A record-setting blizzard killed 75,000 cows and you might not have even heard about

But the almanac sucks ass, and the models are excellent. The almanac does worse than chance guessing. However, since the almanac _claims_ to be right, you believe. I hope you all don't have the Home Shopping Network channel available, given how little BS resistance you possess.

In contrast, we in the reason-based community have finely calibrated BS detectors, so we know you're spouting nonsense. You can't snow us, so one wonders why you keep trying. Yes, it plays well with your fellow cultists, and many high-fives are exchanged. The rest of the world is laughing at you, and you've turned yourselves into irrelevant jokes.

The models are excellent?

BWAHAHAHA

Like the one that gave us the hockey stick prediction????

Your BS detectors never seem to go off when people try to control you more and more, unless you have some masochistic desire to be told by big daddy government how to live, eat breathe and think.

Its always comical when the progressive lemmings say they are "free thinkers" when they come to the same conclusion as the other progressive lemmings.
 
A RECORD-SETTING BLIZZARD KILLED 75,000 COWS AND YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE EVEN HEARD ABOUT IT
Ranchers are still digging out thousands of their cattle that became buried in a record-setting snowstorm in South Dakota late last week and over the weekend.

One would think the death of 75,000 cows by upwards of five feet of snow might get some national attention, but as one blogger observed, it has taken some time for the news of the precipitation massacre to reach outside of local media.

--

Early estimates suggest western South Dakota lost at least 5 percent of its cattle, said Silvia Christen, executive director of the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association. Some individual ranchers reported losses of 20 percent to 50 percent of their livestock, Christen said. The storm killed calves that were due to be sold soon as well as cows that would produce next year’s calves in an area where livestock production is a big part of the economy, she said.

“This is, from an economic standpoint, something we’re going to feel for a couple of years,” Christen said.​

Dang. That's gonna hurt a lot of folks.

Holy ouch. :(
 
A RECORD-SETTING BLIZZARD KILLED 75,000 COWS AND YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE EVEN HEARD ABOUT IT
Ranchers are still digging out thousands of their cattle that became buried in a record-setting snowstorm in South Dakota late last week and over the weekend.

One would think the death of 75,000 cows by upwards of five feet of snow might get some national attention, but as one blogger observed, it has taken some time for the news of the precipitation massacre to reach outside of local media.

--

Early estimates suggest western South Dakota lost at least 5 percent of its cattle, said Silvia Christen, executive director of the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association. Some individual ranchers reported losses of 20 percent to 50 percent of their livestock, Christen said. The storm killed calves that were due to be sold soon as well as cows that would produce next year’s calves in an area where livestock production is a big part of the economy, she said.

“This is, from an economic standpoint, something we’re going to feel for a couple of years,” Christen said.​

Dang. That's gonna hurt a lot of folks.

I don't recall witch (yes) forum it was on but someone started a thread blaming Obama and the shutdown for it.
 
The denialists are devolving. Now they're rejecting modern forecasting and swearing by the Farmer's Almanac. Next up, Westwall tells us about the groundhog seeing his shadow, wooly bear caterpillars, his rheumatism acting up, and the rest of his precision climate prediction tools.

Hey dummy, the farmers almanac has been around long before you Moonbats started your sky is falling foolishness
 
But the almanac sucks ass, and the models are excellent. The almanac does worse than chance guessing. However, since the almanac _claims_ to be right, you believe. I hope you all don't have the Home Shopping Network channel available, given how little BS resistance you possess.

In contrast, we in the reason-based community have finely calibrated BS detectors, so we know you're spouting nonsense. You can't snow us, so one wonders why you keep trying. Yes, it plays well with your fellow cultists, and many high-fives are exchanged. The rest of the world is laughing at you, and you've turned yourselves into irrelevant jokes.









The Almanac has an 80% hit rate as opposed to the computer models 0.00% What was it that MIT said about those models???? Oh yeah "next to useless".
 
But the almanac sucks ass, and the models are excellent. The almanac does worse than chance guessing. However, since the almanac _claims_ to be right, you believe. I hope you all don't have the Home Shopping Network channel available, given how little BS resistance you possess.

In contrast, we in the reason-based community have finely calibrated BS detectors, so we know you're spouting nonsense. You can't snow us, so one wonders why you keep trying. Yes, it plays well with your fellow cultists, and many high-fives are exchanged. The rest of the world is laughing at you, and you've turned yourselves into irrelevant jokes.

The models are excellent?

BWAHAHAHA

Like the one that gave us the hockey stick prediction????

Your BS detectors never seem to go off when people try to control you more and more, unless you have some masochistic desire to be told by big daddy government how to live, eat breathe and think.

Its always comical when the progressive lemmings say they are "free thinkers" when they come to the same conclusion as the other progressive lemmings.






I believe that IS the nature of lemmings....is it not?
 
The denialists are devolving. Now they're rejecting modern forecasting and swearing by the Farmer's Almanac. Next up, Westwall tells us about the groundhog seeing his shadow, wooly bear caterpillars, his rheumatism acting up, and the rest of his precision climate prediction tools.

Yeah, the models predicted the early snow.

Yeah

Sure it did
 
The denialists are devolving. Now they're rejecting modern forecasting and swearing by the Farmer's Almanac. Next up, Westwall tells us about the groundhog seeing his shadow, wooly bear caterpillars, his rheumatism acting up, and the rest of his precision climate prediction tools.

Yeah, the models predicted the early snow.

Yeah

Sure it did

lots of it ta boot

--LOL
 
What gets me is these ranchers - don't they watch weather reports?
 
Holy Cow!!!
That's udderly incredible!!!

Wonder what it'll do to the market?
:eusa_eh:

eat-more-chikin.jpg
 
What gets me is these ranchers - don't they watch weather reports?

there was a few problems

first most cattle this early in the year are out on grazing pastures

two this early in the year the cattle have not grown their winter hides
 
A RECORD-SETTING BLIZZARD KILLED 75,000 COWS AND YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE EVEN HEARD ABOUT IT
Ranchers are still digging out thousands of their cattle that became buried in a record-setting snowstorm in South Dakota late last week and over the weekend.

One would think the death of 75,000 cows by upwards of five feet of snow might get some national attention, but as one blogger observed, it has taken some time for the news of the precipitation massacre to reach outside of local media.

--

Early estimates suggest western South Dakota lost at least 5 percent of its cattle, said Silvia Christen, executive director of the South Dakota Stockgrowers Association. Some individual ranchers reported losses of 20 percent to 50 percent of their livestock, Christen said. The storm killed calves that were due to be sold soon as well as cows that would produce next year’s calves in an area where livestock production is a big part of the economy, she said.

“This is, from an economic standpoint, something we’re going to feel for a couple of years,” Christen said.​

Dang. That's gonna hurt a lot of folks.

We're north of this storm and even we were in shock at how little coverage their was on this blizzard that hit and I listen to radio that covers this whole region.
 
What gets me is these ranchers - don't they watch weather reports?

there was a few problems

first most cattle this early in the year are out on grazing pastures

two this early in the year the cattle have not grown their winter hides
Then, it rained for 12 hours before it changed to snow...so the cows were soaked. Hypothermia got 'em.
 
What gets me is these ranchers - don't they watch weather reports?

there was a few problems

first most cattle this early in the year are out on grazing pastures

two this early in the year the cattle have not grown their winter hides
Then, it rained for 12 hours before it changed to snow...so the cows were soaked. Hypothermia got 'em.

beef cattle pretty much live outside 24/7 /365

the summer pastures offer little or no protection from the elements
 
there was a few problems

first most cattle this early in the year are out on grazing pastures

two this early in the year the cattle have not grown their winter hides
Then, it rained for 12 hours before it changed to snow...so the cows were soaked. Hypothermia got 'em.

beef cattle pretty much live outside 24/7 /365

the summer pastures offer little or no protection from the elements

These ranches in that part of the world are incredibly large and the cattle are all over them, even in ideal conditions rounding them up would be nearly impossible in a few days time.

This is going to hurt for a very long time. You don't just regrow cows.
 
The Almanac has an 80% hit rate

Bullshit. The almanac _claims_ such a thing, but those with a functioning BS detector understand the difference between a claim and a fact.

Denialists are almost always perfect examples of this:

Right-wing authoritarianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
---
According to research by Altemeyer, right-wing authoritarians tend to exhibit cognitive errors and symptoms of faulty reasoning. Specifically, they are more likely to make incorrect inferences from evidence and to hold contradictory ideas that result from compartmentalized thinking. They are also more likely to uncritically accept insufficient evidence that supports their beliefs, and they are less likely to acknowledge their own limitations.
---
 

Forum List

Back
Top