UE)
 
That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.

You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.

Below is an excerpt FROM the article:

One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News

Yep, you're right. I goofed.

No-one has denied this
but the thing that is missed is this number is now having a HUGE effect on the UE rate
were taking away more than we are adding
the number of people working today are still below 2008 levels
Tax policy from the GOP in 01-03 added 4 million jobs from 03-08
In reality sense 09 we have only added about 10% of that and 0 sense 2008

yet there were 200,000 less on social security retirement at the end of 2012 than at the end of 2010. And the number for 2012 was at 2,735,007. 2,997,498 in 2010 A far cry from that 90 million number

Annual Statistical Supplement, 2013 - OASDI Awards to Retired Workers (6.B)
http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/supplement/2011/5b.html
 
Last edited:
Guess what started happening in 2011.

The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.

And?
That hardly accounts for the massive unemployment that is largely off the books. The worst is among those 18-25, with an unemployment/underemployment rate over 40%.
No way to spin this. Obama's recovery has been worse than Bush's recession.
 
Guess what started happening in 2011.

The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.

That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.

They are not.

Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)
Not in the labor force
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.​
You can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.

That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.

You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.

Below is an excerpt FROM the article:

One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News

Right. So it's not necessarily that boomers are retiring, it's that they aren't being replaced. Can you see the forest for the trees?
 
Guess what started happening in 2011.

The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.

And?
That hardly accounts for the massive unemployment that is largely off the books. The worst is among those 18-25, with an unemployment/underemployment rate over 40%.
No way to spin this. Obama's recovery has been worse than Bush's recession.

The Govt had little to do with the 08 crash
And BHO has had little to do with the recovery as well
without "fracking" where would we be?
states like ND, Okl, Texas, La, etc... have created most of the jobs BHO taking cerdit for

Drilling for oil and natural gas in shale rock is supporting 1.7 million U.S. jobs this year, including workers outside the energy industry such as waiters and shop clerks, according to researcher IHS Global Insight.
Fracking Will Support 1.7 Million Jobs, Study Shows - Businessweek
 

Forum List

Back
Top