A lot of us see no way for the Jury to convict Trump

It really should be an acquittal, but you know that there will be just a few hard-left radicals that don’t care about the law - only getting Trump.

My expectation is that it will be a hung jury, and my fear is that the Soros-funded DA will call for a new trial.
A new trial could not start until after the election and would not be completed before he takes office.
 
Winco whipped you, now slink away.
Robert W , I provided the PROOF in post #115.
Read it.

The ONLY evidence you claim to have saying Shokin was this by you

Shokin was not corrupt at all.
And a 'story' made up by Rudy and Trump and told by John Solomon.
You got NOTHING to actually back any of your ( Robert W ) claims about Shokin.
You got Zilch.
If you think you have something PROVING that Shokin was actually prosecuting corruption, then simply post it.
 
Robert W , I provided the PROOF in post #115.
Read it.

The ONLY evidence you claim to have saying Shokin was this by you


And a 'story' made up by Rudy and Trump and told by John Solomon.
You got NOTHING to actually back any of your ( Robert W ) claims about Shokin.
You got Zilch.
If you think you have something PROVING that Shokin was actually prosecuting corruption, then simply post it.
First thing first. I went to eat. I have family here hoping I spend time with them and not your horseshit.

Your lying that you attack both parties has your nose glowing like a roman candle.
Everytime you talk to me, you go against only Republicans. Does not matter the crime Done, you charge after me like the Democrat you are to defend the Biden regime.

Biden never proved Shokin was corrupt. But even were he to have proof, it is not for a VP of the USA to charge in and demand some country start firing. It appears it was to save his 0wn son who now is going on trial and let's see you defend his corruption.
 
First thing first. I went to eat. I have family here hoping I spend time with them and not your horseshit.

Your lying that you attack both parties has your nose glowing like a roman candle.
Everytime you talk to me, you go against only Republicans. Does not matter the crime Done, you charge after me like the Democrat you are to defend the Biden regime.

Biden never proved Shokin was corrupt. But even were he to have proof, it is not for a VP of the USA to charge in and demand some country start firing. It appears it was to save his 0wn son who now is going on trial and let's see you defend his corruption.
Yawn........
Screenshot 2024-05-27 at 7.58.44 PM.png
 
You're getting more and more rabid. That's expected. It always happens with the hardcore fascists.

They'll say awful and depraved things.

People will call them out for being such shit humans.

Rather than behave better, they react with sputtering hatred towards the people who dared call them out.

And so they go into a sanity/morality death spiral, consuming themselves with hatred.
For almost 8 years now that is just what Democrats have done and keep doing.
 
Except... you guys have been trying to pin something on Biden for five years now and you can barely prove his son did something wrong.
That's how "justice" works in a Stalinist Regime. Political prisoners, lawfare, "Show me the man I'll give you the crime".
 
I attack your lies.
You have NO proof that Shokin was prosecuting Corruption, YET I have provided the proof that Shokin was NOT prosecuting the corruption in Ukraine.


seeking to pressure President Poroshenko to force his officials, especially in the Prosecutor General’s Office (PGO) to crack down more, not less, on corruption. “Corruption kills,” Pyatt said in the address to the Odesa Financial Forum for business leaders. “It kills productivity and smothers inspiration. Ideas are lost in its shadow. Innovation and entrepreneurship lag under the weight of bribery, back room dealing, and bullying.”

While giving Shokin a last chance to shape up (Pyatt says, “We want to work with Prosecutor General Shokin so the PGO is leading the fight against corruption.”), the ambassador criticizes “officials at the PGO’s office” for not providing documents that were needed for the British investigation of Burisma owner Zlochevskiy and effectively allowing Zlochevskiy to transfer $23 million of what Pyatt says were Ukrainian taxpayer assets to Cyprus. In other words, Pyatt is critical of the prosecutor’s office for not aiding in investigations of Burisma’s owner, which was in line with Biden’s criticism that the office was blocking corruption investigations. Pyatt specifically called for the investigation and removal of officials who were involved in the failure to help the British authorities investigate Zlochevskiy:
You have balls talking that way about Ukraine. America is now ruled by a corrupt president. The same criminal who went after Ukraine trying to boss them around. Well his kid was on Burisma. How fucking special. And Biden the corrupt lectured them about corruption?

Winco is whipped. Soundly I add.
 
You always show up to attack Republicans and defend Democrats. Shokin was not corrupt at all. Look at how long it takes to nail Bidens ass into a prison cell.
A better description of Shokin is that he wasnt doing his job.
That job was fighting corruption in Ukraine.
So, the EU wanted him out. But they need the help of the US to oust Shokin, so they could get someone in there who would actually do the job. It wasnt until the United States stepped in, then ukraine was motivated to get rid of Shokin. As a side note, this had absolutely zilch to do with Burisma.
 
Laws. That is why all the other trials are being delayed.
If it is a hung jury, they would have to do a new trial and complete it by September 5 to avoid the election season's end.

There won't be enough time for it.

If the scoundrel is found NG, that will be it for him, and I think he has an excellent chance to win in November.
 
Last edited:
If it is a hung jury, they would have to do a new trial and complete it by September 5 to avoid the election season's end.

There won't be enough time for it.

If the scoundrel is found NG, that will be it for him, and I think he has an excellent chance to win in November.
Trump doesn’t have to be found “not guilty.” The prosecution has to prove that he IS guilty - and beyond a reasonable doubt.

Ans the fact is…..the only reason a misdemeanor of falsifying business records (which hasn’t been proved and is ordinarily expired anyway) was elevated to a felony is due to the claim it was committed to hide an “underlying crime.” The “underlying crime” has never been identified.

Let’s say you get caught with hiding a joint - a misdemeanor - and you have an enemy who is a powerful prosecutor. Years later, after the statute of limitations has run out, the nasty prosecutor decides he wants to ruin your life and claims you hid the joint to conceal ANOTHER crime. Doesn’t he have to say what the underlying crime? Otherwise, anyone could take expired misdemeanors and make some general claim about “another crime” never identified to elevate it to felonies.
 
Testimony said Trump was well aware and directed how those charges would be listed
Falsifying business records is a crime

The jury will decide
Who said it? The convicted perjurer who said he wants to see Trump in prison?

And falsifying business records is only a misdemeanor, long since expired. And besides, there was no evidence that Trump falsified anything. His staff paid invoices from the lawyer and labeled them….duh….Legal Expenses.
 

A lot of us see no way for the Jury to convict Trump​


How a jury can find Trump guilty

Find that payments were made to cover up his sex with a porn star
Find that Trump was aware of the payments
Find that Trump directed or was aware that they would be hidden as a business expense.
Find that it was done to cover up another crime
 

Forum List

Back
Top