A convicted felon / President?

[Leo123]

So simple you can’t! Hilarious

You can tell true low information lefties like her, they thinkj Google is still a viable search engine and Gee Whiz.....It always agrees with them!!!!.

 

[Catsnmeters]

A crooked judge,

Crooked? In what way?

sliced and diced charges

These laws have been on the books for decades. They were hardly sliced and diced.

and a hate-Trump jury.

How did you find out the name of the jurors?

Why would Trump's defense team put Trump haters on the jury?

Trump kept bragging about how people in New York City love him. He would leave the courtroom and be awash with adoration from New Yorkers. If anything, given Trump's popularity, the jury was partial to Trump.

 

[Catsnmeters]

You can tell true low information lefties like her, they thinkj Google is still a viable search engine and Gee Whiz.....It always agrees with them!!!!.

Which search engines do you consider viable?

 

[Billiejeens]

Yeah, what part, spell it out to me.

The words part.

 

[whitehall]

The Constitution makes no distinction about frivolous charges but the Constitution is explicit in the requirement that a president be born in the USA. So far nobody has ever seen Hussein Obama's genuine Birth Certificate.

 

[jc456]

Crooked? In what way?



These laws have been on the books for decades. They were hardly sliced and diced.


How did you find out the name of the jurors?

Why would Trump's defense team put Trump haters on the jury?

Trump kept bragging about how people in New York City love him. He would leave the courtroom and be awash with adoration from New Yorkers. If anything, given Trump's popularity, the jury was partial to Trump.

Name the felony

 

[jc456]

A crooked judge, sliced and diced charges and a hate-Trump jury.

Still no felony charge

 

[Leo123]

Crooked? In what way?



These laws have been on the books for decades. They were hardly sliced and diced.


How did you find out the name of the jurors?

Why would Trump's defense team put Trump haters on the jury?

Trump kept bragging about how people in New York City love him. He would leave the courtroom and be awash with adoration from New Yorkers. If anything, given Trump's popularity, the jury was partial to Trump.

Judge Juan Merchan. See here....

"WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Senator JD Vance (R-OH) called on the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to open a criminal investigation into Judge Juan Merchan for his illegal deprivation of President Donald J. Trump’s First Amendment rights. In his letter, Senator Vance argues Judge Merchan’s conduct against President Trump, including his imposition of a gag order, his refusal to dismiss prospective jurors who harbored obvious anti-Trump bias, and his barring of exculpatory evidence, could amount to criminal deprivation of rights violations under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–42."

https://www.vance.senate.gov/press-releases/senator-vance-calls-for-criminal-investigation-into-judge-merchan/

Not the laws the charges. They can take one charge and dissect it into elements that may be actionable. That way if the defendant is overall not guilty they can pick one charge they are 'guilty' of.

Didn't need the names of the jurors. Just look at their 'news' consumption.

A convicted felon / President?

So simple you can’t! Hilarious You can tell true low information lefties like her, they thinkj Google is still a viable search engine and Gee Whiz.....It always agrees with them!!!!.

www.usmessageboard.com

Mostly leftist NYT. Do you think a juror is going to divulge their hatred for Trump? LOL....When were you born, yesterday? People in NY did love Trump.......Until he got political and did not join the far left Democrats.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Name the felony

This again?

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

 

[jc456]

This again?

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

Not felonies

 

[Catsnmeters]

Judge Juan Merchan. See here....

"WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Senator JD Vance (R-OH) called on the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to open a criminal investigation into Judge Juan Merchan for his illegal deprivation of President Donald J. Trump’s First Amendment rights. In his letter, Senator Vance argues Judge Merchan’s conduct against President Trump, including his imposition of a gag order, his refusal to dismiss prospective jurors who harbored obvious anti-Trump bias, and his barring of exculpatory evidence, could amount to criminal deprivation of rights violations under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–42."

https://www.vance.senate.gov/press-releases/senator-vance-calls-for-criminal-investigation-into-judge-merchan/

You don't actually think this means anything so you? JD Vance? ROFL.

Not the laws the charges. They can take one charge and dissect it into elements that may be actionable. That way if the defendant is overall not guilty they can pick one charge they are 'guilty' of.

You will need to be more specific.

Didn't need the names of the jurors. Just look at their 'news' consumption.

A convicted felon / President?

So simple you can’t! Hilarious You can tell true low information lefties like her, they thinkj Google is still a viable search engine and Gee Whiz.....It always agrees with them!!!!.

www.usmessageboard.com

View attachment 1006101
Mostly leftist NYT. Do you think a juror is going to divulge their hatred for Trump? LOL....When were you born, yesterday? People in NY did love Trump.......Until he got political and did not join the far left Democrats.

Your speculation about what the jurors thought of Trump is irrelevant.

The jurors were selected in accordance with the law and whining about what you think the jurors think is pointless.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Not felonies

NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov

www.nysenate.gov

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Since Donald Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts earlier this year, I was wondering:

Has America ever had a convicted felon / President?

Maybe some of you history buffs can tell me, because I can't recall one.

Not that I am aware of.

Looking forward to a first !

 

[Shareprofit]

A crooked judge, sliced and diced charges and a hate-Trump jury.

Calling the judge crooked, oh dear we heard the same when you MAGA morons tried to challenge the 2020 election 61 times, 61 crooked judges. You MAGA are clowns.

 

[Shareprofit]

The words part.

So you can't explain what I'm being delusional about. What we do know as a fact, your guy was bonking whores while his third wife was nursing his child and tried to cover it up before an election. What part of that is delusional?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime

What other crime?

 

[Leo123]

Calling the judge crooked, oh dear we heard the same when you MAGA morons tried to challenge the 2020 election 61 times, 61 crooked judges. You MAGA are clowns.

Yep, judges can be crooked the 2020 election cases were not dismissed for lack of merit. You might want to read more instead of parroting Democrat talking points.

 

[Leo123]

What other crime?

Whatever 'crime' they make up.

 

[Shareprofit]

Yep, judges can be crooked the 2020 election cases were not dismissed for lack of merit. You might want to read more instead of parroting Democrat talking points.

So 61 judges at random and now this one judging Trump's election fraud trial are all corrupt but your guy is not. That's a big call. You must be deep cult pal

 

[Leo123]

You don't actually think this means anything so you? JD Vance? ROFL.



You will need to be more specific.


Your speculation about what the jurors thought of Trump is irrelevant.

The jurors were selected in accordance with the law and whining about what you think the jurors think is pointless.

Yeah shoot the messenger. Typical leftist crap. I gave you data proving most jurors get their news from Trump hating, leftist, biased news media. It is certainly NOT 'irrelevant.'