A man of substance and knowledge states his opinion of Trump

[ClosedCaption]

Who says this man is knowledgeable? Your opinion. And no one cares about his opinion.

Do you really think many people will be swayed at this point?

No actually, Trump has peppered you guys with so many lies, reversals, fake enemies and revisions that at this point you don't even care about what is true or not because you're invested to heavily into Trump, the man.

So no matter what happens you will still support Trump.

I swear I could go onto the convention floor and ask someone for $100 and when they refuse all I would have to say Is:

Obama or the press said they wouldn't give it to me.

And they'd hand it over

 

[Ringel05]

You have your take, he has his, I have mine, everyone has theirs, all are influence to some degree by each individual's own bias. I case you missed my obvious inference I'm not judging his film-making I'm questioning his built in bias. Take an honest look at what I meant, go on, try it........

Well, I like a historian like Ken Burns while you like a historian like Sean Hannity....Go figure.

And you're an assumptive idiot but we already knew that.

The reason I say you're an assumptive idiot is because I forget slightly educated morons don't know much about a lot of fields of endeavor. When I mentioned Burns was a film-maker first and a historian second I wasn't putting him down, I also stated I took the middle ground on his documentaries. If you have a strong knowledge of history, psychology and cultural anthropology you'll know what I'm referring to. As a film-maker the goal is to make the subject matter interesting and in doing so one must present that information from a specific perspective. His anthropological perspective is based in the 20th century, not the 19th century where it belongs to completely understand the whys, that is the only reservation I have concerning his pre-20th century documentaries, the facts themselves he presents are not disputed by the vast majority of historians, myself included.
So you see, you made an incorrect assumption based on what you thought I said, based on your bias. Way to go.........

 

[Ringel05]

Like many other historians I take the middle road with the understanding that Burns is a film maker first and a historian second which means he has strong social and political opinions that through doubt on his ability to be unbiased.

Just "judge" (if you can) Burns statement about Trump, without judging his film-making. Go on, try it.

His statement reeks of psychological projection.

Let me guess, you had one semester of psych and you think you're an expert.......

 

[Ringel05]

The best creator of documentories on history, Ken Burns, states his opinion of Trump.

Ken Burns is dishonest.

No he's not. Michael Moore is a dishonest propagandist, not Ken Burns, That guy with the Indian name (that escapes my recollection right this minute) is a dishonest propagandist.

 

[Muhammed]

Like many other historians I take the middle road with the understanding that Burns is a film maker first and a historian second which means he has strong social and political opinions that through doubt on his ability to be unbiased.

Just "judge" (if you can) Burns statement about Trump, without judging his film-making. Go on, try it.

His statement reeks of psychological projection.

Let me guess, you had one semester of psych and you think you're an expert.......

Just been studying it for over 4 decades.

 

[Kondor3]

The LibTards are really stretching and reaching for material now, aren't they?

Dinner AND a show...

I'm sure he'll be backed up by somebody really important, like Flo, the insurance girl..

You had a lot of fun with Bill Ayers and Obama didn't you?......Well Cohn (may the devil torture his soul) was much worse. Enjoy!

I have no idea what you're talking about.

Then again, neither do you, so, it's a wash.

 

[nat4900]

Just been studying it for over 4 decades.

I just love you Trump U. alumni. Maybe the 5th decade may be the charm.....

 

[Ringel05]

Like many other historians I take the middle road with the understanding that Burns is a film maker first and a historian second which means he has strong social and political opinions that through doubt on his ability to be unbiased.

Just "judge" (if you can) Burns statement about Trump, without judging his film-making. Go on, try it.

His statement reeks of psychological projection.

Let me guess, you had one semester of psych and you think you're an expert.......

Just been studying it for over 4 decades.

With that statement of psychological projection...... Sure ya have......

 

[Ringel05]

Like many other historians I take the middle road with the understanding that Burns is a film maker first and a historian second which means he has strong social and political opinions that through doubt on his ability to be unbiased.

Just "judge" (if you can) Burns statement about Trump, without judging his film-making. Go on, try it.

His statement reeks of psychological projection.

Let me guess, you had one semester of psych and you think you're an expert.......

Just been studying it for over 4 decades.

With that statement of psychological projection...... Sure ya have......

Explain Paradigm Perspectives and developmental stimuli without looking it up.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Holy shit!! I just watched the video in the OP and I thought you were talking about the ghostwriter for the Art of the Deal. This guy said the exact same thing I've been saying almost verbatim

How do you combat people who don't care about the truth with Truth?

 

[Muhammed]

Like many other historians I take the middle road with the understanding that Burns is a film maker first and a historian second which means he has strong social and political opinions that through doubt on his ability to be unbiased.

Just "judge" (if you can) Burns statement about Trump, without judging his film-making. Go on, try it.

His statement reeks of psychological projection.

Let me guess, you had one semester of psych and you think you're an expert.......

Just been studying it for over 4 decades.

With that statement of psychological projection...... Sure ya have......

Look at the speech at Stanford in the beginning. The guy accuses Trump of demonstrating no interest in anything but himself and his own self interests. That definitely does not describe a philanthropist like Trump, so who is he talking about?

He's talking about himself.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

perhaps the most salient point that Burns makes is summarized in this article's excerpt.

Roy Cohn, the lurking legal hit man for red-baiting Sen. Joe McCarthy, whose reign of televised intimidation in the 1950s has become synonymous with demagoguery, fear-mongering and character assassination. In the formative years of Donald Trump’s career, when he went from a rich kid working for his real estate-developing father to a top-line dealmaker in his own right, Cohn was one of the most powerful influences and helpful contacts in Trump’s life.

Read more: Roy Cohn: Joe McCarthy's henchman and Donald Trump's mentor

The LibTards are really stretching and reaching for material now, aren't they?

Dinner AND a show...

I'm sure he'll be backed up by somebody really important, like Flo, the insurance girl...

They are scared shitless.

 

[2aguy]

The best creator of documentories on history, Ken Burns, states his opinion of Trump.

Wow.....a left wing socialist who sucks on the government tit to make his documentaries.....yeah.....he really knows what he is talking about......

 

[Muhammed]

Burns accuses Trump of fear mongering. Then later implies that if Trump wins this country would become like Germany and Italy in the 30s. Who's fear mongering?

Again, Burns is talking about himself.

Clear case of psychological projection.

 

[Ringel05]

Just "judge" (if you can) Burns statement about Trump, without judging his film-making. Go on, try it.

His statement reeks of psychological projection.

Let me guess, you had one semester of psych and you think you're an expert.......

Just been studying it for over 4 decades.

With that statement of psychological projection...... Sure ya have......

Look at the speech at Stanford in the beginning. The guy accuses Trump of demonstrating no interest in anything but himself and his own self interests. That definitely does not describe a philanthropist like Trump, so who is he talking about?

He's talking about himself.

My apologies, It appeared you were referring to me.
As for whether Trump is a true philanthropist or a self aggrandizing narcissist is something I have not determined and really am not interested in. Of course you do know if you have studied psychology that even philanthropy can be for selfish motives hence my statement concerning possible narcissism.

 

[Kondor3]

perhaps the most salient point that Burns makes is summarized in this article's excerpt.

Roy Cohn, the lurking legal hit man for red-baiting Sen. Joe McCarthy, whose reign of televised intimidation in the 1950s has become synonymous with demagoguery, fear-mongering and character assassination. In the formative years of Donald Trump’s career, when he went from a rich kid working for his real estate-developing father to a top-line dealmaker in his own right, Cohn was one of the most powerful influences and helpful contacts in Trump’s life.

Read more: Roy Cohn: Joe McCarthy's henchman and Donald Trump's mentor

The LibTards are really stretching and reaching for material now, aren't they?

Dinner AND a show...

I'm sure he'll be backed up by somebody really important, like Flo, the insurance girl...

They are scared shitless.

'
Good. Even if Attila the Hun doesn't win, he'll put the fear of God back into the arrogant little phukkers... and they're long overdue for such an "intervention".