90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News
that is nuts
were allmost to 1 in 3
that is nuts
were allmost to 1 in 3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Employment among women hits 24 year low too
154,000 Fewer Women Held Jobs in September; Female Participation in Labor Force Matches 24-Year Low | CNS News
Wow Obama and liberals have really saved this country. They've fought the good fight. Thank God for them
Guess what started happening in 2011.
The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.
Guess what started happening in 2011.
The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.
That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.
They are not.
Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)Not in the labor forceYou can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.
Guess what started happening in 2011.
The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.
That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.
They are not.
Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)Not in the labor forceYou can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.
That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.
You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.
Below is an excerpt FROM the article:
One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News
That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.
They are not.
Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)Not in the labor forceYou can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.
That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.
You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.
Below is an excerpt FROM the article:
One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News
Yep, you're right. I goofed.
Their idea of lowering unemployment is all about the number, and the easiest way to get that number down is to discourage people from looking. It beats actually creating an environment for people to prosper.
Their idea of lowering unemployment is all about the number, and the easiest way to get that number down is to discourage people from looking. It beats actually creating an environment for people to prosper.
Dill baby Drill
look at the states that are adding jobs
ND
SD
WYoming
Texas
Okl
La
without it there would be no jobs sense 09 added (we are still below 08 levels)
The economy is better today than it was in January, 2009. This is a fact. Celebrate the good news, nutters. Urge your representatives to work toward making things better...regardless of who occupies the WH.
Be Americans who root for America to succeed. It will feel good. I promise.
That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.
You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.
Below is an excerpt FROM the article:
One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News
Yep, you're right. I goofed.
No-one has denied this
but the thing that is missed is this number is now having a HUGE effect on the UE rate
were taking away more than we are adding
the number of people working today are still below 2008 levels
Tax policy from the GOP in 01-03 added 4 million jobs from 03-08
In reality sense 09 we have only added about 10% of that and 0 sense 2008
Guess what started happening in 2011.
The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.
Guess what started happening in 2011.
The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.
That would be important if retirees were counted as part of the labor force.
They are not.
Labor Force Characteristics (CPS)Not in the labor forceYou can try to sugar-coat Obama's abysmal unemployment record, but don't expect anyone to buy it.
Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Information is collected on their desire for and availability for work, job search activity in the prior year, and reasons for not currently searching. See also Labor force and Discouraged workers.
That's the POINT. They're NOT part of the labor force.
You might want to at LEAST read the article before you so easily make yourself look foolish.
Below is an excerpt FROM the article:
One reason for the increasing number of people not in the labor force is the aging of the Baby Boom generation, whose members have begun retiring--and are not being replaced by an equal number of young people entering the labor force. - See more at: 90,609,000: Americans Not in Labor Force Climbs to Another Record | CNS News
Guess what started happening in 2011.
The first of the baby boom generation (1946-1964) reached the retirement age of 65.
And?
That hardly accounts for the massive unemployment that is largely off the books. The worst is among those 18-25, with an unemployment/underemployment rate over 40%.
No way to spin this. Obama's recovery has been worse than Bush's recession.