A few questions for the fundies

[Taz]

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed, that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

Your Godwin is noted and you lose.


My point stands.


Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, normal is like me, you're all nuts.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

My questions for you when you've gain full power in this nation are:
1. Will I be able to live(at all) in your christian fundie nation 10 years from now?
2. Will I still be able to watch porno and have freaky sex with my wife?
3. Will I be able to talk about the shit I do today 10 years from now when you're fully in power? Meaning will I be allowed to discuss issues that have to do with LGBT?

As a white, straight Christian male you’ll still be able to do most anything – of course, porn will be illegal.

If you are gay, transgender, a woman, a Muslim, or someone free from faith, however, you’ll be subject to all manner of discrimination sanctioned by the state.

 

[Avatar4321]

Weak.

The guy’s a Mormon, ancient submarines, golden plates, magic underwear... which by any measurement doesn’t equate to a complete grasp on reality, like the GOP.

If my grasp on reality is so bad, why are you the one making stuff up?

Like what?

Magic underwear and ancient submarines.

Which I've pointed out as straw men to you before.

You believe in ancient subs and wear "special" underwear. Please try again.

Repeating yourself won't make of true. Merry Christmas anyway

 

[Avatar4321]

I've known plenty of mormons. They tend to be good productive members of society, however they get there.

That's the reality of the situation.

And you making fun of their religion, says more about you, then them.

Ya, it says I know funny when I see it, they don't.

My answer to the OP stands.

In REpublican controlled America, you have freedom of speech.

IN the UK, controlled by people more like Mathew and you, you do not.


I'll side with the Mormons and their magic underwear over you lefties any day.

In your republican America you also have freedom to live in a make believe world and be taken seriously.

Minus your spin, I agree that in America you have religious Freedom.


I just think that is a good thing.


YOu are against it.

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

No. We don't need governments protecting you from religious ideas you don't like

 

[Avatar4321]

Which I've pointed out as straw men to you before.

No they're not. The magic underwear is a central tenet and idea of Mormonism, and thw magical submarines are featured prominently in the religious text. Where are you getting your info?

Actually reading the religious text. Actually participating in the religion.

Please find one Mormon document talking about magic underwear or ancient submarines. You won't because its a bunk attack.

Bullshit, dude. Utter bullshit. Acquiring the magic undergarments is an inportant rite of passage in Mormonism, by every account. And the religious text clearly talks about magic submarines.

Once again emphasizing you've never read or studied anything Mormons teach

 

[Avatar4321]

My questions for you when you've gain full power in this nation are:
1. Will I be able to live(at all) in your christian fundie nation 10 years from now?
2. Will I still be able to watch porno and have freaky sex with my wife?
3. Will I be able to talk about the shit I do today 10 years from now when you're fully in power? Meaning will I be allowed to discuss issues that have to do with LGBT?

You'll be fine. The religious nutballs are on the wrong side of history.

I heard this, Nazi. Do not think we sleep at Christmas.

Not scared. Literally all we have to do is sit here and watch the fundies drive away their kids and then die off.

Sure. And the sun is an iceberg - that's why we need a climate change.

Probability of fundamental religious nutball also being a climate denier = 100%

You mean they look at facts? Is that controversial for you?

 

[Avatar4321]

No President of the US has ever been a real religious person otherwise they wouldn't have waged war on others constantly.

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

Taz not being rational? That's like water being wet

 

[Avatar4321]

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed,

Learn something about real history.

that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

After you learn to read English, because I'm right on point. So how many times have you read Mein Kampf? More than 100?

How many times have you read it?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Once again emphasizing you've never read or studied anything Mormons teach

yes, the magical undergarments are a key facet of Mormonism. You are lying to say otherwise: The Secrets of Mormon Underwear, Revealed

yes, there are magical submarines in the Mormon religious text. Again, you are lying to say otherwise: Book of Ether - Wikipedia

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You mean they look at facts?

Of course that's not what I mean, you weirdo. "Fundamental religious nutball" = NOT looking at any facts

"Climate denier" = NOT looking at facts.

geez, pay attention!

 

[Correll]

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed, that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

Your Godwin is noted and you lose.


My point stands.


Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, normal is like me, you're all nuts.

Your irrational denial of basic concepts makes a mockery of your rationalization for your bigotry, ie your attacking them for being irrational, while you are being irrational yourself.


Your hatred has led you to become what you claim to hate about them.

 

[zaangalewa]

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed,

Learn something about real history.

that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

After you learn to read English, because I'm right on point. So how many times have you read Mein Kampf? More than 100?

It exists around the Holocaust a lot of myths. One myth for example is the "Reichskristallnacht" - later also called "Reichspogromnacht", what's in this case a wrong expression of the word "pogrom", when you take a look at the etymology of this word. The Reichkristallnacht was not a pogrom in the central meaning of this word. It was a planed pogrom - it was an enactment. Only the Nazi-propaganda spoke about that the people were fighting against Jews. The reality was completely different: The Reichskristallnacht was an organized military action. In Berlin for example the SA started in the night, when nearly no one was in the streets any longer. The Nazis (in uniforms) followed exact plans. A member of the SA destroyed for example shop windows of "Jewish" shops. In whole Germany all Nazis together destroyed the complete production of a year of whole Europe for glass for shop windows - that's why it was called "Reichskristallnacht" (Reich = also "rich" and not only "empire", Kristall = Crystal = destroyed glas, splinter of glas; Nacht=night). Others attacked Jewish families in their homes. The police (which was completely under control of Heinrich Himmler, who was also the head of the SS) arrested Jews and so one. Fire departments for example inflamed synagogues and other Jewish buildings and ... and what did the Germans do? The normal people? They slept, they saw something was goin' on, they stayed at home. It was dangerous to go out and so they did nothing. ... And the Nazi propaganda said afterwards the German people had made a kind of revolution against the evil Jews. And afterwards - in a kind of self-fulfilling idiocy - indeed more and more people started to help the Nazis, because of the pressure to adapt. But also in this case you never saw a civil mob in Germany under the Nazis. The Nazis themselves lived in fear of an organized German resistance or unorganized mob against them.

You follow by the way still the war propaganda of world war 2 of the USA. This propaganda was: "Every German is a Nazi. Kill every German". This was specially important for the bomber pilots, who had no psychological problem with this form of propaganda to kill German children and women.

 

[Taz]

The guy’s a Mormon, ancient submarines, golden plates, magic underwear... which by any measurement doesn’t equate to a complete grasp on reality, like the GOP.

If my grasp on reality is so bad, why are you the one making stuff up?

Like what?

Magic underwear and ancient submarines.

Which I've pointed out as straw men to you before.

You believe in ancient subs and wear "special" underwear. Please try again.

Repeating yourself won't make of true. Merry Christmas anyway

So you're saying that Mormons don't wear their special underwear anymore and you took out the part about ancient subs in the book of Mormons? Good for you.

 

[Taz]

Ya, it says I know funny when I see it, they don't.

My answer to the OP stands.

In REpublican controlled America, you have freedom of speech.

IN the UK, controlled by people more like Mathew and you, you do not.


I'll side with the Mormons and their magic underwear over you lefties any day.

In your republican America you also have freedom to live in a make believe world and be taken seriously.

Minus your spin, I agree that in America you have religious Freedom.


I just think that is a good thing.


YOu are against it.

We need Freedom FROM religion. Religion is a make-believe thing and we take it WAY too seriously. Some religious freedom is ok, but we've gone way overboard...

No. We don't need governments protecting you from religious ideas you don't like

We already have government protection from cuckoo religious ideas, like teaching creation in school over science based things like evolution, which is not allowed. The government also doesn't let you take an eye for an eye, in which case you'll also be charge with aggravated assault. And I could go on and on...

 

[Taz]

YOu didn't address my point regarding the fact that we have Freedom OF religion and asking that you be honest with the vast majority of this nation, who are religious, when you go to amend the constitution to replace that with Freedom FROM religion.


Also, SO, your answer to my question, indirectly admits that Obama was not a religious person.


Yet he constantly pretended to be a religious person.


What a dishonest piece of shit.


I assume you voted for him twice? not counting primaries?

Never voted for Obummer, I'm a Libertarian. And agnostic. That the vast majority of the US SAY that they believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that no one has ever seen and who even gives a shit about what they do, is proof that the general population has the IQ of a toddler who believes in Santa Claus, and also shows the need to be protected against such buffoonery. Would an Amendment pass? Of course not, too many delusional people in the US. And good thing that they all have guns!

This entire society that you are a part of, was primarily built by religious people.

Your words reveal you to be a bigot, nothing more.

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

Taz not being rational? That's like water being wet

Says the guy wearing the magic underwear.

 

[Taz]

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed,

Learn something about real history.

that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

After you learn to read English, because I'm right on point. So how many times have you read Mein Kampf? More than 100?

How many times have you read it?

Zero. You?

 

[Taz]

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed, that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

Your Godwin is noted and you lose.


My point stands.


Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, normal is like me, you're all nuts.

Your irrational denial of basic concepts makes a mockery of your rationalization for your bigotry, ie your attacking them for being irrational, while you are being irrational yourself.


Your hatred has led you to become what you claim to hate about them.

Hard to argue with total nonsense. Bravo!

 

[Taz]

Just because most people are stupid and that I don't particularly like stupid people doesn't make me a bigot, just normal.

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed,

Learn something about real history.

that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

After you learn to read English, because I'm right on point. So how many times have you read Mein Kampf? More than 100?

It exists around the Holocaust a lot of myths. One myth for example is the "Reichskristallnacht" - later also called "Reichspogromnacht", what's in this case a wrong expression of the word "pogrom", when you take a look at the etymology of this word. The Reichkristallnacht was not a pogrom in the central meaning of this word. It was a planed pogrom - it was an enactment. Only the Nazi-propaganda spoke about that the people were fighting against Jews. The reality was completely different: The Reichskristallnacht was an organized military action. In Berlin for example the SA started in the night, when nearly no one was in the streets any longer. The Nazis (in uniforms) followed exact plans. A member of the SA destroyed for example shop windows of "Jewish" shops. In whole Germany all Nazis together destroyed the complete production of a year of whole Europe for glass for shop windows - that's why it was called "Reichskristallnacht" (Reich = also "rich" and not only "empire", Kristall = Crystal = destroyed glas, splinter of glas; Nacht=night). Others attacked Jewish families in their homes. The police (which was completely under control of Heinrich Himmler, who was also the head of the SS) arrested Jews and so one. Fire departments for example inflamed synagogues and other Jewish buildings and ... and what did the Germans do? The normal people? They slept, they saw something was goin' on, they stayed at home. It was dangerous to go out and so they did nothing. ... And the Nazi propaganda said afterwards the German people had made a kind of revolution against the evil Jews. And afterwards - in a kind of self-fulfilling idiocy - indeed more and more people started to help the Nazis, because of the pressure to adapt. But also in this case you never saw a civil mob in Germany under the Nazis. The Nazis themselves lived in fear of an organized German resistance or unorganized mob against them.

You follow by the way still the war propaganda of world war 2 of the USA. This propaganda was: "Every German is a Nazi. Kill every German". This was specially important for the bomber pilots, who had no psychological problem with this form of propaganda to kill German children and women.

So you admit that the German people did nothing. That's called being tacitly complicit. Now you know.

 

[Correll]

Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed, that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

Your Godwin is noted and you lose.


My point stands.


Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, normal is like me, you're all nuts.

Your irrational denial of basic concepts makes a mockery of your rationalization for your bigotry, ie your attacking them for being irrational, while you are being irrational yourself.


Your hatred has led you to become what you claim to hate about them.

Hard to argue with total nonsense. Bravo!

Says the man who thinks that he gets to define what is "normal", instead of the vast majority of people.


What is hard for you to argue against, is the obvious truth that you are either a liar or delusional.


YOu attack religious people being irrational, AS YOU ARE BEING IRRATIONAL YOURSELF.

 

[Taz]

No, if most people like in Nazi Germany want all Jews gassed, that's still not normal no matter if 100% of the population goes along with it.

Your Godwin is noted and you lose.


My point stands.


Normal is by definition, defined by the majority or, "most".


That's common english.


Your claim to be different than the "most" and yet be "normal"


is ironically a stupid and irrational statement.

No, normal is like me, you're all nuts.

Your irrational denial of basic concepts makes a mockery of your rationalization for your bigotry, ie your attacking them for being irrational, while you are being irrational yourself.


Your hatred has led you to become what you claim to hate about them.

Hard to argue with total nonsense. Bravo!

Says the man who thinks that he gets to define what is "normal", instead of the vast majority of people.


What is hard for you to argue against, is the obvious truth that you are either a liar or delusional.


YOu attack religious people being irrational, AS YOU ARE BEING IRRATIONAL YOURSELF.

I'm agnostic, as I see no proof either way for or against the possibility of a god, but am willing to change my mind given real proof either way. The thinking person's position.
Religious people on the other hand believe in an invisible superbeing in another dimension that nobody has seen or been to, and who wants us to follow a book.