Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It seems you should take your own advice. You accused me of talking about an amendment when that was not even the topic of my post.....would you like me to quote myself again so you can show me where I'm even talking about amendments?This is what I said:Where did I say that 3/4th of the people have to vote for an amendment.....link my comment about that.....if you have time.Yawn.
Yes, I know you have no use for facts or logic, but they exist nonetheless.
You sack of shit, that is clearly what you were getting at. Can't you just be honest about ANYTHING? I mean seriously, just one damn time say "yes that is what I meant"
I seriously would like to know, are you gay as a result of your dishonesty, or did being gay lead to being dishonest as a matter of course?
Either way you're a piece of shit.
They live in this little fantasy bubble world where 3/4ths of the people in the U.S. hate gays and want to fight gay marriage like they do.
Where is it where I referred to that 3/4ths of the people are needed to pass an amendment in that comment?
You aren't very good at this, are you?
Shut up Pete, you have no business being in an adult discussion. You CLEARLY thought 3/4 of the people had to approve of a Constitutional Amendment, why you can't just say "oh I made a mistake" and move on is just sad.
They live in this little fantasy bubble world where 3/4ths of the people in the U.S. hate gays and want to fight gay marriage like they do.
I still own you.
I own so much inside your head.I still own you.No one is interested in your personal story either, which is why you've made up this Walter Mitty existence of being a lesbian retired Naval Aviator who now owns an unspecified business.
WTF....a retired Naval Aviator? Fill me in.
LOL read this thread
http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/the-plywood-must-get-through.267021/
I've NEVER seen someone so thoroughly outed as a fraud and a liar in my life. How Pete has the nerve to return here ish just beyond me.
LOL if you owned everyone who knew what a liar you are you would have an army of thousands. I mean seriously, there couldn't possibly be anyone in this world who thinks you're an honest person at this point. Africans over in the deepest part of the jungle if asked would say "that Pete him big liah"
I can be gone for days and you can't stop talking about me anyways...... How sad it must be for you that I can control you so completely. 
When you have to be rude and resort to personal insults, you've already failed. ...
I own so much inside your head.I still own you.No one is interested in your personal story either, which is why you've made up this Walter Mitty existence of being a lesbian retired Naval Aviator who now owns an unspecified business.
WTF....a retired Naval Aviator? Fill me in.
LOL read this thread
http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/the-plywood-must-get-through.267021/
I've NEVER seen someone so thoroughly outed as a fraud and a liar in my life. How Pete has the nerve to return here ish just beyond me.
LOL if you owned everyone who knew what a liar you are you would have an army of thousands. I mean seriously, there couldn't possibly be anyone in this world who thinks you're an honest person at this point. Africans over in the deepest part of the jungle if asked would say "that Pete him big liah"
I own so much inside your head.I still own you.WTF....a retired Naval Aviator? Fill me in.
LOL read this thread
http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/the-plywood-must-get-through.267021/
I've NEVER seen someone so thoroughly outed as a fraud and a liar in my life. How Pete has the nerve to return here ish just beyond me.
LOL if you owned everyone who knew what a liar you are you would have an army of thousands. I mean seriously, there couldn't possibly be anyone in this world who thinks you're an honest person at this point. Africans over in the deepest part of the jungle if asked would say "that Pete him big liah"
What can I say, I find you to be a compelling, yet repulsive case study of everything that is wrong with humanity today. I mean you honestly don't have one single redeeming quality that anyone on this board could see.
I mean you're such a shitty person that you have created this persona where you admit that you had to have acted dishonorably in order to have had the career that you claimed you had. That's pathetic Pete.
You're so fucking pathetic that even on an anonymous message board when you have CLEARLY made an error, you can't just say "oops, I was wrong" when it's quite clear to everyone reading this thread that you WERE wrong.
Grow up Pete.
I mean
And, as has been pointed out, repeatedly, Judicial review of legislation - whether passed by congress, or by referendum - is the purpose of the Judicial Branch. So what you are angry about is the 9th Circuit doing what the Constitution says the 9th Circuit is supposed to do.What about heteros who have any kind of sex besides missionary position....are they satan spawned too?
This thread is about the 9th Circuit overturning our VOTE on the matter of them trying to destroy the concept of marriage....that's it.
So the "will of the majority" is not subject to the Constitution? That is really your contention?Not when it overthrows the will of the majority.So...you don't think a federal court has the power of Judicial Review?What about heteros who have any kind of sex besides missionary position....are they satan spawned too?
You got the whole playbook memorized don't ya......I expect it's because you have to defend your perversion so often. In truth, like I've said several times already, I don't care who has sex with whom as long as they are of age, willing, and not drunk or stoned. This thread is about the 9th Circuit overturning our VOTE on the matter of them trying to destroy the concept of marriage....that's it. The rest of your atheist bullshit is about you, not us.
You people keep talking about the "Will of the people" as if that somehow invalidates the Constitution. Did you guys all take the same civics class that skips Constitutional Authority, or something?Congratulations to Arizona for joining the long list of states who recognize gay marriages
Arizona has no recognized that sexual abnormality is normal.
But how cool is it that a "Democrat" is here to CELEBRATE the irrational judicial edict, which OVERTURNS: THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
For those not paying attention, what you see in the above 'celebration', is yet another glaring demonstration, producing more PROOF of the Deceit which the Left FRAUDULENTLY advances as a means to influence THE IGNORANT!
The pithy expression of which is:
Deceit, FRAUD, Ignorance = Socialism.
Until they end up in the minority on such a vote, I'd wager.So the "will of the majority" is not subject to the Constitution? That is really your contention?Not when it overthrows the will of the majority.So...you don't think a federal court has the power of Judicial Review?What about heteros who have any kind of sex besides missionary position....are they satan spawned too?
You got the whole playbook memorized don't ya......I expect it's because you have to defend your perversion so often. In truth, like I've said several times already, I don't care who has sex with whom as long as they are of age, willing, and not drunk or stoned. This thread is about the 9th Circuit overturning our VOTE on the matter of them trying to destroy the concept of marriage....that's it. The rest of your atheist bullshit is about you, not us.
I just posted the link fake marine. You said you grew up in Detroit but you are trying to claim Arizona. I think you are pissed because I got you banned under your alias Traintime. People that run around with 2 usernames have no credibility. Anyone curious just do a search on the liars escapades under Traintime.Dont be mad I busted you lying again fake marine.
C'mon faux willie....you claimed you had the LINK....so where is it?
Or admit you're a lying sack of shit and leave this board forever....
Your choice.
Wait a minute! Are you actually arguing that marriage is a function of natural law?!?! You do get that marriage is a social construct, right? For fuck's sake! monogamy isn't even a biological imperative, let alone marriage!...marriage is defined, by the natural design of the species...
You're absolutely right. However, sans a Constitutional amendment to the constitution of the UNITED STATES, guess how much weight any state law - even a state Constitutional amendment - carries in relation to rights guaranteed under the Federal Constitution?It's happening all over, and there's nothing you can do about it. How helpless does that make you feel right now?In my case....married woman to woman.married man to womanAnd in the married bedroom.
A woman cannot marry a woman.
You see scamp, marriage is defined, by the natural design of the species, as the joining of one man and one woman.
At best what you have is a room-mate contract. While legally binding, it is in no way relevant to marriage, and this without regard to the presense by the advocacy to normalize sexual abnormality, to the contrary.
Completely incorrect. An amendment to the COTUS could be passed.
Commander.
You people keep talking about the "Will of the people" as if that somehow invalidates the Constitution. Did you guys all take the same civics class that skips Constitutional Authority, or something?Congratulations to Arizona for joining the long list of states who recognize gay marriages
Arizona has no recognized that sexual abnormality is normal.
But how cool is it that a "Democrat" is here to CELEBRATE the irrational judicial edict, which OVERTURNS: THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
For those not paying attention, what you see in the above 'celebration', is yet another glaring demonstration, producing more PROOF of the Deceit which the Left FRAUDULENTLY advances as a means to influence THE IGNORANT!
The pithy expression of which is:
Deceit, FRAUD, Ignorance = Socialism.
You're absolutely right. However, sans a Constitutional amendment to the constitution of the UNITED STATES, guess how much weight any state law - even a state Constitutional amendment - carries in relation to rights guaranteed under the Federal Constitution?It's happening all over, and there's nothing you can do about it. How helpless does that make you feel right now?In my case....married woman to woman.married man to woman
A woman cannot marry a woman.
You see scamp, marriage is defined, by the natural design of the species, as the joining of one man and one woman.
At best what you have is a room-mate contract. While legally binding, it is in no way relevant to marriage, and this without regard to the presense by the advocacy to normalize sexual abnormality, to the contrary.
Completely incorrect. An amendment to the COTUS could be passed.
Commander.
See that is the problem with your little "will of the people: argument. You want to make state laws that transgress the United States Constitution, without, first, amending the United States Constitution to allow for the suspension of those rights.
Ya did it backwards. Go ahead, and propose that amendment. By the way, you would actually need two. Because first you would have to pass an amendment that repeals, or limits the 14th.
Good luck with that. Lemme know how that works out for ya.
You're absolutely right. However, sans a Constitutional amendment to the constitution of the UNITED STATES, guess how much weight any state law - even a state Constitutional amendment - carries in relation to rights guaranteed under the Federal Constitution?It's happening all over, and there's nothing you can do about it. How helpless does that make you feel right now?In my case....married woman to woman.
A woman cannot marry a woman.
You see scamp, marriage is defined, by the natural design of the species, as the joining of one man and one woman.
At best what you have is a room-mate contract. While legally binding, it is in no way relevant to marriage, and this without regard to the presense by the advocacy to normalize sexual abnormality, to the contrary.
Completely incorrect. An amendment to the COTUS could be passed.
Commander.
See that is the problem with your little "will of the people: argument. You want to make state laws that transgress the United States Constitution, without, first, amending the United States Constitution to allow for the suspension of those rights.
Ya did it backwards. Go ahead, and propose that amendment. By the way, you would actually need two. Because first you would have to pass an amendment that repeals, or limits the 14th.
Good luck with that. Lemme know how that works out for ya.
Sadly... being strong believers in natural law and impeccable purveyors of sound reasoning, the framers did not set protections for mouthy pervs to force their own debauched sexual needs upon the culture at large.
But IF THEY HAD! ... MAN! ... THAT would have been a great point!
Sadly... being strong believers in natural law and impeccable purveyors of sound reasoning, the framers did not set protections for mouthy pervs to force their own debauched sexual needs upon the culture at large.
But IF THEY HAD! ... MAN! ... THAT would have been a great point!
Most of them also didn't think blacks were fully human. Or women were equal.
So there's that.
