Jets
Platinum Member
- Jun 29, 2019
- 4,301
- 2,597
- 940
If Conservatives continually declare they will not compromise with the other side, they are forcing voters to decide on one side or the other.
Looks like they are losing that one
And creating the “one party rule” which seems to be the OPs bete noire.
So why the fuck should I, or any other REAL American give any consideration to the enemy?As it should. I don't want the GOP to be butt buddies with the DemocRATs.Which is exactly what you Leftist turds want. The GOP to completely cave in. No, the job of the opposition is to oppose. Not compromise, not negotiate, not play nicey nice. But oppose at all costs!One party rule is inevitable if compromise between the two parties is capitulation.
I do not speak for “leftist turds”, but your argument creates the problem you are lambasting!
If “oppose at all costs” is the GOP mantra, than by default you have one party rule. There is no way around it when one side loses an election and weaponizes obstruction.
I understand that, but that POV creates the “one party rule” that you are railing against. By not serving as the loyal opposition and finding areas of agreement you are forcing the one party to rule by itself.
To obviate the ”one party rule”, which is the subject of your OP.
Let’s recapitulate here. According to you, The problem is the Democratic Party being the sole arbiter of power in government.
If the GOP will not contribute to legislation, than it allows the majority to usurp the same power you are complaining about.
Is any of this resonating?