occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
A fetus by itself is not a viable form of life. It cannot be discussed separately from the mother. You are comparing two different things in two different places.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Zone1 A Question: Why would a bacteria be considered life on Mars and a heartbeat not be considered life on Earth?
- Thread starter Cougarbear
- Start date
- Moderator
- #22
Pro-some lifers feel a fertilized egg has more rights over a woman’s body than she does. Go figure.The pro-abortion and atheists would consider finding life on Mars something to protect but not a living person inside their mother's womb. Why would a bacteria be considered then life on Mars and a heart beat not be considered life on Earth?
A fertilized egg has more value than the incredible array of intelligent life around us even.
Cougarbear
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2022
- 9,124
- 3,996
- 208
- Thread starter
- #23
Neither is a new born baby able to live on its own. So, you are okay with killing babies, infants, toddlers? Where does it end? You sound like Herod.A fetus by itself is not a viable form of life. It cannot be discussed separately from the mother. You are comparing two different things in two different places.
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
I sound like a person that detests stupid questions. How is an apple on Mars not an orange on Earth? That's what you are asking. Comparisons have to have something in common. A fetus is not a bacterium and Earth is not Mars. I could tell you how to make this a fair comparison but I'm not going to. I've given you all the hints a rational person would need.Neither is a new born baby able to live on its own. So, you are okay with killing babies, infants, toddlers? Where does it end? You sound like Herod.
Both are examples of life. Neither are examples of people.The pro-abortion and atheists would consider finding life on Mars something to protect but not a living person inside their mother's womb. Why would a bacteria be considered then life on Mars and a heart beat not be considered life on Earth?
kjw47
Gold Member
Nice question Cougarbear-- All can seriously think about what really is priority.The pro-abortion and atheists would consider finding life on Mars something to protect but not a living person inside their mother's womb. Why would a bacteria be considered then life on Mars and a heart beat not be considered life on Earth?
Cougarbear
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2022
- 9,124
- 3,996
- 208
- Thread starter
- #27
We are questioning the belief an unborn child is not a life worth living because it isn't wanted. And, most bacteria is not wanted here on earth. We do everything to kill bacteria here on earth. So, I would assume we would do likewise on Mars. Yet, atheists are happy about life being on Mars and probably wouldn't kill it. But, they have no problem killing a child because it is stuck in the mom's tummy.I sound like a person that detests stupid questions. How is an apple on Mars not an orange on Earth? That's what you are asking. Comparisons have to have something in common. A fetus is not a bacterium and Earth is not Mars. I could tell you how to make this a fair comparison but I'm not going to. I've given you all the hints a rational person would need.
Cougarbear
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2022
- 9,124
- 3,996
- 208
- Thread starter
- #28
So, a fetus isn't human? Like I wrote, when does this evil end? After birth? at 2 years of age? 10? 15? We can kill children at any age?Both are examples of life. Neither are examples of people.
Cougarbear
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2022
- 9,124
- 3,996
- 208
- Thread starter
- #29
You know that atheists always try to prove humans are really Martians and thus there is no God.Nice question Cougarbear-- All can seriously think about what really is priority.
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
If you are just going to make emotional arguments you should probably abandon all future attempts at logical comparisons.We are questioning the belief an unborn child is not a life worth living because it isn't wanted. And, most bacteria is not wanted here on earth. We do everything to kill bacteria here on earth. So, I would assume we would do likewise on Mars. Yet, atheists are happy about life being on Mars and probably wouldn't kill it. But, they have no problem killing a child because it is stuck in the mom's tummy.
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #31
Pro-some lifers feel a fertilized egg has more rights over a woman’s body than she does. Go figure.
A fertilized egg has more value than the incredible array of intelligent life around us even.
Cougarbear
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2022
- 9,124
- 3,996
- 208
- Thread starter
- #32
My comments are quite logical. They just don't fit your narrative that children should not be seen at all in this life...If you are just going to make emotional arguments you should probably abandon all future attempts at logical comparisons.
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
Your silly comments are irrelevant to my criticism of your initial ham-handed comparison.My comments are quite logical. They just don't fit your narrative that children should not be seen at all in this life...
A fertilized egg is human tissue. A fetus is a person when it develops the things that make humans unique, a functioning human brain.So, a fetus isn't human? Like I wrote, when does this evil end? After birth? at 2 years of age? 10? 15? We can kill children at any age?
Votto
Diamond Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 55,705
- 55,810
- 3,605
Killjoy.Because leftists are murdering butchering monsters.
In case you're interested in facts, Section 1303 of the ACA clarifies that health insurance plans are not required to cover abortion. It also allows states to pass laws prohibiting or limiting abortion coverage on plans in their exchanges, and 25 states had done so as of 2022This is all you need to know
marvin martian
Diamond Member
The pro-abortion and atheists would consider finding life on Mars something to protect but not a living person inside their mother's womb. Why would a bacteria be considered then life on Mars and a heart beat not be considered life on Earth?
Because the pro-aborts are a death cult. They would happily kill life on Mars as well. It's all about the killing for them.
OhPleaseJustQuit
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2021
- 51,588
- 61,365
- 3,488
.A fetus by itself is not a viable form of life. It cannot be discussed separately from the mother. You are comparing two different things in two different places.
The stories leftist vermin tell themselves to keep from having to have a conscience.
Conscience doesn't feel good.
.
OhPleaseJustQuit
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2021
- 51,588
- 61,365
- 3,488
.In case you're interested in facts, Section 1303 of the ACA clarifies that health insurance plans are not required to cover abortion. It also allows states to pass laws prohibiting or limiting abortion coverage on plans in their exchanges, and 25 states had done so as of 2022
And I'm glad I live in one of them.
No baby killing in my state.
Choke on it.
.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 249
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 116
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 86
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 268
- Replies
- 41
- Views
- 336
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8383
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 477
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-