Zone1 A Question: Why would a bacteria be considered life on Mars and a heartbeat not be considered life on Earth?

A fetus cannot be a living thing on it's own like bacteria. Were we to find either on Mars it would be big news but in the case of the fetus the question would be where is the mom?
Why do we applaud a woman who destroys the life growing within her because she's "not ready" to be a mother, but put in prison a woman who destroys that life after she gives birth and realizes she's "not ready" to be a mother?

Why do we say not letting a woman destroy the life growing with her is slavery because we're forcing her to support a life, but letting her destroy the life that's totally dependent on her after birth is murder?

The bottom line remains, the baby growing in a mother is a human life at an early stage, and if we could agree on that, then we could have an honest discussion on how valuable that human life is and understand the price tag we pay in order to destroy it. Consider this, we accept the loss of tens of thousands of lives every year simply so we can drive fast. Obviously, human life matters less to us than that privilege.
 
The pro-abortion and atheists would consider finding life on Mars something to protect but not a living person inside their mother's womb. Why would a bacteria be considered then life on Mars and a heart beat not be considered life on Earth?
You have the key ! We need to tax that fucking Martian bacteria !
 
Neither is a new born baby able to live on its own. So, you are okay with killing babies, infants, toddlers? Where does it end? You sound like Herod.

Once again, the pro-aborts are a death cult, and they don't discriminate who they kill. They're fine with killing babies, infants, toddlers, the handicapped, the old, the weak, the infirm, the mentally challenged, the unvaccinated, etc. It's all about the killing. Read Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood). She was a racist eugenicist who advocated killing blacks and others she deemed "human weeds".
 
Why do we applaud a woman who destroys the life growing within her because she's "not ready" to be a mother, but put in prison a woman who destroys that life after she gives birth and realizes she's "not ready" to be a mother?

Why do we say not letting a woman destroy the life growing with her is slavery because we're forcing her to support a life, but letting her destroy the life that's totally dependent on her after birth is murder?

The bottom line remains, the baby growing in a mother is a human life at an early stage, and if we could agree on that, then we could have an honest discussion on how valuable that human life is and understand the price tag we pay in order to destroy it. Consider this, we accept the loss of tens of thousands of lives every year simply so we can drive fast. Obviously, human life matters less to us than that privilege.
.



If she's "not ready to be a mother", she needs to stop acting like an adult woman and remain a child until she is ready.

Either that or have her mommy take her to the doctor for sterilization.




.
 

Forum List

Back
Top