Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ya think that there might be a difference -morally speaking- between two consenting adults who happen to be of the same gender getting married , and a pussy groper who fucked around behind his pregnant wife, divorced twice, and paid off porn stars to hide his affairs?Franklin Graham is the very same guy who steadfastly refuses to condemn Trump's infidelities.What a blessing this man is. He knows gays, especially Buttigieg, are disciples of Satan.
’Something to be repentant of’: Franklin Graham blasts Buttigieg for being gay
How does that fucker stand the stench of his own hypocrisy?
Pretty sure Franklin Graham condemned TRUMP past behavior and he wasn't on board with TRUMP during the campaign. The difference with TRUMP is he is not promoting his past behavior, Pete Butt is and that is the issue Graham is touching on.
Ya think there might be difference between not actually feeling invested in people's private lives, and claiming not to while actually feeling the need to condemn anyone you don't like?
Let me be clear: if your response to "Homosexuality is a sin, and Mayor Pete doesn't get to redefine Christianity to dismiss that" is "Well, DONALD TRUMP FUCKED WOMEN, SO THERE!" then it's pretty clear you not only have no valid, rational argument, but also that you're the village idiot who should be pitied.
Adultery is a sin. Homosexuality is also a sin. Donald Trump has never, to my knowledge, told anyone that adultery is not a sin, and that God is perfectly okay with it. Mayor Pete HAS tried to say that homosexuality is not a sin, and that God is okay with it.
Everyone commits sins, because no one is perfect. Christians do not expect people to be perfect, and believe in redemption. Leftists demand that anyone who has ever committed a sin while also being someone that the left doesn't like must be condemned and shunned and reviled for the rest of their lives for it, all while screeching like deranged parakeets that Christians are the ones who are judgemental and intolerant.
I hope this clarifies things for you, although I have no real expectation of it.
The bible calls it an abomination, unrighteous, and also specifically states that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of god.Ya think that there might be a difference -morally speaking- between two consenting adults who happen to be of the same gender getting married , and a pussy groper who fucked around behind his pregnant wife, divorced twice, and paid off porn stars to hide his affairs?Franklin Graham is the very same guy who steadfastly refuses to condemn Trump's infidelities.What a blessing this man is. He knows gays, especially Buttigieg, are disciples of Satan.
’Something to be repentant of’: Franklin Graham blasts Buttigieg for being gay
How does that fucker stand the stench of his own hypocrisy?
Pretty sure Franklin Graham condemned TRUMP past behavior and he wasn't on board with TRUMP during the campaign. The difference with TRUMP is he is not promoting his past behavior, Pete Butt is and that is the issue Graham is touching on.
Ya think there might be difference between not actually feeling invested in people's private lives, and claiming not to while actually feeling the need to condemn anyone you don't like?
Let me be clear: if your response to "Homosexuality is a sin, and Mayor Pete doesn't get to redefine Christianity to dismiss that" is "Well, DONALD TRUMP FUCKED WOMEN, SO THERE!" then it's pretty clear you not only have no valid, rational argument, but also that you're the village idiot who should be pitied.
Adultery is a sin. Homosexuality is also a sin. Donald Trump has never, to my knowledge, told anyone that adultery is not a sin, and that God is perfectly okay with it. Mayor Pete HAS tried to say that homosexuality is not a sin, and that God is okay with it.
Everyone commits sins, because no one is perfect. Christians do not expect people to be perfect, and believe in redemption. Leftists demand that anyone who has ever committed a sin while also being someone that the left doesn't like must be condemned and shunned and reviled for the rest of their lives for it, all while screeching like deranged parakeets that Christians are the ones who are judgemental and intolerant.
I hope this clarifies things for you, although I have no real expectation of it.
Which Bible verses specifically call homosexuality a sin? (Hint: there are zero verses that specifically call homosexuality a sin).
If it ain't specifically called a sin, I don't call it one either.
I disagree, from both a political and a religious perspective.
Politically, it's rarely a good idea to let your opponent's assertion of "fact" go unchallenged.
Religiously, challenging false prophets is part of his job description.
But people like graham ARE false prophets. He doesn't represent the Supreme Being on earth.
On what do you base that opinion on?
The impression that graham seeks to give the public that he is a spokesperson for the Supreme Being, which he is not. I don't think that Pope Francis, or the Archbishop of Canterbury, or the Dalai Lama are anointed spokespeople for the Supreme Being, not to mention the Orthodox Christian Pope, the Coptic Christian Pope, the Chief Iman of Mecca, or the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem.
graham is just another cult guy. Have fun following Leviticus and Deuteronomy. Your kosher kitchen sounds yummy. How are those side-curls coming?
The impression that Graham seeks to give the public is that he's a minister who preaches the doctrines of Christianity, which is true. What is NOT true is when Pope Francis seeks to give the impression that HE is the spokesperson for the Supreme Being, instead of just another minister. Ditto the Archbishop of Canterbury, and any other religious leader who believes in a Supreme Being. The Dalai Lama, being Buddhist, doesn't believe in a Supreme Being. I would think a self-proclaimed "religious expert and moral arbiter of the universe" like you would know that.
Graham is just another minister. Cults aren't defined by "believing something that hate-filled morons like Lice don't like". Have fun trying to judge and condemn people who scorn your existence. How is that pretending to matter coming?
graham THINKS (maybe) that he is "preaching to doctrines of Christianity" like he is some sort of expert and has some direct line to the Supreme Being. Poor you if you believe his nonsense. He's just another guy with a big mouth. Believe what you want. Whatever cult leader you want. If you choose to follow the religion captained by graham, jeffress, swaggart, robertson, I would advise you to refuse an offer of Kool-Aid.
True! But just the ones that keep the donations flowing in. Let's all be crystal clear about that.No, Graham IS preaching the doctrines of Christianity.
The bible calls it an abomination, unrighteous, and also specifically states that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of god.Ya think that there might be a difference -morally speaking- between two consenting adults who happen to be of the same gender getting married , and a pussy groper who fucked around behind his pregnant wife, divorced twice, and paid off porn stars to hide his affairs?Franklin Graham is the very same guy who steadfastly refuses to condemn Trump's infidelities.
How does that fucker stand the stench of his own hypocrisy?
Pretty sure Franklin Graham condemned TRUMP past behavior and he wasn't on board with TRUMP during the campaign. The difference with TRUMP is he is not promoting his past behavior, Pete Butt is and that is the issue Graham is touching on.
Ya think there might be difference between not actually feeling invested in people's private lives, and claiming not to while actually feeling the need to condemn anyone you don't like?
Let me be clear: if your response to "Homosexuality is a sin, and Mayor Pete doesn't get to redefine Christianity to dismiss that" is "Well, DONALD TRUMP FUCKED WOMEN, SO THERE!" then it's pretty clear you not only have no valid, rational argument, but also that you're the village idiot who should be pitied.
Adultery is a sin. Homosexuality is also a sin. Donald Trump has never, to my knowledge, told anyone that adultery is not a sin, and that God is perfectly okay with it. Mayor Pete HAS tried to say that homosexuality is not a sin, and that God is okay with it.
Everyone commits sins, because no one is perfect. Christians do not expect people to be perfect, and believe in redemption. Leftists demand that anyone who has ever committed a sin while also being someone that the left doesn't like must be condemned and shunned and reviled for the rest of their lives for it, all while screeching like deranged parakeets that Christians are the ones who are judgemental and intolerant.
I hope this clarifies things for you, although I have no real expectation of it.
Which Bible verses specifically call homosexuality a sin? (Hint: there are zero verses that specifically call homosexuality a sin).
If it ain't specifically called a sin, I don't call it one either.
So it's not much of a leap to call it a sin.
True! But just the ones that keep the donations flowing in. Let's all be crystal clear about that.No, Graham IS preaching the doctrines of Christianity.
Of course! They are conmen. Glad we agree.That would be all of them
The bible calls it an abomination, unrighteous, and also specifically states that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of god.Ya think that there might be a difference -morally speaking- between two consenting adults who happen to be of the same gender getting married , and a pussy groper who fucked around behind his pregnant wife, divorced twice, and paid off porn stars to hide his affairs?Franklin Graham is the very same guy who steadfastly refuses to condemn Trump's infidelities.
How does that fucker stand the stench of his own hypocrisy?
Pretty sure Franklin Graham condemned TRUMP past behavior and he wasn't on board with TRUMP during the campaign. The difference with TRUMP is he is not promoting his past behavior, Pete Butt is and that is the issue Graham is touching on.
Ya think there might be difference between not actually feeling invested in people's private lives, and claiming not to while actually feeling the need to condemn anyone you don't like?
Let me be clear: if your response to "Homosexuality is a sin, and Mayor Pete doesn't get to redefine Christianity to dismiss that" is "Well, DONALD TRUMP FUCKED WOMEN, SO THERE!" then it's pretty clear you not only have no valid, rational argument, but also that you're the village idiot who should be pitied.
Adultery is a sin. Homosexuality is also a sin. Donald Trump has never, to my knowledge, told anyone that adultery is not a sin, and that God is perfectly okay with it. Mayor Pete HAS tried to say that homosexuality is not a sin, and that God is okay with it.
Everyone commits sins, because no one is perfect. Christians do not expect people to be perfect, and believe in redemption. Leftists demand that anyone who has ever committed a sin while also being someone that the left doesn't like must be condemned and shunned and reviled for the rest of their lives for it, all while screeching like deranged parakeets that Christians are the ones who are judgemental and intolerant.
I hope this clarifies things for you, although I have no real expectation of it.
Which Bible verses specifically call homosexuality a sin? (Hint: there are zero verses that specifically call homosexuality a sin).
If it ain't specifically called a sin, I don't call it one either.
So it's not much of a leap to call it a sin.
Of course! They are conmen. Glad we agree.That would be all of them
Men, knowing that their punishment for rape is a life sentence of supporting his victim and any children were never very interested in willy nilly raping women they might happen across. He could refuse the marriage and receive death.Laws of Rape (Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NAB)Reading the bible...duh.But people like graham ARE false prophets. He doesn't represent the Supreme Being on earth.
On what do you base that opinion on?
If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.
Wow. I think that is so republican. Just think, if you rape a woman your punishment would be to marry her. Then you get to rape her over and over again as much as you want. That’s the new Christianity.
Me personally? I don’t support that. But I know who does!
Notice that not one word is said about the person who, having endured rape once, must be committed to experience rape throughout her entire life.This entire arrangement has no room in it for the voice of the person whose body is being gambled. Who is being forced into a life of rape and bearing children for her continuing rapist? Where is the justice for her? What does the term "morality" actually mean?
And what of the woman in such a barbaric and primitive society? No other man would want her. Couldn't she just get a good paying job, buy her own home and be a single mother when it suited her? Well, no. She couldn't do any of those things. She would be a burden to her family for her life. Or she could be a beggar. Or she could turn to prostitution to feed herself. Gee so many options.
To make life as equitable as possible female virginity was subject to Pottery Barn laws. You break it. You own it.
Says you. Loom around... Cafeteria christians pick and choose. And that is a good thing.Well, the verse that calls it an abomination is from Leviticus, which is the manual for Jewish priests, not Christians.
The bible calls it an abomination, unrighteous, and also specifically states that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of god.Ya think that there might be a difference -morally speaking- between two consenting adults who happen to be of the same gender getting married , and a pussy groper who fucked around behind his pregnant wife, divorced twice, and paid off porn stars to hide his affairs?Pretty sure Franklin Graham condemned TRUMP past behavior and he wasn't on board with TRUMP during the campaign. The difference with TRUMP is he is not promoting his past behavior, Pete Butt is and that is the issue Graham is touching on.
Ya think there might be difference between not actually feeling invested in people's private lives, and claiming not to while actually feeling the need to condemn anyone you don't like?
Let me be clear: if your response to "Homosexuality is a sin, and Mayor Pete doesn't get to redefine Christianity to dismiss that" is "Well, DONALD TRUMP FUCKED WOMEN, SO THERE!" then it's pretty clear you not only have no valid, rational argument, but also that you're the village idiot who should be pitied.
Adultery is a sin. Homosexuality is also a sin. Donald Trump has never, to my knowledge, told anyone that adultery is not a sin, and that God is perfectly okay with it. Mayor Pete HAS tried to say that homosexuality is not a sin, and that God is okay with it.
Everyone commits sins, because no one is perfect. Christians do not expect people to be perfect, and believe in redemption. Leftists demand that anyone who has ever committed a sin while also being someone that the left doesn't like must be condemned and shunned and reviled for the rest of their lives for it, all while screeching like deranged parakeets that Christians are the ones who are judgemental and intolerant.
I hope this clarifies things for you, although I have no real expectation of it.
Which Bible verses specifically call homosexuality a sin? (Hint: there are zero verses that specifically call homosexuality a sin).
If it ain't specifically called a sin, I don't call it one either.
So it's not much of a leap to call it a sin.
Well, the verse that calls it an abomination is from Leviticus, which is the manual for Jewish priests, not Christians.
As far as the other parts? Those were the opinions of the apostle Paul, not Jesus.
In this case,its defined as frauds who say what it takes to get your money,regardless of whether there is any truth to what they say.And conmen isn't defined as "people who teach things I don't like, so I assume they have sinister motives."
In this case,its defined as frauds who say what it takes to get your money,regardless of whether there is any truth to what they say.And conmen isn't defined as "people who teach things I don't like, so I assume they have sinister motives."
Yes they are frauds.
Jesus never uttered a word or opinion about polesmokers.
But he sure as shit had a LOT to say about hypocrites.
He also said anyone who divorces and remarries is an adulterer. Adultery is in the top ten.
The bible also has a lot to say about people who steal. And people who bear false witness against others.
So, yeah, fake Christians. Don't vote for the gay guy. Tell yourselves that as good Christians you have to support the serial adulterer, thief, and liar who runs casinos and contests of the flesh and encourages the worst of human weaknesses.
Try to pretend you aren't a fucking raging hypocrite.
Oh shit; that means Trump is on the highway to Hell ............
Gay people suck... literally
No shit dummy,i literally just stated a definition. If you want to play with your little dollies so that you have someone easier to talk to that doesn't make you feel stupid, then shut up and go do that.sigh* Fraud is not defined as "someone Fart Fun attributes sinister motives to because he doesn't like them".
It has to do with the Bible saying that if a man rapes a woman he is responsible for her for life. In cultures that did not have a Bible men faced nothing at all from their crime of rape. Making the man responsible is morality.Men, knowing that their punishment for rape is a life sentence of supporting his victim and any children were never very interested in willy nilly raping women they might happen across. He could refuse the marriage and receive death.Laws of Rape (Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NAB)Reading the bible...duh.On what do you base that opinion on?
If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.
Wow. I think that is so republican. Just think, if you rape a woman your punishment would be to marry her. Then you get to rape her over and over again as much as you want. That’s the new Christianity.
Me personally? I don’t support that. But I know who does!
Notice that not one word is said about the person who, having endured rape once, must be committed to experience rape throughout her entire life.This entire arrangement has no room in it for the voice of the person whose body is being gambled. Who is being forced into a life of rape and bearing children for her continuing rapist? Where is the justice for her? What does the term "morality" actually mean?
And what of the woman in such a barbaric and primitive society? No other man would want her. Couldn't she just get a good paying job, buy her own home and be a single mother when it suited her? Well, no. She couldn't do any of those things. She would be a burden to her family for her life. Or she could be a beggar. Or she could turn to prostitution to feed herself. Gee so many options.
To make life as equitable as possible female virginity was subject to Pottery Barn laws. You break it. You own it.
I take it that this "rule" has absolutely nothing to do with anything called "morality," as it has been sold to us females over the centuries. It is only based on some male's story that a female is "broken" somehow, as she is a "thing," not a human being.You admit that this situation has nothing to do with a Supreme Being. It has only to do with men swapping a "thing" between themselves.
To Republicans, the Bible is a checklist. There’s things in there they can use to hate opponents. They can use things in the Bible to beat others they don’t like over the head. But they don’t really share these beliefs themselves.
Laws of Rape (Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NAB)
If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.
